Juliana Pedro1,2, Maria Pedro Sobral1, Joana Mesquita-Guimarães3, Carla Leal3, Maria E Costa1,2, Mariana V Martins4,5. 1. Center for Psychology, University of Porto, R. Alfredo Allen, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal. 2. Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, R. Alfredo Allen, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal. 3. Reproductive Medicine Department, Porto Hospital Center, Largo da Maternidade, 4050-371, Porto, Portugal. 4. Center for Psychology, University of Porto, R. Alfredo Allen, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal. mmartins@fpce.up.pt. 5. Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, R. Alfredo Allen, 4200-135, Porto, Portugal. mmartins@fpce.up.pt.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aims to explore the role of infertility-psychosocial variables on treatment discontinuation after controlling for demographic and biomedical variables in couples seeking reimbursed fertility treatment. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in 139 couples seeking fertility treatment. Between February 2010 and March 2011, participants completed measures of anxiety (STAI-State), depression (BDI-II), infertility-stress (FPI), and infertility coping strategies (COMPI-CSS). Medical data related to diagnosis, treatment, and discontinuation were collected in December 2013. A multiple logistic regression was performed to identify the predictors of discontinuation. RESULTS: The discontinuation rate was 29.5%. Female education level, engagement in ART procedures, and female causation decreased the likelihood of treatment discontinuation, whereas female age and depression increased the likelihood of discontinuation. Female depression was the strongest predictor in this model. The model correctly identified 75.5% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Female age and female depression are associated with a higher likelihood of treatment discontinuation in couples seeking treatment. Reproductive health professionals should therefore inform couples about the link between the fertility treatment discontinuation and both female age and female depression. Couples in which female partners present clinically relevant depression should be referred to a mental health professional to prevent premature abandonment of fertility treatments and thus increase success rates.
PURPOSE: This study aims to explore the role of infertility-psychosocial variables on treatment discontinuation after controlling for demographic and biomedical variables in couples seeking reimbursed fertility treatment. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in 139 couples seeking fertility treatment. Between February 2010 and March 2011, participants completed measures of anxiety (STAI-State), depression (BDI-II), infertility-stress (FPI), and infertility coping strategies (COMPI-CSS). Medical data related to diagnosis, treatment, and discontinuation were collected in December 2013. A multiple logistic regression was performed to identify the predictors of discontinuation. RESULTS: The discontinuation rate was 29.5%. Female education level, engagement in ART procedures, and female causation decreased the likelihood of treatment discontinuation, whereas female age and depression increased the likelihood of discontinuation. Female depression was the strongest predictor in this model. The model correctly identified 75.5% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Female age and female depression are associated with a higher likelihood of treatment discontinuation in couples seeking treatment. Reproductive health professionals should therefore inform couples about the link between the fertility treatment discontinuation and both female age and female depression. Couples in which female partners present clinically relevant depression should be referred to a mental health professional to prevent premature abandonment of fertility treatments and thus increase success rates.
Entities:
Keywords:
Discontinuation; Dropout; Fertility treatments; Mental health
Authors: M Brandes; J O M van der Steen; S B Bokdam; C J C M Hamilton; J P de Bruin; W L D M Nelen; J A M Kremer Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2009-09-26 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Inge W H van Empel; Rosella P M G Hermens; Reinier P Akkermans; Kees W P Hollander; Willianne L D M Nelen; Jan A M Kremer Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2010-09-18 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Angelique Van Dongen; Aleida G Huppelschoten; Jan A M Kremer; Willianne L D M Nelen; Christianne M Verhaak Journal: Hum Fertil (Camb) Date: 2015-01-19 Impact factor: 2.767
Authors: Inge W H van Empel; Johanna W M Aarts; Ben J Cohlen; Dana A Huppelschoten; Joop S E Laven; Willianne L D M Nelen; Jan A M Kremer Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2010-08-18 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Anna M Modest; Lauren A Wise; Matthew P Fox; Jennifer Weuve; Alan S Penzias; Michele R Hacker Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Giulia Casu; Victor Zaia; Erik Montagna; Antonio de Padua Serafim; Bianca Bianco; Caio Parente Barbosa; Paola Gremigni Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-01-13