| Literature DB >> 24577243 |
Ines Lohse1, Corey Lourenco2, Emin Ibrahimov3, Melania Pintilie4, Ming-Sound Tsao5, David W Hedley6.
Abstract
The unusually dense stroma of pancreatic cancers is thought to play an important role in their biological aggression. The presence of hypoxia is also considered an adverse prognostic factor. Although it is usually assumed that this is the result of effects of hypoxia on the epithelial component, it is possible that hypoxia exerts indirect effects via the tumor stroma. We therefore measured hypoxia in the stroma of a series of primary pancreatic cancer xenografts. Nine patient-derived pancreatic xenografts representing a range of oxygenation levels were labeled by immunohistochemistry for EF5 and analyzed using semi-automated pattern recognition software. Hypoxia in the tumor and stroma was correlated with tumor growth and metastatic potential. The extent of hypoxia varied from 1%-39% between the different models. EF5 labeling in the stroma ranged from 0-20% between models, and was correlated with the level of hypoxia in the tumor cell area, but not microvessel density. Tumor hypoxia correlated with spontaneous metastasis formation with the exception of one hypoxic model that showed disproportionately low levels of hypoxia in the stroma and was non-metastatic. Our results demonstrate that hypoxia exists in the stroma of primary pancreatic cancer xenografts and suggest that stromal hypoxia impacts the metastatic potential.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24577243 PMCID: PMC3980617 DOI: 10.3390/cancers6010459
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Figure 1Patient-derived pancreatic xenograft models differ in the magnitude of tumor hypoxia and metastatic potential. (A) Percentage of tumor hypoxia as indicated by EF5 staining of the patient-derived xenograft models. Each point represents the hypoxia status in a single tumor. The xenograft models display a wide range of tumor hypoxia that remains similar over several passages in vivo; (B) EF5 staining vs. tumour growth shows that hypoxia mostly correlates with rapid growth pattern. Tumor growth is defined by the time elapsed between two passages. Metastatic models are labelled in red. Representative sections of (C) OCIP19, (D) OCIP23 and (E) OCIP51 stained for EF5. Tumor hypoxia in all models is found in both the tumor and tumor-associated stroma.
Figure 2Patient-derived pancreatic xenograft models differ in tumor and stroma content. Classification of EF5 stained sections using the Aperio pattern recognition software. Sections of tumors were examined for (A) epithelial and (B) stromal content. Analysis of the hypoxic fraction in the (C) epithelial and (D) stromal compartment of EF5 stained sections of tumors. Stromal hypoxia, although overall displaying a lower magnitude, shows the same pattern of high hypoxic and low hypoxic models that can be established from the analysis of the epithelial hypoxia; (E) Tumor hypoxia in the epithelial compartment strongly correlated with the stromal compartment in sections stained for the hypoxia marker EF5 using the Aperio pattern recognition software. Metastatic potential (red square) to liver and peritoneum was observed in models with high tumor and stromal hypoxia.
Figure 3Patient-derived pancreatic xenograft models differ in microvessel density. (A) Percentage of CD31 of the patient-derived xenograft models. Each point represents a single tumor. In these models, staining for CD31 indicating vessel density shows little difference between the tested models and shows no correlation with tumor hypoxia. Representative sections of (B) OCIP19, (C) OCIP23 and (D) OCIP51 stained for CD31.