| Literature DB >> 27905486 |
Bum Han Ryu1,2, Tri Duc Ngo2, Wanki Yoo1,2, Sojeong Lee1, Boo-Young Kim1, Euijoo Lee1, Kyeong Kyu Kim2, T Doohun Kim1.
Abstract
Considering that the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant pathogenic bacteria is largely inEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27905486 PMCID: PMC5131357 DOI: 10.1038/srep37978
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Overall structural organization and multiple sequence alignment of CcEstA.
(A) The structural organization of CcEstA is compared with other related proteins in Caulobacter crescentus. Note that important catalytic residues (colored residues) are highly conserved and lie on spatially similar positions in each protein. (B) Multiple sequence alignment of CcEstA was performed with related proteins in C. crescentus using Clustal Omega and ESPript. Only three characteristic motifs of these proteins (motif I, II and III) are shown for clarity and highly conserved residues are shown in red.
Figure 2Characterization of CcEstA.
(A) Purified CcEstA was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and then stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (left; molecular standards marker, right; purified CcEstA). (B) Native-PAGE analysis with 4-MU overlay assay of CcEstA. Only one band appears on Native-PAGE gel (left) showing the fluorescent signal from 4-MU catalysis (right). (C) Size exclusion chromatography of CcEstA under non-denaturing conditions. (D) MALDI-TOF mass spectrum of CcEstA. The [M+H]+ and [M+2 H]2+ ion peaks were found at m/z value of 20,552, and 41,179, respectively.
Figure 3Enzyme assays of CcEstA.
(A) Substrate-specificity assay of CcEstA using p-nitrophenyl esters with different acyl chain lengths. (B) Regioselectivity assay of CcEstA using naphthyl derivatives. (C) Activity of CcEstA in various temperatures from 20 to 60 °C for 1 h. (D) Activity of CcEstA in different pH solutions from pH 3 to 10.
Figure 4Structural stability of CcEstA.
(A,B) Thermal analysis of CcEstA was monitored in various temperature from 20 to 60 °C using circular dichroism spectrometry (A; from 190 to 260 nm, B; at 222 nm). Note that CcEstA undergoes notable changes in structure above 50 °C. (C,D) Chemical unfolding of CcEstA. Intrinsic fluorescence spectra (C) and relative enzyme activity of CcEstA with various concentrations of urea from 0 to 5 M were recorded after 1 h incubation (D).
Figure 5Kinetics analysis of CcEstA.
With three different substrates (p-nitrophenyl acetate; p-NA, p-nitrophenyl octanoate; p-NO, and nitrocefin), Vmax, Km, and kcat of CcEstA were determined from the Lineweaver-Burk plot. Standard errors for the parameters are shown in parenthesis.
Figure 6Biochemical analysis of CcEstA.
(A) Chemical stabilities of CcEstA. The residual activities of CcEstA after 1 h incubation with different solvents are expressed relative to the initial activity (100%). (B) pH shift assay was performed to assess the enantioselectivity of CcEstA toward (R)- and (S)- methyl-3-hydroxy-2-methylpropionate. (C) Tertiary alcohol production by CcEstA using tert-butyl acetate, α-terpinyl acetate and linalyl acetate (LA). (D) β-lactamase activity of CcEstA using nitrocefin.
Figure 7Hydrolytic activity of CcEstA toward β-lactam-related compounds.
(A) Chemical structures of nitrocefin, 7-aminocephalosporanic acid (7-ACA), and cefotaxime (CTX). (B) A pH shift assay was conducted to verify the hydrolytic activity of CcEstA toward 7-ACA and CTX. PBS-2, a bacterial PBP homologue from Paenibacillus sp., was used as a positive control55. Note that CcEstA showed almost no hydrolytic activity toward 7-ACA and CTX, while nitrocefin can be hydrolyzed. (C) Competitive inhibition assay of CcEstA. 7-ACA and CTX were used as competitive inhibitors of nitrocefin. Note that both 7-ACA and CTX have almost no inhibitory effect on nitrocefin hydrolysis.
