| Literature DB >> 27901064 |
Raúl M Luque1,2,3,4,5, José Cordoba-Chacon1,2,3,4,5,6, Ana I Pozo-Salas1,2,3,4,5, Begoña Porteiro4,7, Luis de Lecea8, Rubén Nogueiras4,7, Manuel D Gahete1,2,3,4,5, Justo P Castaño1,2,3,4,5.
Abstract
Somatostatin (SST) and cortistatin (CORT) regulate numerous endocrine secretions and their absence [knockout (KO)-models] causes important endocrine-metabolic alterations, including pituitary dysregulations. We have demonstrated that the metabolic phenotype of single or combined SST/CORT KO-models is not drastically altered under normal conditions. However, the biological actions of SST/CORT are conditioned by the metabolic-status (e.g. obesity). Therefore, we used male/female SST- and CORT-KO mice fed low-fat (LF) or high-fat (HF) diet to explore the interplay between SST/CORT and obesity in the control of relevant pituitary-axes and whole-body metabolism. Our results showed that the SST/CORT role in the control of GH/prolactin secretions is maintained under LF- and HF-diet conditions as SST-KOs presented higher GH/prolactin-levels, while CORT-KOs displayed higher GH- and lower prolactin-levels than controls under both diets. Moreover, the impact of lack of SST/CORT on the metabolic-function was gender- and diet-dependent. Particularly, SST-KOs were more sensitive to HF-diet, exhibiting altered growth and body-composition (fat/lean percentage) and impaired glucose/insulin-metabolism, especially in males. Conversely, only males CORT-KO under LF-diet conditions exhibited significant alterations, displaying higher glucose-levels and insulin-resistance. Altogether, these data demonstrate a tight interplay between SST/CORT-axis and the metabolic status in the control of endocrine/metabolic functions and unveil a clear dissociation of SST/CORT roles.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27901064 PMCID: PMC5128804 DOI: 10.1038/srep37992
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Growth rate and food intake of male and female, LF- and HF-fed, SST-KO, CORT-KO and control mice.
Female (A) and male (B) SST-KO, CORT-KO and control (WT) mice were fed a LF- of a HF-diet starting at 4 weeks of age and body weights were recorder weekly until sacrifice (14–16 weeks of diet). Statistical differences were assessed by two-way ANOVA within genotype and gender followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test within each time point [significant differences are indicated by *(WT-LF vs. WT-HF) or #(KO-LF vs. KO-HF)]. (C) Food intake was estimated at 15–17 weeks of age (11–13 weeks of diet) by daily weighting food provided and withdrawn during 7 consecutive days. Statistical differences were assessed by two-way ANOVA within genotype and gender followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test [significant differences between LF- and HF-fed mice are indicated by asterisks (***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05). Data represent MEM ± SEM of n = 6–12 mice per gender, diet and genotype.
Figure 2Body, visceral and subcutaneous fat depots and liver weights of male and female, LF- and HF-fed, SST-KO, CORT-KO and control mice.
Body (A), visceral (B) and subcutaneous (C) fat depots and liver (D) weights of female and male SST-KO, CORT-KO and control (WT) mice fed a LF- of a HF-diet were recorder at sacrifice (14–16 weeks of diet). Statistical differences were assessed by two-way ANOVA within genotype and gender (indicated below each graph) followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test [significant differences between LF- and HF-fed or between WT and KO mice are indicated by asterisks (***p<0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05)]. Data represent MEM ± SEM of n = 6–12 mice per gender, diet and genotype.
Figure 3GH, IGF-I and prolactin (PRL) levels of male and female, LF- and HF-fed, SST-KO, CORT-KO and control mice.
GH (A), IGF-I (B) and PRL (C) levels of female and male SST-KO, CORT-KO and control (WT) mice fed a LF- of a HF-diet determined at sacrifice (14–16 weeks of diet). Statistical differences were assessed by two-way ANOVA within genotype and gender (indicated below each graph) followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test [significant differences between LF- and HF-fed or between WT and KO mice are indicated by asterisks (***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05)]. Data represent MEM ± SEM of n = 6–12 mice per gender, diet and genotype.
Figure 4Dynamic glucose tolerance test on male and female, LF- and HF-fed, SST-KO, CORT-KO and control mice.
Glucose tolerance tests (GTTs) were performed at 16–18 weeks of age (12–14 weeks of diet) after an overnight fast (2 g/kg glucose, ip) on female and male SST-KO, CORT-KO and control (WT) mice. Statistical differences were assessed by two-way ANOVA within genotype and gender followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test within each time point [significant differences are indicated by *(WT-LF vs. WT-HF), #(KO-LF vs. KO-HF) or $(WT-HF vs. KO-HF)]. Data represent MEM ± SEM of n = 6–12 mice per gender, diet and genotype.
Figure 5Dynamic insulin tolerance test on male and female, LF- and HF-fed, SST-KO, CORT-KO and control mice.
Insulin tolerance tests (ITTs) were performed at 17–19 weeks of age (13–15 weeks of diet) under ad libitum fed conditions (1 U/kg Novolin, ip) on female and male SST-KO, CORT-KO and control (WT) mice. Statistical differences were assessed by two-way ANOVA within genotype and gender followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test within each time point [significant differences are indicated by *(WT-LF vs. WT-HF), #(KO-LF vs. KO-HF) or &(WT-LF vs. KO-LF)]. Data represent MEM ± SEM of n = 6–12 mice per gender, diet and genotype.
Summary of the endocrine-metabolic parameters determined in female and male SST-KO, CORT-KO and control (WT) mice fed a LF- of a HF-diet.
| SST-KO | CORT-KO | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Females | Males | Females | Males | |||||
| LFD | HFD | LFD | HFD | LFD | HFD | LFD | HFD | |
| Body weight gain | ||||||||
| Food intake | ||||||||
| Body weight (sacrifice) | ||||||||
| Visceral fat weight | ||||||||
| Subcutaneous fat weight | ||||||||
| Plasma Leptin levels | ||||||||
| Liver weight | ||||||||
| Pancreas weight | ||||||||
| Plasma GH levels | ||||||||
| Pituitary GH expression | ||||||||
| Hypothalamic Ghrelin expression | ||||||||
| Hypothalamic GHRH expression | ||||||||
| Liver MUP3 expression | ||||||||
| Liver PRL-R expression | ||||||||
| Plasma IGF-I levels | ||||||||
| Liver IGF-I exxpressiion | ||||||||
| Plasma PRL levels | ||||||||
| Pituitary PRL expression | ||||||||
| GTT | ||||||||
| AUC GTT | ||||||||
| ITT | ||||||||
| AUC ITT | ||||||||
| Fasting Glucose levels | ||||||||
| Fed Glucose levels | ||||||||
| Fed Insulin levels | ||||||||
↑ and ↓ indicate significant changes compared to sex and diet matched wild-type controls.
indicate non-significant tendencies compared to sex and diet matched wild-type controls.