| Literature DB >> 27907044 |
Alexandra Fischer1, Simone Onur1, Petra Niklowitz2, Thomas Menke2, Matthias Laudes3, Gerald Rimbach4, Frank Döring1.
Abstract
Aging is associated with sarcopenia, which is a loss of skeletal muscle mass and function. Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) is involved in several important functions that are related to bioenergetics and protection against oxidative damage; however, the role of CoQ10 as a determinant of muscular strength is not well documented. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the determinants of muscular strength by examining hand grip force in relation to CoQ10 status, gender, age and body mass index (BMI) in two independent cohorts (n = 334, n = 967). Furthermore, peak flow as a function of respiratory muscle force was assessed. Spearman's correlation revealed a significant positive association between CoQ10/cholesterol level and hand grip in the basic study population (p<0.01) as well as in the validation population (p<0.001). In the latter, we also found a negative correlation with the CoQ10 redox state (p<0.01), which represents a lower percentage of the reduced form of CoQ10 (ubiquinol) in subjects who exhibit a lower muscular strength. Furthermore, the age of the subjects showed a negative correlation with hand grip (p<0.001), whereas BMI was positively correlated with hand grip (p<0.01), although only in the normal weight subgroup (BMI <25 kg/m2). Analysis of the covariance (ANCOVA) with hand grip as the dependent variable revealed CoQ10/cholesterol as a determinant of muscular strength and gender as the strongest effector of hand grip. In conclusion, our data suggest that both a low CoQ10/cholesterol level and a low percentage of the reduced form of CoQ10 could be an indicator of an increased risk of sarcopenia in humans due to their negative associations to upper body muscle strength, peak flow and muscle mass.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27907044 PMCID: PMC5132250 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characterization of the basic study population (n = 334).
| Males ( | Females ( | Total ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | r | r | r | |||
| 41.0 ± 10.9 | 0.008 | 39.8 ± 11.5 | −0.258 | 40.4 ± 11.2 | −0.015 | |
| p = 0.918 | p = 0.780 | |||||
| 87.6 ± 14.7 | 0.245 | 73.1 ± 14.7 | 0.271 | 80.8 ± 16.4 | 0.525 | |
| 182.1 ± 7.3 | 0.207 | 168.9 ± 6.75 | 0.242 | 175.9 ± 9.6 | 0.672 | |
| 32.6 ± 5.15 | 0.172 | 19.8 ± 3.92 | 0.306 | 26.7 ± 7.89 | 0.744 | |
| 525.3 ± 98.5 | 0.316 | 388.2 ± 55.1 | 0.274 | 461.3 ± 106.2 | 0.525 | |
| 26.4 ± 4.08 | 0.138 | 25.6 ±4.79 | 0.175 | 26.0 ± 4.4 | 0.212 | |
| p = 0.067 | ||||||
| 0.978 ± 0.37 | 0.004 | 0.872 ± 0.29 | -0.099 | 0.929 ± 0.34 | 0.103 | |
| p = 0.955 | p = 0.217 | p = 0.061 | ||||
| 12.1 ± 2.53 | 0.073 | 12.4 ± 2.20 | −0.067 | 12.3 ± 2.4 | −0.066 | |
| p = 0.333 | p = 0.407 | p = 0.232 | ||||
| 193.7 ± 53.4 | 0.004 | 177.3 ± 54.1 | -0.025 | 186.0 ± 54.4 | 0.154 | |
| p = 956 | p = 0.756 | |||||
| 5.01 ± 1.03 | -0.015 | 4.91 ± 0.77 | -0.148 | 4.96 ± 0.917 | 0.013 | |
| p = 0.844 | p = 0.066 | p = 0.812 | ||||
| 166.1 ± 94.1 | 0.013 | 106.7 ±62.7 | 0.018 | 138.4 ± 86.2 | 0.365 | |
| p = 0.865 | p = 0.827 | |||||
| 0.904 ± 0.12 | 0.039 | 0.713 ± 0.11 | 0.063 | 0.815 ±0.151 | 0.570 | |
| p = 0.604 | p = 0.436 | |||||
| 52.4 ± 8.63 | 32.5 ± 5.88 | 43.1 ± 12.4 | ||||
Data are presented as the mean ± SD. BMI: body mass index; CoQ10: total Coenzyme Q10; CoQ10 redox: % oxidized CoQ10 in total.
ar = Spearman’s correlation coefficient between the hand grip and the evaluated parameter in the total study population. In the case of a normal distribution (muscle mass, cholesterol), Pearson’s correlation was applied.
bMuscle mass was calculated according to [32–34].
*p<0.05
**p<0.01
***p<0.001 significant differences between the sexes, evaluated by the Mann-Whitney-U-Test after testing for normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov). In case of a normal distribution (muscle mass; cholesterol), Student’s t-test was applied.
Fig 1Scatterplots of correlations between hand grip and CoQ10/cholesterol, body mass index, age, peak flow, creatine kinase and creatinine in the basic study population (n = 334).