Data collection and refinement statistics for CcEstA structure.
| EstCC | |
|---|---|
| Data collection | |
| Space group | |
| Cell dimensions | |
| | 58.277 |
| 67.308 | |
| 92.093 | |
| α, β, γ (°) | 90, 90, 90 |
| Molecules/AU | 1 |
| Wavelength | 0.919805 |
| Resolution (Å) | 50–1.90 |
| No. reflections | 29140 |
| | 10.7 (37.9) |
| Mean ( | 34.8 (5.3) |
| Completeness (%) | 99.9 (100) |
| Redundancy | 7.2 (7.3) |
| Refinement | |
| Resolution (Å) | 30–1.9 |
| No. reflections | 28932 |
| | 17.04/20.10 |
| No. atoms | |
| Protein | 2801 |
| Ligand/ion | — |
| Water | 348 |
| Protein | 21.24 |
| Ligand/ion | — |
| R.M.S.D | |
| Bond lengths (Å) | 0.007 |
| Bond angles (°) | 0.857 |
| Ramachandran statistics | 97.28/2.72/0.00 |
| Completeness (%) | 99.9 (100) |
(Values in parentheses refer to the last resolution shell).
1, where I(h) is the single intensity of reflection h as determined by the ith measurement and is the mean intensity of reflections h.
2, where, Fo is the observed structure factor amplitude, and Fc is the structure factor calculated from the model.
3Rfree (%) is calculated in the same manner as Rcryst using 5% of all reflections excluded from refinement stages using high resolution data.
4R.M.S.D., Root-mean-square deviation.
5The fraction of residues in the favored, allowed, and disallowed regions of the Ramachandran diagram calculated by MOLPROBITY.
Figure 8Structural visualization and topology diagram of CcEstA.
The large α/β domain and small α domain of CcEstA are distinguished by different colors (light blue and light green, respectively). (A) Topology diagram of CcEstA. The catalytic triad residues are shown in red, and His328 in Motif III in blue. The dashed line between α8 and α9 represents a missing invisible region of electron density. (B) The overall structure of CcEstA is shown with a ribbon diagram. (C) Molecular surface of CcEstA. The substrate-binding pocket of CcEstA is shown at the center. Inside the pocket, the catalytic Ser and Tyr are shown in yellow and red, respectively. (D) Surface charge distribution of CcEstA. Blue and red regions indicate local positive and negative charge, respectively.
Figure 9Domain-domain interfaces and hydrogen-bonding networks in the active site of CcEstA.
(A) The interfaces between the large α/β domain (light blue) and the small α domain (light green) are shown. Electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonds are shown with dashed lines. (B) The hydrogen-bonding network of CcEstA around the active site is shown.
Figure 10Comparison of the active site of CcEstA, R61 DD-peptidase (3PTE), and PaPBP (2QMI).
(A) Ribbon diagram of enzyme active sites. Key residues (Ser and Lys in motif I, Tyr in motif II, and Histidine in motif III) in the active site are highlighted and shown as ball-and-stick model. (B) Molecular surfaces of the enzyme active site. Nucleophilic Ser is shown in red and other highly conserved residues (Lys, Tyr, and His) in the same color scheme with (A).
Figure 11Substrate-binding pocket of CcEstA.
(A) All residues forming the pocket are shown as a ball-and-stick model. Key residues of the active site are colored in cyan, the residues of UL in yellow, LL in green, and others in white. Two bulky residues of F67 and P159 are shown in purple and roof regions were indicated as a dotted line. (B) Four residues with two water molecules around the pocket of CcEstA are shown.
Figure 12Analysis of UL and LL in CcEstA, R61 DD-peptidase (3PTE), and PaPBP (2QMI).
(A) Catalytic residues are colored in cyan. The residues of UL are in yellow and those of LL are in green. (B,C) Molecular surface representation of UL and LL in ribbon diagram. Front view (B) and top view (C) are shown. Note that the orientation of UL and LL in CcEstA is different from those of R61 DD-peptidase (3PTE) and PaPBP (2QMI).