Literature DB >> 27902970

Activity of the novel polo-like kinase 4 inhibitor CFI-400945 in pancreatic cancer patient-derived xenografts.

Ines Lohse1, Jacqueline Mason1, Pinjiang Mary Cao1, Melania Pintilie1, Mark Bray1, David W Hedley1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4) plays a key role in centriole replication. Hence PLK4 inhibition disrupts mitosis, and offers a novel approach to treating chromosomally unstable cancers, including pancreatic cancer. CFI-400945 is a first in class small molecule PLK4 inhibitor, currently undergoing early phase clinical trials.
RESULTS: Treatment with CFI-400945 significantly reduced tumor growth and increased survival in four out of the six models tested. Consistent with PLK4 inhibition, we observed reduced expression of the proliferation marker Ki-67 associated with an increase in nuclear diameter during treatment with CFI-400945. Additionally, treatment with CFI-400945 resulted in a significant reduction of tumor-initiating cells. DISCUSSION: These results support the further investigation of PLK4 as a drug target in pancreatic cancer.
METHODS: Sensitivity to CFI-400945 was tested in a series of six patient-derived pancreatic cancer xenografts, selected to represent the range of growth characteristics, genetic features, and hypoxia found in pancreatic cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CFI-400945; PLK4; pancreatic cancer; patient-derived pancreatic cancer xenografts; polo-like kinase 4

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27902970      PMCID: PMC5356865          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.13619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

The genomic landscape of pancreatic cancer is dominated by a high prevalence of mutations involving K-Ras, p53, SMAD4, and p16 [1, 2], none of which is readily targetable using currently available agents. An emerging picture from ongoing sequencing studies indicates that these cancers are characterized by an unusually high level of chromosomal instability [1, 2]. It is likely that this accounts, at least in part, for their rapid progression towards the aggressive, drug-resistant phenotype observed in the clinic. Recently it has been suggested that chromosomal instability causes vulnerability to agents that disrupt orderly movement through the late cell cycle, suggesting a novel approach to the treatment of these highly lethal cancers. Polo-like kinases (PLKs) form a family of structurally related mitotic kinases with diverse functions in the normal regulation of the late cell cycle [3, 4]. All members of the PLK family have been shown to be dysregulated in several types of cancer [5, 6, 7], and they are considered to be candidate drug targets. Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4) plays a unique role in centriole regulation [8]. Genetic manipulations that deplete PLK4 disrupt centriole duplication, whereas overexpression causes centrosome amplification. Although PLK4 inhibition would be expected to disturb mitosis in normal cells, potentially this would be more severe in chromosomally-unstable cancers, providing a clinically-useful therapeutic window. CFI-400945 is a potent PLK4 inhibitor that is currently undergoing a phase I clinical trial [9, 10, 11]. Treatment with CFI-400945 in vitro led to aberrant centriole duplication and abnormal mitoses resulting in cell death or cell-cycle arrest [9]. Preclinical testing showed single agent activity against patient-derived breast cancer xenografts [9]. This study showed an increased sensitivity of PTEN-null tumors to PLK4 inhibition using CFI-400945, suggesting that PTEN deficiency may be a predictive biomarker of CFI-400945 response [9]. In the present study we therefore tested CFI-400945 for activity in a series of orthotopically-grown, patient-derived pancreatic cancer xenografts, selected to represent the range of genetic and growth characteristics seen in the clinic.

