| Literature DB >> 27909552 |
Kazuya Takahashi1, Yuichi Sato1, Junji Kohisa1, Jun Watanabe1, Hiroki Sato1, Kenichi Mizuno1, Satoru Hashimoto1, Shuji Terai1.
Abstract
AIM: To compare the healing effects of vonoprazan and lansoprazole on gastric ulcers induced by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).Entities:
Keywords: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Gastric cancer; Lansoprazole; Potassium-competitive acid blocker; Proton pump inhibitor; Vonoprazan
Year: 2016 PMID: 27909552 PMCID: PMC5114461 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i19.716
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc
Figure 1Flow chart of the participants in the study. Thirty patients were enrolled and four of them were excluded because they needed additional surgery or violated the protocol. Finally, 14 patients in the vonoprazan group and 12 patients in the lansoprazole group were included in the analysis. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Figure 2From the day of endoscopic submucosal dissection, intravenous infusion of proton pump inhibitor (lansoprazole 30 mg) was administered to all patients for 2 d. Then, oral intake was initiated and patients in the vonoprazan group were administered vonoprazan (20 mg daily) and patients in the lansoprazole group were administered lansoprazole (30 mg daily) until 28 d after ESD. Patients underwent follow-up EGD on day 8 and day 28. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; PPI: Proton pump inhibitor; iv: Intravenous injection.
Figure 3A representative case in the lansoprazole group. The area inside the yellow line was calculated using ImageJ. We placed measuring forceps on the ulcer base to use as a scale. The ulcer base gradually shrank and there were no adverse events. The shrinking rates on days 8 and 28 were 27.1% and 96.3%, respectively.
Backgrounds of the patients and endoscopic submucosal dissection results n (%)
| Backgrounds | |||
| Age (yr) | 71.9 ± 7.9 | 74.8 ± 8.3 | 0.371 |
| Sex (M/F) | 12/2 | 10/2 | 0.867 |
| Anticoagulants | 1 (7.1) | 1 (8.3) | 0.910 |
| Antiplatelet agents | 3 (21.4) | 3 (21.4) | 0.829 |
| Steroids | 1 (7.1) | 0 (0) | 0.345 |
| 4 (28.6) | 5 (0.417) | 0.484 | |
| Atrophic gastritis | |||
| Closed type | 3 (21.4) | 0 (0) | 0.088 |
| Open type | 11 (78.6) | 12 (100.0) | |
| Location | |||
| Upper | 1 | 0 | 0.618 |
| Middle | 5 | 4 | |
| Lower | 8 | 8 | |
| ESD results | |||
| 14 (100.0) | 12 (100.0) | ||
| Procedure time (min) | 88 (36-246) | 51.5 (12-202) | 0.123 |
| Submucosal fibrosis | 3 (25.0) | 1 (8.3) | 0.356 |
| Histopathology | |||
| Tub1 | 12 | 10 | 0.504 |
| Tub1 + tub2 | 1 | 2 | |
| Tub1 + tub2 + por2 | 1 | 0 |
Data were expressed as number (%), mean ± SD, or median (range). A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. M: Male; F: Female; ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection.
The evaluation of the endoscopic submucosal dissection induced ulcers and delayed bleeding
| Area of the ulcer just after ESD (mm3) | 1446.9 (605-3977.4) | 1262.6 (597.8-7322.3) | 89 | |
| Results of the follow-up endoscopy | ||||
| Area of the ulcer on day 8 (mm3) | 533.5 (93.6-1735.9) | 459.8 (90.5-5479.5) | 93 | |
| Shrinking rate on day 8 (%) | 61.8 (24.0-91.1) | 71.3 (25.2-88.6) | 70.5 | |
| Area of the ulcer on day 28 (mm3) | 61.6 (0-289.1) | 28.7 (1.1-639.4) | 93 | |
| Shrinking rate on day 28 (%) | 95.3 (76.2-100) | 97.2 (81.1-99.8) | 68 | |
| Delayed ulcer healing | 3/14 (21.4) | 1/12 (8.3) | 0.356 | |
| Delayed bleeding | 0/14 (0) | 0/12 (0) | 1 | |
χ2;
Mann-Whitney U test. Data were expressed as number (%), mean ± SD, or median (range). U value less than 45 and P value less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection.