Literature DB >> 27903724

A Comparison of Visual Response Properties in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus and Primary Visual Cortex of Awake and Anesthetized Mice.

Séverine Durand1, Ramakrishnan Iyer1, Kenji Mizuseki1, Saskia de Vries1, Stefan Mihalas1, R Clay Reid2.   

Abstract

The cerebral cortex of the mouse has become one of the most important systems for studying information processing and the neural correlates of behavior. Multiple studies have examined the first stages of visual cortical processing: primary visual cortex (V1) and its thalamic inputs from the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN), but more rarely in the lateral posterior nucleus (LP) in mice. Multiple single-unit surveys of dLGN and V1, both with electrophysiology and two-photon calcium imaging, have described receptive fields in anesthetized animals. Increasingly, awake animals are being used in physiological studies, so it is important to compare neuronal responses between awake and anesthetized state. We have performed a comprehensive survey of spatial and temporal response properties in V1, dLGN, and lateral posterior nucleus of both anesthetized and awake animals, using a common set of stimuli: drifting sine-wave gratings spanning a broad range of spatial and temporal parameters, and sparse noise stimuli consisting of flashed light and dark squares. Most qualitative receptive field parameters were found to be unchanged between the two states, such as most aspects of spatial processing, but there were significant differences in several parameters, most notably in temporal processing. Compared with anesthetized animals, the temporal frequency that evoked the peak response was shifted toward higher values in the dLGN of awake mice and responses were more sustained. Further, the peak response to a flashed stimulus was earlier in all three areas. Overall, however, receptive field properties in the anesthetized animal remain a good model for those in the awake animal. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The primary visual cortex (V1) of the mouse and its inputs from visual thalamus (dLGN), have become a dominant model for studying information processing in the brain. Early surveys of visual response properties (receptive fields) were performed in anesthetized animals. Although most recent studies of V1 have been performed in awake animals to examine links between vision and behavior, there have been few comprehensive studies of receptive field properties in the awake mouse, especially in dLGN and lateral posterior nucleus. We have performed a comparative survey of receptive fields in dLGN, lateral posterior nucleus, and V1 in anesthetized and awake mice. We found multiple differences in processing of time-varying stimuli, whereas the spatial aspects of receptive fields remain comparatively unchanged.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/3612144-13$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LGN; LP; anesthesia; mouse; visual cortex

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27903724      PMCID: PMC5148216          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1741-16.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  64 in total

1.  Membrane potential and firing rate in cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  M Carandini; D Ferster
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Laminar differences in the orientation selectivity of geniculate afferents in mouse primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Satoru Kondo; Kenichi Ohki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Receptive fields of single cells and topography in mouse visual cortex.

Authors:  U C Dräger
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1975-04-01       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain.

Authors:  Ed S Lein; Michael J Hawrylycz; Nancy Ao; Mikael Ayres; Amy Bensinger; Amy Bernard; Andrew F Boe; Mark S Boguski; Kevin S Brockway; Emi J Byrnes; Lin Chen; Li Chen; Tsuey-Ming Chen; Mei Chi Chin; Jimmy Chong; Brian E Crook; Aneta Czaplinska; Chinh N Dang; Suvro Datta; Nick R Dee; Aimee L Desaki; Tsega Desta; Ellen Diep; Tim A Dolbeare; Matthew J Donelan; Hong-Wei Dong; Jennifer G Dougherty; Ben J Duncan; Amanda J Ebbert; Gregor Eichele; Lili K Estin; Casey Faber; Benjamin A Facer; Rick Fields; Shanna R Fischer; Tim P Fliss; Cliff Frensley; Sabrina N Gates; Katie J Glattfelder; Kevin R Halverson; Matthew R Hart; John G Hohmann; Maureen P Howell; Darren P Jeung; Rebecca A Johnson; Patrick T Karr; Reena Kawal; Jolene M Kidney; Rachel H Knapik; Chihchau L Kuan; James H Lake; Annabel R Laramee; Kirk D Larsen; Christopher Lau; Tracy A Lemon; Agnes J Liang; Ying Liu; Lon T Luong; Jesse Michaels; Judith J Morgan; Rebecca J Morgan; Marty T Mortrud; Nerick F Mosqueda; Lydia L Ng; Randy Ng; Geralyn J Orta; Caroline C Overly; Tu H Pak; Sheana E Parry; Sayan D Pathak; Owen C Pearson; Ralph B Puchalski; Zackery L Riley; Hannah R Rockett; Stephen A Rowland; Joshua J Royall; Marcos J Ruiz; Nadia R Sarno; Katherine Schaffnit; Nadiya V Shapovalova; Taz Sivisay; Clifford R Slaughterbeck; Simon C Smith; Kimberly A Smith; Bryan I Smith; Andy J Sodt; Nick N Stewart; Kenda-Ruth Stumpf; Susan M Sunkin; Madhavi Sutram; Angelene Tam; Carey D Teemer; Christina Thaller; Carol L Thompson; Lee R Varnam; Axel Visel; Ray M Whitlock; Paul E Wohnoutka; Crissa K Wolkey; Victoria Y Wong; Matthew Wood; Murat B Yaylaoglu; Rob C Young; Brian L Youngstrom; Xu Feng Yuan; Bin Zhang; Theresa A Zwingman; Allan R Jones
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Klusters, NeuroScope, NDManager: a free software suite for neurophysiological data processing and visualization.

