Literature DB >> 27902801

Achieving Plant CRISPR Targeting that Limits Off-Target Effects.

Jeffrey D Wolt, Kan Wang, Dipali Sashital, Carolyn J Lawrence-Dill.   

Abstract

The CRISPR-Cas9 system (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats with associated Cas9 protein) has been used to generate targeted changes for direct modification of endogenous genes in an increasing number of plant species; but development of plant genome editing has not yet fully considered potential off-target mismatches that may lead to unintended changes within the genome. Assessing the specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 for increasing editing efficiency as well as the potential for unanticipated downstream effects from off-target mutations is an important regulatory consideration for agricultural applications. Increasing genome-editing specificity entails developing improved design methods that better predict the prevalence of off-target mutations as a function of genome composition and design of the engineered ribonucleoprotein (RNP). Early results from CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in plant systems indicate that the incidence of off-target mutation frequencies is quite low; however, by analyzing CRISPR-edited plant lines and improving both computational tools and reagent design, it may be possible to further decrease unanticipated effects at potential mismatch sites within the genome. This will provide assurance that CRISPR-Cas9 reagents can be designed and targeted with a high degree of specificity. Improved and experimentally validated design tools for discriminating target and potential off-target positions that incorporate consideration of the designed nuclease fidelity and selectivity will help to increase confidence for regulatory decision making for genome-edited plants.
Copyright © 2016 Crop Science Society of America.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27902801     DOI: 10.3835/plantgenome2016.05.0047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Genome        ISSN: 1940-3372            Impact factor:   4.089


  21 in total

1.  CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient editing in phytoene desaturase (PDS) demonstrates precise manipulation in banana cv. Rasthali genome.

Authors:  Navneet Kaur; Anshu Alok; Navjot Kaur; Pankaj Pandey; Praveen Awasthi; Siddharth Tiwari
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.410

2.  Current risk assessment approaches for environmental and food and feed safety assessment.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  A research program for the socioeconomic impacts of gene editing regulation.

Authors:  Agustina I Whelan; Martin A Lema
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.074

4.  Plant Genome Editing and the Relevance of Off-Target Changes.

Authors:  Nathaniel Graham; Gunvant B Patil; David M Bubeck; Raymond C Dobert; Kevin C Glenn; Annie T Gutsche; Sandeep Kumar; John A Lindbo; Luis Maas; Gregory D May; Miguel E Vega-Sanchez; Robert M Stupar; Peter L Morrell
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Lessons for a SECURE Future: Evaluating Diversity in Crop Biotechnology Across Regulatory Regimes.

Authors:  Dalton R George; Eli D Hornstein; Carrie A Clower; Allison L Coomber; DeShae Dillard; Nassib Mugwanya; Daniela T Pezzini; Casey Rozowski
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-02

Review 6.  New breeding technique "genome editing" for crop improvement: applications, potentials and challenges.

Authors:  Supriya B Aglawe; Kalyani M Barbadikar; Satendra K Mangrauthia; M Sheshu Madhav
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 7.  Gene Editing of Microalgae: Scientific Progress and Regulatory Challenges in Europe.

Authors:  Andrew Spicer; Attila Molnar
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-06

8.  Transient Expression of CRISPR/Cas9 Machinery Targeting TcNPR3 Enhances Defense Response in Theobroma cacao.

Authors:  Andrew S Fister; Lena Landherr; Siela N Maximova; Mark J Guiltinan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 9.  Prospects of Understanding the Molecular Biology of Disease Resistance in Rice.

Authors:  Pankaj Kumar Singh; Akshay Nag; Preeti Arya; Ritu Kapoor; Akshay Singh; Rajdeep Jaswal; Tilak Raj Sharma
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Variation in Mutation Spectra Among CRISPR/Cas9 Mutagenized Poplars.

Authors:  Estefania Elorriaga; Amy L Klocko; Cathleen Ma; Steven H Strauss
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.