Spearman’s correlation analysis revealed a significant relationship (p<0.01) between hand grip and CoQ10/cholesterol (A), BMI (B), peak flow (C), creatine kinase (E) and creatinine (F), whereas the correlation between hand grip and age (C) was statistically not significant. Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r), p-values and regression lines are given. CoQ10: Coenzyme Q10; BMI: body mass index.
Characterization of the validation population (n = 967), including 658 overweight/obese study subjects.
| Males ( | Females ( | Total ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | r | r | r | |||
| 56.1 ± 13.5 | -0.427 | 50.6 ± 14.5 | -0.416 | 52.6 ± 14.1 | -0.137 | |
| 102.3 ± 33.2 | 0.195 | 92.6 ± 32.1 | 0.230 | 96.0 ± 32.8 | 0.270 | |
| 180.5 ± 8.5 | 0.331 | 168.0 ± 6.7 | 0.434 | 172.4 ± 9.5 | 0.695 | |
| 31.3 ± 9.0 | 0.115 | 32.8 ± 11.0 | 0.131 | 32.2 ± 10.4 | 0.056 | |
| p = 0.082 | ||||||
| | 23.2 ± 1.59 | 0.301 | 22.1 ± 2.07 | 0.170 | 22.4 ± 2.01 | 0.170 |
| ( | ( | ( | ||||
| | 27.3 ± 1.13 | −0.144 | 27.3 ± 1.19 | −0.110 | 27.3 ± 1.16 | −0.110 |
| ( | p = 0.131 | ( | p = 0.131 | ( | p = 0.131 | |
| | 39.4 ± 8.68 | -0.044 | 41.4 ± 8.39 | 0.002 | 40.8 ± 8.52 | 0.002 |
| ( | p = 0.601 | ( | p = 0.973 | ( | p = 0.973 | |
| 0.852 ± 0.30 | -0.071 | 0.801 ± 0.28 | -0.120 | 0.819 ± 0.29 | -0.002 | |
| p = 0.193 | p = 0.946 | |||||
| 13.4 ± 2.31 | -0.035 | 13.6 ± 2.08 | -0.059 | 13.5 ± 2.17 | -0.082 | |
| p = 0.525 | p = 0.143 | |||||
| 193.1 ± 56.0 | -0.088 | 168.8 ± 49.3 | -0.029 | 177.3 ± 53.0 | 0.131 | |
| p = 0.104 | p = 0.476 | |||||
| 4.41 ± 0.887 | 0.046 | 4.76 ± 0.989 | -0.207 | 4.63 ± 0.968 | -0.185 | |
| p = 0.393 | ||||||
| 42.5 ± 9.4 | 25.0 ± 6.4 | 31.2 ± 11.3 | ||||
Data are presented as the mean ± SD. BMI: body mass index; CoQ10: total Coenzyme Q10; CoQ10 redox: % oxidized CoQ10 in total.
ar = Spearman’s correlation coefficient between the hand grip and the evaluated parameter in the total study population. In the case of a normal distribution (cholesterol), Pearson’s correlation was applied.
*p<0.05
**p<0.01
***p<0.001 significant differences between the sexes, evaluated by the Mann-Whitney U-Test after testing for normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov). In the case of a normal distribution (hand grip; cholesterol), Student’s t-test was applied.
Fig 2Scatterplots of correlations between hand grip and CoQ10/cholesterol ratio, body mass index, age and CoQ10 redox in the validation population (n = 967).
Spearman’s correlation analysis revealed a significant relationship (p<0.01) between hand grip and CoQ10/cholesterol (A), normal BMI (<25 kg/m2, B), age (C) and CoQ10 redox (D). The correlations between hand grip and overweight (BMI 25–30 kg/m2) and obese subjects (BMI >30) were statistically not significant. Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r), p-values and regression lines are given. CoQ10: Coenzyme Q10; CoQ10 redox: % oxidized coenzyme Q10 in total; BMI: body mass index.
Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) between hand grip, CoQ10/cholesterol ratio, age and BMI in A) the basic study population (n = 334) and B) the validation population (n = 967), including 658 overweight/obese subjects.
| Source | Type III sum of Squares | df | Significance | Partial η2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,477 | 3 | 3.24 | 0.022 | 0.029 | |
| 6491 | 1 | 42.7 | <0.001 | 0.115 | |
| 416 | 1 | 2.74 | 0.099 | 0.008 | |
| 50.9 | 1 | 0.336 | 0.563 | 0.001 | |
| 872 | 1 | 5.74 | 0.017 | 0.017 | |
| 4,049 | 3 | 10.8 | <0.001 | 0.033 | |
| 28,617 | 1 | 230.1 | <0.001 | 0.193 | |
| 2,266 | 1 | 18.2 | <0.001 | 0.019 | |
| 2164 | 1 | 17.4 | <0.001 | 0.018 | |
| 2.13 | 1 | 0.017 | 0.896 | <0.001 | |
dependent variable: hand grip, independent covariate: age, CoQ10/cholesterol, BMI
dependent variable: hand grip, independent covariate: age, CoQ10/cholesterol, BMI
BMI = body mass index; df = degrees of freedom, F = variance ratio