| Literature DB >> 27902749 |
Han Chan1, Yan-Ling Tang1, Xiao-Hang Lv1, Gao-Fu Zhang1, Mo Wang1, Hai-Ping Yang1, Qiu Li1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27902749 PMCID: PMC5130272 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167346
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flowchart of selection process for eligible studies (PRISMA 2009 flow diagram).
Basic characteristics of included studies
| Year | Setting | Ethnicity | HSPN/HSP | Age HSPN/HSP, y | Risk factors | Criterion | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shin [ | 2006 | Korea | Asian | 78/128 | 8.2 ± 3.1/6.7 ± 2.6 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 17 | ACR |
| Jauhola [ | 2015 | Finland | Caucasian | 102/121 | 8.2 ± 3.8/6.2 ± 3.0 | 1 2 4 7 8 13 14 15 16 | ACR |
| Zhao [ | 2015 | China | Asian | 45/96 | 7.8 ± 2.6 | 1 2 3 4 7 10 11 12 13 17 | EULAR |
| Elmas [ | 2014 | Turkey | Caucasian | 28/79 | 8.7 ± 4.1/7.1 ± 3.0 | 1 2 7 9 10 11 13 14 16 | EULAR |
| Mao [ | 2014 | China | Asian | 267/268 | 7.5 ± 2.7/6.4 ± 2.5 | 1 2 7 9 10 11 14 16 | EULAR |
| Anil [ | 2011 | Turkey | Caucasian | 192/238 | 7.9 ± 2.8/7.5 ± 2.8 | 1 2 6 8 9 11 13 | ACR |
| Zhu [ | 2014 | China | Asian | 80/38 | 10.41 ± 2.70 | 1 2 7 8 9 14 15 17 | ACR |
| Mariac [ | 2001 | Spain | Caucasian | 8/61 | 6.9 ± 2.2/6.1 ± 3.3 | 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 13 14 | ACR |
| Kawasaki [ | 2003 | Japan | Asian | 15/69 | 9.6 ± 3.7/8.7 ± 3.1 | 1 4 7 14 16 17 | ACR |
| Limpongsanurak [ | 2011 | Thailand | Asian | 11/156 | 6.9 ± 2.6 | 5 7 12 | ACR |
| Luiz [ | 2007 | Brazil | Caucasian | 70/72 | —— | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 14 | ACR |
| Wang [ | 2016 | China | Asian | 37/34 | 8.6 ± 2.1 | 1 2 7 11 14 | EULAR |
| Nickavar [ | 2012 | Iran | Caucasian | 41/64 | 7.3 ± 2.6/5.3 ± 2.7 | 2 5 7 | EULAR |
a All studies were case-control studies
b Risk factor key: 1, age; 2, gender; 3, persistent purpura; 4, abdominal pain; 5, severe bowel angina; 6, gastrointestinal bleeding; 7, arthritis/arthralgia; 8, relapse; 9, leukocytosis; 10, thrombocytosis; 11, CRP; 12, ASO; 13, ESR; 14, IgA; 15, IgE; 16, IgG; 17, C3.
Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (case-control) for studies included in this meta-analysis
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Was the case definition adequate | ||||||||||||||
| Representativeness of the case | ||||||||||||||
| Selection of controls | ||||||||||||||
| Definition of controls | ||||||||||||||
| Comparability | ||||||||||||||
| Ascertainment of exposure | ||||||||||||||
| Ascertainment for cases & controls | ||||||||||||||
| Non-response rate | ||||||||||||||
| Score | 7 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
*Scored points
Results of meta-analysis by system
| Possible risk factors | Inconclusive | Results | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Older age WMD = 0.90,95% CI (0.61–1.19), P = 0.00 | ||
| >10 year-old = 3.13,95% CI (1.39–7.07), | |||
| Boy | OR = 1.36,95% CI (1.07–1.74), | ||
| Girl | OR = 1.15,95% CI (0.77–1.71), | ||
| Digestive tract | Abdominal pain | OR = 1.94,95% CI (1.24–3.04), | |
| Gastrointestinal bleeding | OR = 1.86,95% CI (1.30–2.65), | ||
| Severe bowel angina | OR = 3.38,95% CI (1.17–9.80), | ||
| Skeletal | Arthritis/arthralgia | OR = 1.41,95% CI (1.01–1.96), | |
| Dermal | Persistent purpura | OR = 4.02,95% CI (1.22–13.25), | |
| Relapse | OR = 4.70,95% CI (2.42–9.14), | ||
| Blood pressure | OR = 1.10,95% CI (0.63–1.92), | ||
| Orchitis | OR = 0.94,95% CI (0.30–2.94), | ||
| Routine blood test | WBC > 15 × 109/L | OR = 2.42,95% CI (1.39–4.22), | |
| PLT > 500 × 109/L | OR = 2.98,95% CI (1.22–7.25), | ||
| Positive ASO | OR = 2.17,95% CI (1.29–3.64), | ||
| Elevated ESR | OR = 0.90,95% CI (0.65–1.23), | ||
| Elevated CRP | OR = 1.33,95% CI (0.77–2.28), | ||
| Immunologic function | Elevated IgA | OR = 1.24,95% CI (0.65–2.37), | |
| Elevated IgE | OR = 1.06,95% CI (0.45–2.49), | ||
| Elevated IgG | OR = 0.65,95% CI (0.22–1.90), | ||
| Decreased C3 | OR = 3.13,95% CI (1.62–6.05), |
Fig 2Forest plots of OR/WMD estimates for the following risk factors: (A) age; (B) gender: (C) older age
Fig 5Forest plots of OR estimates for the following risk factors: IgA; IgE; IgG; C3
Fig 6Result of sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis on arthritis/ arthralgia.
Fig 7Result of sensitivity analysis on abdominal pain.
Fig 8Forest plots of OR estimates for abdominal pain after the deletion of an unstable study.
Fig 9Assessment of Publication bias using (A) Egger’s and (B) Begg’s test.
Fig 3Forest plots of OR estimates for the following risk factors: abdominal pain; gastrointestinal bleeding; severe bowel angina; arthritis or arthralgia; blood pressure; orchitis; persistent purpura; relapse
Fig 4Forest plots of OR estimates for the following risk factors: ASO; CRP; ESR; leukocytosis; thrombocytosis