Hendrik J Boiten1, Jan C van den Berge2, Roelf Valkema3, Ron T van Domburg2, Felix Zijlstra2, Arend F L Schinkel2. 1. Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Thoraxcenter Room Ba304, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. henkjan_boiten@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is not entirely clear whether ischemia burden on stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) effectively identifies patients who have a long-term benefit from coronary revascularization. METHODS: The study population consisted of 719 patients with ischemia on stress SPECT. Early coronary revascularization was defined as percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting ≤90 days after SPECT. Patients who underwent late revascularization (>90 days after SPECT) were excluded (n = 164). RESULTS: Of the 538 patients (73% men, mean age 59.8 ± 11 years), 348 patients had low ischemia burden (<3 ischemic segments) and 190 patients had moderate to high ischemia burden (≥3 ischemic segments). A total of 76 patients underwent early revascularization. During a median follow-up of 12 years (range 4-17), 283 patients died of whom 125 due to cardiac causes. Early revascularization was beneficial on all-cause mortality (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30-0.46) and cardiac mortality (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.29-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with myocardial ischemia on stress SPECT who underwent early revascularization had a lower all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality during long-term follow-up as compared to patients who received pharmacological therapy alone. This difference in long-term outcomes was mainly influenced by the survival benefit of early revascularization in the patients with moderate to high ischemia burden.
BACKGROUND: It is not entirely clear whether ischemia burden on stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) effectively identifies patients who have a long-term benefit from coronary revascularization. METHODS: The study population consisted of 719 patients with ischemia on stress SPECT. Early coronary revascularization was defined as percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting ≤90 days after SPECT. Patients who underwent late revascularization (>90 days after SPECT) were excluded (n = 164). RESULTS: Of the 538 patients (73% men, mean age 59.8 ± 11 years), 348 patients had low ischemia burden (<3 ischemic segments) and 190 patients had moderate to high ischemia burden (≥3 ischemic segments). A total of 76 patients underwent early revascularization. During a median follow-up of 12 years (range 4-17), 283 patients died of whom 125 due to cardiac causes. Early revascularization was beneficial on all-cause mortality (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30-0.46) and cardiac mortality (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.29-0.99). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with myocardial ischemia on stress SPECT who underwent early revascularization had a lower all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality during long-term follow-up as compared to patients who received pharmacological therapy alone. This difference in long-term outcomes was mainly influenced by the survival benefit of early revascularization in the patients with moderate to high ischemia burden.
Entities:
Keywords:
Early revascularization; SPECT; ischemia; long-term
Authors: Stephan D Fihn; James C Blankenship; Karen P Alexander; John A Bittl; John G Byrne; Barbara J Fletcher; Gregg C Fonarow; Richard A Lange; Glenn N Levine; Thomas M Maddox; Srihari S Naidu; E Magnus Ohman; Peter K Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-07-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: John J V McMurray; Stamatis Adamopoulos; Stefan D Anker; Angelo Auricchio; Michael Böhm; Kenneth Dickstein; Volkmar Falk; Gerasimos Filippatos; Cândida Fonseca; Miguel Angel Gomez-Sanchez; Tiny Jaarsma; Lars Køber; Gregory Y H Lip; Aldo Pietro Maggioni; Alexander Parkhomenko; Burkert M Pieske; Bogdan A Popescu; Per K Rønnevik; Frans H Rutten; Juerg Schwitter; Petar Seferovic; Janina Stepinska; Pedro T Trindade; Adriaan A Voors; Faiez Zannad; Andreas Zeiher Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-05-19 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Leslee J Shaw; William S Weintraub; David J Maron; Pamela M Hartigan; Rory Hachamovitch; James K Min; Marcin Dada; G B John Mancini; Sean W Hayes; Robert A O'Rourke; John A Spertus; William Kostuk; Gilbert Gosselin; Bernard R Chaitman; Merill Knudtson; John Friedman; Piotr Slomka; Guido Germano; Eric R Bates; Koon K Teo; William E Boden; Daniel S Berman Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; L J Shaw; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; J Friedman; G A Diamond Journal: Circulation Date: 1998-02-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Robert L Frye; Phyllis August; Maria Mori Brooks; Regina M Hardison; Sheryl F Kelsey; Joan M MacGregor; Trevor J Orchard; Bernard R Chaitman; Saul M Genuth; Suzanne H Goldberg; Mark A Hlatky; Teresa L Z Jones; Mark E Molitch; Richard W Nesto; Edward Y Sako; Burton E Sobel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-06-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marisa C G Tjong Joe Wai; Machiel J M Ottenhof; Hendrik J Boiten; Roelf Valkema; Ron T van Domburg; Arend F L Schinkel Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; David J Maron; G B John Mancini; Sean W Hayes; Pamela M Hartigan; William S Weintraub; Robert A O'Rourke; Marcin Dada; John A Spertus; Bernard R Chaitman; John Friedman; Piotr Slomka; Gary V Heller; Guido Germano; Gilbert Gosselin; Peter Berger; William J Kostuk; Ronald G Schwartz; Merill Knudtson; Emir Veledar; Eric R Bates; Benjamin McCallister; Koon K Teo; William E Boden Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690