| Literature DB >> 27903528 |
Michael R Grever1, Omar Abdel-Wahab2, Leslie A Andritsos1, Versha Banerji3, Jacqueline Barrientos4, James S Blachly1, Timothy G Call5, Daniel Catovsky6, Claire Dearden7, Judit Demeter8, Monica Else6, Francesco Forconi9, Alessandro Gozzetti10, Anthony D Ho11, James B Johnston3, Jeffrey Jones1, Gunnar Juliusson12, Eric Kraut1, Robert J Kreitman13, Loree Larratt14, Francesco Lauria10, Gerard Lozanski15, Emili Montserrat16, Sameer A Parikh5, Jae H Park2, Aaron Polliack17, Graeme R Quest18, Kanti R Rai4, Farhad Ravandi19, Tadeusz Robak20, Alan Saven21, John F Seymour22, Tamar Tadmor23, Martin S Tallman2, Constantine Tam22, Enrico Tiacci24, Xavier Troussard25, Clive S Zent26, Thorsten Zenz27, Pier Luigi Zinzani28, Brunangelo Falini24.
Abstract
Hairy cell leukemia is an uncommon hematologic malignancy characterized by pancytopenia and marked susceptibility to infection. Tremendous progress in the management of patients with this disease has resulted in high response rates and improved survival, yet relapse and an appropriate approach to re-treatment present continuing areas for research. The disease and its effective treatment are associated with immunosuppression. Because more patients are being treated with alternative programs, comparison of results will require general agreement on definitions of response, relapse, and methods of determining minimal residual disease. The development of internationally accepted, reproducible criteria is of paramount importance in evaluating and comparing clinical trials to provide optimal care. Despite the success achieved in managing these patients, continued participation in available clinical trials in the first-line and particularly in the relapse setting is highly recommended. The Hairy Cell Leukemia Foundation convened an international conference to provide common definitions and structure to guide current management. There is substantial opportunity for continued research in this disease. In addition to the importance of optimizing the prevention and management of the serious risk of infection, organized evaluations of minimal residual disease and treatment at relapse offer ample opportunities for clinical research. Finally, a scholarly evaluation of quality of life in the increasing number of survivors of this now manageable chronic illness merits further study. The development of consensus guidelines for this disease offers a framework for continued enhancement of the outcome for patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27903528 PMCID: PMC5290982 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-689422
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113