Literature DB >> 27900768

Is nonabsorbable nasal packing after septoplasty essential? A meta-analysis.

Jong Seung Kim1,2, Sam Hyun Kwon1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Septoplasty is one of the most frequently performed rhinologic surgeries. Complications include nasal bleeding, pain, headache, septal hematoma, synechia, infection, residual septal deviation, and septal perforation. In this study, we aimed to compare complication rates among patients according to packing method.
METHODS: We performed a literature search using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through August 2016. Our systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Random effect models were used to calculate risk differences and risk ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Cases referred to the nonpacking group included patients treated with transseptal sutures or septal splints. Cases referred to as the packing group included patients treated with nonabsorbable packing such as Merocel or gauze.
RESULTS: Our search included 20 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 1,321 subjects in the nonpacking group and 1,247 subjects in the packing group. There were no significant differences between packing methods regarding bleeding, hematoma, perforation, infection, and residual septal deviation. The risk differences of postoperative pain, headache, and postoperative synechia were -0.50 [95% CI: -0.93 to -0.07, P = .02], -0.42 [95% CI: -0.66 to -0.19, P = .0004], and -0.03 [95% CI: -0.06 to -0.01, P = .01], respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Nonabsorbable nasal packing is no more effective than treatments without packing after septoplasty. Septal splints and transseptal sutures reduce postoperative pain, headache, and synechia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1B Laryngoscope, 127:1026-1031, 2017.
© 2016 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nasal septum; complications; packing; septoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27900768     DOI: 10.1002/lary.26436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  6 in total

1.  Safety of (rhino)septoplasty without nasal packing in routine ENT practice.

Authors:  Nancy Seghers; Stéphane Ledeghen; Stéphanie Collet; Jean-Christophe Degols
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Nasal silicone splints and quilting sutures using a septum stitch device following septoplasty: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Akihito Kuboki; Shun Kikuchi; Daiya Asaka; Nobuto Onda; Tsuguhisa Nakayama; Hiromi Kojima; Nobuyoshi Otori
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Invited Discussion on: Comparison of the Ankaferd Blood Stopper Tampon and the Merocel Nasal Tampon after Septoplasty Surgery.

Authors:  Robert Gilman; Nishant Ganesh Kumar
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Septal and turbinate surgery: is overnight essential?

Authors:  Ana Sousa Menezes; Joana R Guimarães; Miguel Breda; Vicente Vieira; Luís Dias
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Is nasal septal suturing an alternative technique to nasal packing?: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dandan Wang; Ting Liu; Chao Liao; Guangjun Tang; Tian Tian; Li Tian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Effect of infiltrating nasal packing with local anesthetics in postoperative pain and anxiety following sinonasal surgeries: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shao-Chen Tsai; Ming-Tang Lai; Yi-Lin Kao; Chia-Che Wu
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.