Literature DB >> 27900529

Effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants bonded with different adhesive systems: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Gizem Erbas Unverdi1, Stephan Atilla Atac2, Zafer Cavit Cehreli2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the clinical retention of a resin-based fissure sealant placed with an intermediate layer of etch-and-rinse (ER) or self-etch (SE) adhesives.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred twenty-eight sealants were placed in 57 children with previously unsealed, caries-free permanent first molars, employing a split-mouth design. The teeth were randomized into four groups (n = 57 teeth/groups) according to the adhesive system placed under the tested sealant (Delton FS+; Dentsply). Group 1 (control): no bonding agent (conventional acid-etch sealant); group 2: prior enamel etch + ER adhesive (XP Bond; Dentsply); group 3: SE adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond; Kuraray) without prior etching; and group 4: prior enamel etch + SE adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond). Clinical assessments were performed according to modified USPHS criteria at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The data were analyzed statistically using Fisher's Exact test, the Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the Log-rank test.
RESULTS: At 24 months, sealants bonded with XP Bond and Clearfil SE Bond with prior enamel etching showed similar retention rates (p > 0.05), and these rates were significantly better than the rates of the conventional sealant and Clearfil-SE groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the retention rates of the latter two groups (p > 0.05). The cumulative survival rates on palatal/buccal surfaces showed similar outcomes as with occlusal surfaces: XP Bond (94%), Clearfil SE Bond + acid-etch (94%), conventional sealant (52%), and Clearfil SE Bond only (37%).
CONCLUSIONS: Application of the tested ER adhesive and the SE adhesive with enamel etching significantly improved the clinical retention of Delton-FS over the 24-month period. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of a resin-based fissure sealant placed with ER or SE adhesive with prior acid-etching yielded better retention than the conventional sealant over the 24-month period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adhesive systems; Clinical study; Fissure sealant; Intermediate bonding layer; Retention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27900529     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-2016-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  32 in total

1.  Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Bart Van Meerbeek; Jan De Munck; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Satoshi Inoue; Marcos Vargas; Padmini Vijay; Kirsten Van Landuyt; Paul Lambrechts; Guido Vanherle
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.440

2.  Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel.

Authors:  Jorge Perdigão; Saulo Geraldeli
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.843

3.  Use of a bonding agent to reduce sealant sensitivity to moisture contamination: an in vitro study.

Authors:  J C Hitt; R J Feigal
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.874

4.  Clinical performance of sealants with and without a bonding agent.

Authors:  Arzu Pinar; Elif Sepet; Gamze Aren; Nilüfer Bölükbaşi; Hasmet Ulukapi; Nurten Turan
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.677

5.  Effect of individual or simultaneous curing on sealant bond strength.

Authors:  Carolina Paes Torres; Patrícia Balbo; Jaciara Miranda Gomes-Silva; Renata Pereira Ramos; Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb; Maria Cristina Borsatto
Journal:  J Dent Child (Chic)       Date:  2005 Jan-Apr

Review 6.  Sealants and preventive restorations: review of effectiveness and clinical changes for improvement.

Authors:  R J Feigal
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.874

7.  Effects of contamination and mechanical disturbance on the quality of acid-etched enamel.

Authors:  A A Hormati; J L Fuller; G E Denehy
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.634

8.  Quantitative microleakage evaluation of fissure sealants applied with or without a bonding agent: results after four-year water storage in vitro.

Authors:  Z C Cehreli; H C Gungor
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Aggressiveness of self-etch adhesives on unground enamel.

Authors:  Franklin R Tay; D H Pashley; N M King; R M Carvalho; J Tsai; S C N Lai; L Marquezini
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.440

Review 10.  Longevity of materials for pit and fissure sealing--results from a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jan Kühnisch; Ulrich Mansmann; Roswitha Heinrich-Weltzien; Reinhard Hickel
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 5.304

View more
  4 in total

1.  Sealing effectiveness of fissure sealant bonded with universal adhesive systems on saliva-contaminated and noncontaminated enamel.

Authors:  Mahtab Memarpour; Fereshteh Shafiei; Mehran Zarean; Faranak Razmjoei
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-01-01

Review 2.  Pit and Fissure Sealants-A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Barbara Cvikl; Andreas Moritz; Katrin Bekes
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-12

3.  Using self-etch adhesive agents with pit and fissure sealants. In vitro analysis of shear bond strength, adhesive remnant index and enamel etching patterns.

Authors:  I Mézquita-Rodrigo; R J Scougall-Vilchis; M A Moyaho-Bernal; L E Rodríguez-Vilchis; E Rubio-Rosas; R Contreras-Bulnes
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2021-08-07

4.  Microleakage of pit and fissure sealings placed after enamel conditioning with phosphoric acid or with self-etching primers/adhesives.

Authors:  Stefanie Amend; Roland Frankenberger; Christina Boutsiouki; Vanessa Scharrelmann; Julia Winter; Norbert Krämer
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2021-04-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.