RESULTS

Characterization of primary patient-derived xenografts

Tumor growth rate varied from 50 days in OCIP51 to 157 days in the slow growing model OCIP110, and the magnitude of hypoxia from 1% in the least hypoxic model OCIP167 to 40% in OCIP51 (Figure 1; Table 1). These PDX models showed a range of PLK4 expression, with OCIP28 showing the lowest and OCIP167 the highest expression of PLK4 mRNA (Figure 1B). With the exception of OCIP23, they showed expression of PTEN, using tumor-associated stroma as internal positive control, although in OCIP110 PTEN staining was appreciably less when compared to the stroma (Figure 1C, Table 1). Mutations in p53 were found in OCIP23 and OCIP110, resulting in widespread detection of p53 by IHC (Figure 1D; Table 1). As we reported previously, one of these models, OCIP28, is derived from a patient with a germline BRCA2 mutation [12]. All models show mutation in Kras codon 12.
Figure 1

Patient-derived pancreatic xenografts

A. The PDX models used were chosen to represent a range in growth rate defined as the time elapsed between two passages, and magnitude of hypoxia as evaluated by EF5 staining. B. PLK4 mRNA expression was examined using RTPCR. Expression of C. PTEN and D. p53 was evaluated using immunohistochemistry. Bars represent 100μm.

Table 1

Characterization of patient-derived pancreatic xenograft models

ModelDiagnosisHypoxia (%)Passage time (days)p53 exp.$ IHCPTEN exp. IHCBRCA2
meanSDmeanSD
OCIP19DAC*6.35.77120.3317.47n++ +wt**
OCIP23DAC22.166.8273.811.03y#-wt
OCIP28DAC14.897.0263.255.38n+ +mt##
OCIP51DAC39.4111.6450.3311.98n+ +wt
OCIP110DAC29.889.42158.7513.38y+wt
OCIP167DAC0.270.185.518.31n+ +wt

DAC: Ductal Adenocarcinoma;

exp. IHC: expression immunohistochemistry;

n: no;

y: yes

wt: wild type;

mt: mutant

Patient-derived pancreatic xenografts

A. The PDX models used were chosen to represent a range in growth rate defined as the time elapsed between two passages, and magnitude of hypoxia as evaluated by EF5 staining. B. PLK4 mRNA expression was examined using RTPCR. Expression of C. PTEN and D. p53 was evaluated using immunohistochemistry. Bars represent 100μm. DAC: Ductal Adenocarcinoma; exp. IHC: expression immunohistochemistry; n: no; y: yes wt: wild type; mt: mutant

Effects of PLK4 inhibitor CFI-400945 on tumor growth

The six models tested showed a wide range in sensitivity to CFI-400945, as summarized in Figure 2. Tumor weights following three weeks of treatment were significantly reduced (p<0.05) in OCIP28, 51 and 110 compared to vehicle control (Figure 2A). All three of these tumors also showed significant prolongation of survival following treatment with CFI-400945 compared to control, as did a fourth model, OCIP167 that showed borderline significant reduction in tumor weight at three weeks (Figure 2B). Treatment response was not correlated with the expression levels of the drug target PLK4 as assessed by qRT-PCR.
Figure 2

Treatment with CFI-400945 reduces tumor growth

Orthotopically implanted animals were treated with either vehicle or CFI-400945 for 21days (n=10 per group). A. Tumor weight was evaluated 24h after the last treatment (n=4-5 per group). Treatment significantly reduced tumor growth in OCIP28 (p=0.032), OCIP51 (p=0.029) and OCIP110 (p=0.0079). Tumor volume was also reduced in OCIP167 (p=0.056), although not significantly while no reduction in tumor growth was observed in OCIP19 (p=0.89) and OCIP23 (p=0.095). B. The remaining animals were observed until humane endpoint to evaluate survival (n=5-6 per group). Treatment with CFI-400945 had no impact on survival of OCIP19 (p=0.83) and OCIP23 (p=0.53) while survival increased in OCIP28 (p=0.044), OCIP51 (p=0.00091), OCIP110 (p=0.0029) and OCIP167 (p=0.014). C. Treatment response and survival was evaluated in animals orthotopically implanted with previously treated OCIP51 tumors (p=0.0004) (n=10 per group).

