Literature DB >> 27909500

Cardiac Rhythm Device Threshold Testing Via Pulse Oxymetry.

Vladimir Fridman1, Cesare Saponieri1, Nabil El Sherif1, Gioia Turitto1.   

Abstract

Threshold testing of cardiac rhythm devices is essential to monitoring the proper functioning of such devices (1). However, the currently method of applying multiple ECG leads to the patient is burdensome and time consuming (2). We are presenting a completely new way to perform cardiac rhythm device threshold testing using pulse oximetry. Twenty patients, with varying cardiac rhythm devices and pacing modes, were enrolled and had their atrial and ventricular thresholds tested. A comparison was made between simultaneous threshold determinations via the standard EGM based method and the new pulse oximetry based method. 75% of the ventricular threshold tested and 58% of the atrial thresholds tested were the same with the two testing methods. The remainder of the tests (25% of ventricular threshold and 42% of the atrial threshold tests) varied by +0.25 V. This study shows that pulse oximetry based testing is an accurate, reliable, and easy way to perform cardiac rhythm device threshold testing and may complement traditional methods to perform such tests in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac Rhythm; Oximetry; Photoplethysmogram; Plethysmography

Year:  2016        PMID: 27909500      PMCID: PMC5089475          DOI: 10.4022/jafib.1389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation        ISSN: 1941-6911


  4 in total

1.  Pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform during changes in blood volume.

Authors:  M Shamir; L A Eidelman; Y Floman; L Kaplan; R Pizov
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 2.  Contemporary pacemaker and defibrillator device therapy: challenges confronting the general cardiologist.

Authors:  Mark H Schoenfeld
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Pulse oximetry: principles and limitations.

Authors:  J E Sinex
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.469

4.  What is the "optimal" follow-up schedule for ICD patients?

Authors:  Julia C Senges-Becker; Martina Klostermann; Ruediger Becker; Alexander Bauer; Karl E Siegler; Hugo A Katus; Wolfgang Schoels
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.214

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.