Melanie Gibson-Helm1, Helena Teede1,2, Andrea Dunaif3, Anuja Dokras4. 1. Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia. 2. Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia. 3. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611; and. 4. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, PENN PCOS Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.
Abstract
Context: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex, chronic, and under-recognized disorder. Diagnosis experience may have lasting effects on well-being and self-management. Objective: To investigate PCOS diagnosis experiences, information provided, and concerns about PCOS. Design: Cross-sectional study using an online questionnaire. Setting: Recruitment via support group web sites in 2015 to 2016. Participants: There were 1385 women with a reported diagnosis of PCOS who were living in North America (53.0%), Europe (42.2%), or other world regions (4.9%); of these, 64.8% were 18 to 35 years of age. Main Outcome Measures: Satisfaction with PCOS diagnosis experience, satisfaction with PCOS information received at the time of diagnosis, and current concerns about PCOS. Results: One-third or more of women reported >2 years (33.6%) and ≥3 health professionals (47.1%) before a diagnosis was established. Few were satisfied with their diagnosis experience (35.2%) or with the information they received (15.6%). Satisfaction with information received was positively associated with diagnosis satisfaction [odds ratio (OR), 7.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.9 to 9.9]; seeing ≥5 health professionals (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.8) and longer time to diagnosis (>2 years; OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.6) were negatively associated with diagnosis satisfaction (independent of time since diagnosis, age, and world region). Women's most common concerns were difficulty losing weight (53.6%), irregular menstrual cycles (50.8%), and infertility (44.5%). Conclusions: In the largest study of PCOS diagnosis experiences, many women reported delayed diagnosis and inadequate information. These gaps in early diagnosis, education, and support are clear opportunities for improving patient experience.
Context:Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex, chronic, and under-recognized disorder. Diagnosis experience may have lasting effects on well-being and self-management. Objective: To investigate PCOS diagnosis experiences, information provided, and concerns about PCOS. Design: Cross-sectional study using an online questionnaire. Setting: Recruitment via support group web sites in 2015 to 2016. Participants: There were 1385 women with a reported diagnosis of PCOS who were living in North America (53.0%), Europe (42.2%), or other world regions (4.9%); of these, 64.8% were 18 to 35 years of age. Main Outcome Measures: Satisfaction with PCOS diagnosis experience, satisfaction with PCOS information received at the time of diagnosis, and current concerns about PCOS. Results: One-third or more of women reported >2 years (33.6%) and ≥3 health professionals (47.1%) before a diagnosis was established. Few were satisfied with their diagnosis experience (35.2%) or with the information they received (15.6%). Satisfaction with information received was positively associated with diagnosis satisfaction [odds ratio (OR), 7.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.9 to 9.9]; seeing ≥5 health professionals (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.8) and longer time to diagnosis (>2 years; OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.6) were negatively associated with diagnosis satisfaction (independent of time since diagnosis, age, and world region). Women's most common concerns were difficulty losing weight (53.6%), irregular menstrual cycles (50.8%), and infertility (44.5%). Conclusions: In the largest study of PCOS diagnosis experiences, many women reported delayed diagnosis and inadequate information. These gaps in early diagnosis, education, and support are clear opportunities for improving patient experience.
Authors: Helena J Teede; Marie L Misso; Amanda A Deeks; Lisa J Moran; Bronwyn G A Stuckey; Jennifer L A Wong; Robert J Norman; Michael F Costello Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: Ricardo Azziz; Enrico Carmina; Didier Dewailly; Evanthia Diamanti-Kandarakis; Héctor F Escobar-Morreale; Walter Futterweit; Onno E Janssen; Richard S Legro; Robert J Norman; Ann E Taylor; Selma F Witchel Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2008-10-23 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: L Cronin; G Guyatt; L Griffith; E Wong; R Azziz; W Futterweit; D Cook; A Dunaif Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: E Scott Sills; Mark Perloe; Michael J Tucker; Carolyn R Kaplan; Marc Georges Genton; Glenn L Schattman Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2001 Impact factor: 2.809
Authors: M Geoffrey Hayes; Margrit Urbanek; David A Ehrmann; Loren L Armstrong; Ji Young Lee; Ryan Sisk; Tugce Karaderi; Thomas M Barber; Mark I McCarthy; Stephen Franks; Cecilia M Lindgren; Corrine K Welt; Evanthia Diamanti-Kandarakis; Dimitrios Panidis; Mark O Goodarzi; Ricardo Azziz; Yi Zhang; Roland G James; Michael Olivier; Ahmed H Kissebah; Elisabet Stener-Victorin; Richard S Legro; Andrea Dunaif Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Iris Lee; Laura G Cooney; Shailly Saini; Mary D Sammel; Kelly C Allison; Anuja Dokras Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Nigel K Stepto; Rhiannon K Patten; Eliza C Tassone; Marie L Misso; Leah Brennan; Jacqueline Boyle; Russell A Boyle; Cheryce L Harrison; Angelica Lindén Hirschberg; Kate Marsh; Alba Moreno-Asso; Leanne Redman; Mala Thondan; Chandrika Wijeyaratne; Helena J Teede; Lisa J Moran Journal: Sports Med Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Edgar D Torres Fernandez; Alexandra M Huffman; Maryam Syed; Damian G Romero; Licy L Yanes Cardozo Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 4.736