Treatment with CFI-400945 reduces tumor growth

Orthotopically implanted animals were treated with either vehicle or CFI-400945 for 21days (n=10 per group). A. Tumor weight was evaluated 24h after the last treatment (n=4-5 per group). Treatment significantly reduced tumor growth in OCIP28 (p=0.032), OCIP51 (p=0.029) and OCIP110 (p=0.0079). Tumor volume was also reduced in OCIP167 (p=0.056), although not significantly while no reduction in tumor growth was observed in OCIP19 (p=0.89) and OCIP23 (p=0.095). B. The remaining animals were observed until humane endpoint to evaluate survival (n=5-6 per group). Treatment with CFI-400945 had no impact on survival of OCIP19 (p=0.83) and OCIP23 (p=0.53) while survival increased in OCIP28 (p=0.044), OCIP51 (p=0.00091), OCIP110 (p=0.0029) and OCIP167 (p=0.014). C. Treatment response and survival was evaluated in animals orthotopically implanted with previously treated OCIP51 tumors (p=0.0004) (n=10 per group). One model, OCIP51, was highly sensitive to CFI-400945, with sustained survival following the initial three weeks of treatment. In order to evaluate whether OCIP51 acquires resistance to CFI-400945, tumors previously treated with one course of CFI-400945 were re-implanted orthotopically. When palpable, animals were treated for a further 21 days with either CFI-400945 or vehicle. Re-treatment with CFI-400945 significantly reduced tumor growth and increased survival when compared to the untreated control (p=0.0004), indicating that the initial exposure to drug did not select for the emergence of drug resistance (Figure 2C). As previously reported [9], treatment with CFI-400945 was well tolerated, with no signs of distress apart from weight loss (Supplementary Figure S1).

Effects of CFI-400945 on tissue markers of cell growth

The effects on Ki-67 and pH3 labeling, and nuclear size are summarized in Figure 3. As expected, the baseline levels of the two proliferation markers were roughly concordant with each other, and with the tumor growth rates (Figure 3A and 3B). The effects of treatment with CFI-400945 were variable between the different models. Although broadly consistent with inhibition of proliferation, with the most sensitive model OCIP51 showing the largest decreases in Ki-67 and pH3, significant effects on these markers were also seen in two non-responsive models, OCIP19 and 23.
Figure 3

Treatment with CFI-400945 results in reduced tumor cell proliferation

Cell proliferation was evaluated using IHC stainings for A. pH3 and B. Ki67 (n=4-5). pH3 positive cells counted and the total number of pH3 positive nuclei was normalized to the area of viable tumor tissue in order to account for differences in tumor size. Treatment with CFI-400945 reduced the fraction of Ki-67 positive cells in OCIP19 (p=0.029), OCIP28 (p=0.032), OCIP51 (p= 0.029) but not in OCIP23 (p=0.84), OCIP110 (p=0.063), OCIP167 (p=0.095). Phosphorylation of Histon H3 was significantly reduce in OCIP19 (p=0.029), OCIP51 (p=0.029), OCIP167 (p=0.029), but not in OCIP23 (p=0.057), OCIP28 (p=0.057), OCIP110 (p=0.34). C. Representative H&E stained sections display the formation of enlarged nuclei in response to treatment with CFI-400945. Bars represent 100μm. D. To analyse the effect of CFI-400945 on the size of tumor cell nuclei, the diameter of 100 random tumor cell nuclei per section was measured (n=4-5). Significant increases in nuclei size in response to CFI-400945 were observed in in all models except OCIP19 (OCIP19 p=0.074, OCIP23 p=0.023, OCIP28 p=0.012, OCIP51 p<0.0001, OCIP110 p=0.0052, OCIP167 p<0.0001).