Authors:  Lynn Hazan; Michaël Zugaro; György Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Comparative electrophysiology of pyramidal and sparsely spiny stellate neurons of the neocortex.

Authors:  D A McCormick; B W Connors; J W Lighthall; D A Prince
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex.

Authors:  J A Movshon; I D Thompson; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Modulation of visual responses by behavioral state in mouse visual cortex.

Authors:  Cristopher M Niell; Michael P Stryker
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  The linearity and selectivity of neuronal responses in awake visual cortex.

Authors:  Yao Chen; Sanjiv Anand; Susana Martinez-Conde; Stephen L Macknik; Yulia Bereshpolova; Harvey A Swadlow; Jose-Manuel Alonso
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  EEG-dependent modulation of response dynamics of cat dLGN relay cells and the contribution of corticogeniculate feedback.

Authors:  K Funke; U T Eysel
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1992-02-28       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  45 in total

1.  Visual Response Characteristics in Lateral and Medial Subdivisions of the Rat Pulvinar.

Authors:  Andrzej T Foik; Leo R Scholl; Georgina A Lean; David C Lyon
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Long-term Monocular Deprivation during Juvenile Critical Period Disrupts Binocular Integration in Mouse Visual Thalamus.

Authors:  Carey Y L Huh; Karim Abdelaal; Kirstie J Salinas; Diyue Gu; Jack Zeitoun; Dario X Figueroa Velez; John P Peach; Charless C Fowlkes; Sunil P Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A Fine-Scale Functional Logic to Convergence from Retina to Thalamus.

Authors:  Liang Liang; Alex Fratzl; Glenn Goldey; Rohan N Ramesh; Arthur U Sugden; Josh L Morgan; Chinfei Chen; Mark L Andermann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Diverse tuning underlies sparse activity in layer 2/3 vibrissal cortex of awake mice.

Authors:  Yadollah Ranjbar-Slamloo; Ehsan Arabzadeh
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Visual physiology of the layer 4 cortical circuit in silico.

Authors:  Anton Arkhipov; Nathan W Gouwens; Yazan N Billeh; Sergey Gratiy; Ramakrishnan Iyer; Ziqiang Wei; Zihao Xu; Reza Abbasi-Asl; Jim Berg; Michael Buice; Nicholas Cain; Nuno da Costa; Saskia de Vries; Daniel Denman; Severine Durand; David Feng; Tim Jarsky; Jérôme Lecoq; Brian Lee; Lu Li; Stefan Mihalas; Gabriel K Ocker; Shawn R Olsen; R Clay Reid; Gilberto Soler-Llavina; Staci A Sorensen; Quanxin Wang; Jack Waters; Massimo Scanziani; Christof Koch
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Audiovisual Modulation in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex Depends on Cross-Modal Stimulus Configuration and Congruency.

Authors:  Guido T Meijer; Jorrit S Montijn; Cyriel M A Pennartz; Carien S Lansink
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Development, form, and function of the mouse visual thalamus.

Authors:  William Guido
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Multiple Timescales Account for Adaptive Responses across Sensory Cortices.

Authors:  Kenneth W Latimer; Dylan Barbera; Michael Sokoletsky; Bshara Awwad; Yonatan Katz; Israel Nelken; Ilan Lampl; Adriene L Fairhall; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Intracellular, In Vivo, Dynamics of Thalamocortical Synapses in Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Madineh Sedigh-Sarvestani; Leif Vigeland; Ivan Fernandez-Lamo; M Morgan Taylor; Larry A Palmer; Diego Contreras
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Synaptic Mechanisms of Feature Coding in the Visual Cortex of Awake Mice.

Authors:  Hillel Adesnik
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.