Treatment with CFI-400945 results in reduced tumor cell proliferation

Cell proliferation was evaluated using IHC stainings for A. pH3 and B. Ki67 (n=4-5). pH3 positive cells counted and the total number of pH3 positive nuclei was normalized to the area of viable tumor tissue in order to account for differences in tumor size. Treatment with CFI-400945 reduced the fraction of Ki-67 positive cells in OCIP19 (p=0.029), OCIP28 (p=0.032), OCIP51 (p= 0.029) but not in OCIP23 (p=0.84), OCIP110 (p=0.063), OCIP167 (p=0.095). Phosphorylation of Histon H3 was significantly reduce in OCIP19 (p=0.029), OCIP51 (p=0.029), OCIP167 (p=0.029), but not in OCIP23 (p=0.057), OCIP28 (p=0.057), OCIP110 (p=0.34). C. Representative H&E stained sections display the formation of enlarged nuclei in response to treatment with CFI-400945. Bars represent 100μm. D. To analyse the effect of CFI-400945 on the size of tumor cell nuclei, the diameter of 100 random tumor cell nuclei per section was measured (n=4-5). Significant increases in nuclei size in response to CFI-400945 were observed in in all models except OCIP19 (OCIP19 p=0.074, OCIP23 p=0.023, OCIP28 p=0.012, OCIP51 p<0.0001, OCIP110 p=0.0052, OCIP167 p<0.0001). To investigate whether, in addition to reducing entry into mitosis, treatment with CFI-400945 also influenced progression through mitosis, nuclei positive for pH3 were evaluated for mitotic phases (Supplementary Table S1). Although some tumor showed significant differences in prophase, these changes were model specific and showed no correlation with the response groups established based on tumor growth and survival (Supplementary Table S1, Supplementary Table S2). While assessing these nuclear markers we noted increases in nuclear size of the treatment groups (Figure 3C). As shown in Figure 3D, the increases in mean nuclear diameter following treatment with the PLK4 inhibitor were statistically significant in all models, with the exception of the least responsive to growth inhibition, OCIP19, and most evident in the highly responsive OCIP51 PDX. In contrast, the levels of cleaved caspase 3, a marker of apoptosis, were unchanged by treatment in all six models (Supplementary Figure S2).

CFI-400945 treatment reduces tumor-initiating cells

In order to test the effect of CFI-400945 treatment on the tumor-initiating cell (TIC) population, four xenograft models (OCIP19, 23, 51 and 167) were treated with a single dose of 52mg/kg CFI-400945 and processed for limiting dilution assays. Consistent with the growth inhibition results, CFI-400945 treatment of OCIP19 tumors had little effect on the number of TIC. In OCIP23, 51 and 167, on the other hand, TIC frequency was reduced by an order of magnitude in response to treatment with CFI-400945 (Table 2).
Table 2

PLK4 inhibitions reduces TIC numbers

ModelTIC numberupper frequencylower frequency
OCIP19control1:5681:3621:892
PLK4i1:4591:1901:1,109
OCIP23control1:381:171:62
PLK4i1:1751:4981:62
OCIP51control1:151:101:21
PLK4i1:4171:2631:661
OCIP167control1:6811:2781:1,669
PLK4i1:4,6011:1,9071:11,050

DISCUSSION

The present study evaluates the efficacy of CFI-400945 in a panel of patient-derived pancreatic cancer xenografts displaying a range of growth rates, magnitudes of tumor hypoxia and PLK4 mRNA expression. Treatment with CFI-400945 significantly reduced tumor growth and increased survival in the majority of the tested xenograft models. In addition to its effect on tumor growth, treatment with CFI-400945 results in a significant reduction in tumor-initiating potential. Taken together, this suggests that CFI-400945 treatment targets both the proliferative tumor cell and the TIC population through inhibition of mitotic entry and failure of cytokinesis in response to ablation of spindle formation. Given the wide range in the response to CFI-400945 in these models, we were interested to identify candidate biomarkers to predict sensitivity in pancreatic cancer patients. The six models used were selected to represent a range of the common mutations linked to pancreatic cancer, and in their growth patterns and the extent of tumor hypoxia, which we have previously shown to be a major correlate of aggressive growth in these models. Interestingly, the most sensitive PDX, OCIP51, also has the most rapid growth, rapid metastasis and greatest level of hypoxia, suggesting that PLK4 inhibition might be particularly effective against clinically aggressive disease. However, a genetic basis for such a link remains elusive, and further research is ongoing [9]. In the present series, expression of the drug target PLK4 did not correlate with sensitivity to CFI-400945. In an earlier publication, Mason et al. [9] suggested that reduced expression of the tumor suppressor PTEN predicted the sensitivity of breast cancers to CFI-400945. However, this appears not to be the case with pancreatic cancers, since the sensitive models express the protein, whereas the only PTEN deficient PDX, OCIP23, was resistant. Drug resistance, both intrinsic and acquired, appears to be a major reason for treatment failure in pancreatic cancer patients. There appears to be very little intrinsic resistance to PLK4 inhibition based on the effects on tumor cell proliferation and tumor weight observed in this study. Re-challenge of tumors derived from a xenograft tumor previously treated with a full course of CFI-400945 showed only minimal loss of CFI-400945 efficacy, suggesting that treatment with CFI-400945 only leads to minimal development of acquired drug resistance. CFI-400945 is currently undergoing Phase 1 clinical testing (NCT01954316). Based on the results presented here we suggest that CFI-400945 presents a novel therapeutic option for pancreatic cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Establishment and characterization of patient-derived xenografts

Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) were established from pancreatectomy samples superfluous to patient diagnosis or ascites samples using a protocol approved by the University Health Network Research Ethics Board. Informed consent was obtained from all participating patients. PDX models were maintained at the orthotopic site in Severe Combined Immune Deficient (SCID) mice according to institutional guidelines for human and animal research, as previously described [13]. Because tumor size is not readily measured at the orthotopic site, growth rates were defined as the average time between two passages. The levels of hypoxia were determined by administration of the 2-nitroimidazole tracer EF5 4 hours prior to sacrifice, and immunohistochemistry using anti-EF5, as previously described [13-17]. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to determine PTEN and p53 status. Briefly, tissue sections were stained for p53 (VP-P958 (clone DO-7), Vector Labs, Burlington, ON, CA, 1:250) or PTEN (#9559, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA, 1:100) for 2h. After incubation in biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG (BA-1000, Vector Labs, Burlington, ON, CA, 1:200) followed by HRP labeling reagent (Signet Pathology System Inc, Dedham, MA, USA) for 30min, immunoreactivities were revealed by incubation in Nova Red substrate (Vector Labs, Burlington, ON, Canada) for 5min and counterstained in Mayer's haematoxylin. The expression of PLK4 was determined by RT-PCR, using RNA extracted from tumour tissue with the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Toronto, ON, Canada), and cDNA generated using SuperScript Vilo MasterMix (Life Technologies, Burlington, ON, Canada). Triplicate samples were analyzed using TaqMan array fast plates (Life Technologies, Burlington, ON, Canada), and PLK4 expression normalized against HPRT.

Drug treatment

For single treatments, animals were treated with daily oral gavage of 7.5mg/kg CFI-400945 or saline vehicle control for 21 days. Treatment started when tumors were palpable at a diameter of ~5mm. Animals were treated for three weeks, when the tumors were excised and weighed 24 hr after the last dose in half of each treatment group (n=4-5), with the remaining animals (n=5-6) maintained until the humane endpoint was reached to evaluate survival.

Assessment of treatment response

In addition to tumor growth inhibition, the tumors were assessed by IHC, using paraffin sections from the treatment and control groups. For each marker, tissue sections from 4-5 individual tumors were analyzed. Proliferation was assessed by extent of Ki-67 staining; mitotic cells were identified by phosphorylated histone H3 Serine-10 (pH3), and cells undergoing apoptosis by cleaved caspase 3 (CC3). Tissue sections were stained for Ki-67 (Novus-Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA, 1:1000) for 2h or CC3 (#9661, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA, 1:500) for 30 minutes. For pH3, sections were incubated (3077, Millipore, Etobicoke, ON, CA, 1:50) at room temperature for 1h. Antibody-labeled sections were then processed for IHC as above. Slides were scanned at 20x resolution, or 40x resolution for pH3, using an Aperio Scanscope XT scanner, and the percentage of positive pixels determined using Aperio Imagescope software. Cells stained for pH3 were counted manually, and classified as prophase, metaphase, anaphase and telophase based on morphology. The total number of pH3 positive nuclei was normalized to the area of viable tumor tissue in order to account for differences in tumor size. To measure effects of treatment on nuclear size, the diameter of 100 randomly-selected tumor cell nuclei was measured from 4-5 tumors per model, using the Aperio software.

Limiting dilution assays

Limiting dilution assays were performed as described previously [14]. Briefly, animals were treated with a single dose of 52mg/kg and tumors harvested 12h after treatment. Single-cell suspensions were prepared, a sample was stained using anti-mouse CD31-FITC, H2K-FITC and propidium iodide, and the percentage of viable cancer cells counted using a hemocytometer. 3-6 dilutions of human cells were injected into the flanks of 3 NOD/SCID mice per dilution and tumor take rate was observed over the course of 6 months. TIC frequency was calculated using the L-Calc software (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC).

Statistical analysis

The pH3 and Ki-67 labeling, and the weights of the tumours were compared utilizing the Mann-Whitney test. The survival percentages were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was applied to test the difference between treatments. Mixed effect models, with animal as a random effect, were employed to determine if treatment affected the diameter of tumor cell nuclei. In order to stabilize the variance, the log transformation was applied to tumor cell nuclei diameter.
  17 in total

1.  The discovery of Polo-like kinase 4 inhibitors: identification of (1R,2S).2-(3-((E).4-(((cis).2,6-dimethylmorpholino)methyl)styryl). 1H.indazol-6-yl)-5'-methoxyspiro[cyclopropane-1,3'-indolin]-2'-one (CFI-400945) as a potent, orally active antitumor agent.

Authors:  Peter B Sampson; Yong Liu; Bryan Forrest; Graham Cumming; Sze-Wan Li; Narendra Kumar Patel; Louise Edwards; Radoslaw Laufer; Miklos Feher; Fuqiang Ban; Donald E Awrey; Guodong Mao; Olga Plotnikova; Richard Hodgson; Irina Beletskaya; Jacqueline M Mason; Xunyi Luo; Vincent Nadeem; Xin Wei; Reza Kiarash; Brian Madeira; Ping Huang; Tak W Mak; Guohua Pan; Henry W Pauls
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 2.  Multifaceted polo-like kinases: drug targets and antitargets for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Klaus Strebhardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 3.  Molecular and Genetic Basis of Pancreatic Carcinogenesis: Which Concepts May be Clinically Relevant?

Authors:  Vincent Bernard; Jason Fleming; Anirban Maitra
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.495

4.  Detection of hypoxic cells by monoclonal antibody recognizing 2-nitroimidazole adducts.

Authors:  E M Lord; L Harwell; C J Koch
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Hypoxic heterogeneity in human tumors: EF5 binding, vasculature, necrosis, and proliferation.

Authors:  S M Evans; S M Hahn; D P Magarelli; C J Koch
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 6.  Sak/Plk4 and mitotic fidelity.

Authors:  Carol J Swallow; Michael A Ko; Najeeb U Siddiqui; John W Hudson; James W Dennis
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-01-10       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 7.  Current assessment of polo-like kinases as anti-tumor drug targets.

Authors:  Sandra N Craig; Michael D Wyatt; Campbell McInnes
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 6.098

8.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations sensitize to chemotherapy in patient-derived pancreatic cancer xenografts.

Authors:  I Lohse; A Borgida; P Cao; M Cheung; M Pintilie; T Bianco; S Holter; E Ibrahimov; R Kumareswaran; R G Bristow; M-S Tsao; S Gallinger; D W Hedley
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Targeting hypoxic microenvironment of pancreatic xenografts with the hypoxia-activated prodrug TH-302.

Authors:  Ines Lohse; Joanna Rasowski; Pinjiang Cao; Melania Pintilie; Trevor Do; Ming-Sound Tsao; Richard P Hill; David W Hedley
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-06-07

10.  Assessment of hypoxia in the stroma of patient-derived pancreatic tumor xenografts.

Authors:  Ines Lohse; Corey Lourenco; Emin Ibrahimov; Melania Pintilie; Ming-Sound Tsao; David W Hedley
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 6.639

View more
  17 in total

1.  Polo-like kinase 4 inhibition produces polyploidy and apoptotic death of lung cancers.

Authors:  Masanori Kawakami; Lisa Maria Mustachio; Lin Zheng; Yulong Chen; Jaime Rodriguez-Canales; Barbara Mino; Jonathan M Kurie; Jason Roszik; Pamela Andrea Villalobos; Kelsie L Thu; Jennifer Silvester; David W Cescon; Ignacio I Wistuba; Tak W Mak; Xi Liu; Ethan Dmitrovsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Genomics-Driven Precision Medicine for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Early Results from the COMPASS Trial.

Authors:  Kyaw L Aung; Sandra E Fischer; Robert E Denroche; Gun-Ho Jang; Anna Dodd; Sean Creighton; Bernadette Southwood; Sheng-Ben Liang; Dianne Chadwick; Amy Zhang; Grainne M O'Kane; Hamzeh Albaba; Shari Moura; Robert C Grant; Jessica K Miller; Faridah Mbabaali; Danielle Pasternack; Ilinca M Lungu; John M S Bartlett; Sangeet Ghai; Mathieu Lemire; Spring Holter; Ashton A Connor; Richard A Moffitt; Jen Jen Yeh; Lee Timms; Paul M Krzyzanowski; Neesha Dhani; David Hedley; Faiyaz Notta; Julie M Wilson; Malcolm J Moore; Steven Gallinger; Jennifer J Knox
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Hypoxia Drives Centrosome Amplification in Cancer Cells via HIF1α-dependent Induction of Polo-Like Kinase 4.

Authors:  Karuna Mittal; Jaspreet Kaur; Shaligram Sharma; Nivya Sharma; Guanhao Wei; Ishita Choudhary; Precious Imhansi-Jacob; Nagini Maganti; Shrikant Pawar; Padmashree Rida; Michael S Toss; Mohammed Aleskandarany; Emiel A Janssen; Håvard Søiland; Meenakshi V Gupta; Michelle D Reid; Emad A Rakha; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 6.333

Review 4.  Clinically Applicable Inhibitors Impacting Genome Stability.

Authors:  Anu Prakash; Juan F Garcia-Moreno; James A L Brown; Emer Bourke
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 5.  Targeting the cell cycle in breast cancer: towards the next phase.

Authors:  K L Thu; I Soria-Bretones; T W Mak; D W Cescon
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  PLK4: a promising target for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Yi Zhao; Xin Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Pathogenesis and Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer Related Pain.

Authors:  Ines Lohse; Shaun P Brothers
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.480

8.  Defining the Comprehensive Genomic Landscapes of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Using Real-World Endoscopic Aspiration Samples.

Authors:  Alexander Semaan; Vincent Bernard; Jaewon J Lee; Justin W Wong; Jonathan Huang; Daniel B Swartzlander; Bret M Stephens; Maria E Monberg; Brian R Weston; Manoop S Bhutani; Kyle Chang; Paul A Scheet; Anirban Maitra; Yasminka A Jakubek; Paola A Guerrero
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 13.801

Review 9.  Role of Polo-Like Kinase 4 (PLK4) in Epithelial Cancers and Recent Progress in its Small Molecule Targeting for Cancer Management.

Authors:  Debra R Garvey; Gagan Chhabra; Mary A Ndiaye; Nihal Ahmad
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 6.009

10.  Clinical Significance of Polo-Like Kinase 4 as a Marker for Advanced Tumor Stage and Dismal Prognosis in Patients With Surgical Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Ting Cao; Shijie Yi; Xuefeng Yang; Qing Wu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.