Hisahiro Hosogi1, Hisashi Shinohara2, Shigeru Tsunoda2, Shigeo Hisamori2, Hitoshi Sumida2, Koya Hida2, Kazutaka Obama2,3, Hiroshi Okabe2,4, Yoshiharu Sakai2. 1. Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. hisahoso@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp. 2. Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. 3. Department of Surgery, Kyoto City Hospital, Kyoto, Japan. 4. Department of Surgery, Otsu Municipal Hospital, Otsu, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although the use of staging laparoscopy (SL) for detecting peritoneal metastasis (P) and determining peritoneal lavage cytology (CY) is widespread in advanced gastric cancer, an indication for SL based on preoperative clinicopathological factors is controversial. METHODS: From May 2006 to September 2015, 120 patients with advanced gastric cancer with primary tumors ≥5 cm and/or with bulky regional lymph nodes (bulky N) underwent SL for assessment of P/CY status. Clinicopathological factors were analyzed retrospectively to determine their influence on peritoneal spread (P1 and/or CY1). An additional analysis of 379 consecutive patients with clinically T2 or deeper gastric cancer in the same time period was carried out to confirm the SL results. RESULTS: Peritoneal spread was confirmed by SL in 54 cases (45%). The presence of type-4 tumors (n = 38, p < 0.0001) and diffuse-type tumors (n = 85, p = 0.04) correlated significantly with peritoneal spread. These two factors were also correlated significantly with increased peritoneal spread in a subgroup analysis among patients with tumors with bulky N (n = 44). The additional analysis of 379 patients showed results consistent with the SL results. The frequency of peritoneal spread was 78% among type-4 tumors, 47% among diffuse-type tumors ≥5 cm, and 38% among diffuse-type tumors with bulky N, whereas among intestinal-type tumors, it was 18% in tumors ≥5 cm and 13% among tumors with bulky N. CONCLUSIONS: Among tumors ≥5 cm or with bulky N, type-4 tumors and diffuse-type tumors had a high potential for peritoneal spread and patients with such tumors were considered more suitable candidates for SL.
PURPOSE: Although the use of staging laparoscopy (SL) for detecting peritoneal metastasis (P) and determining peritoneal lavage cytology (CY) is widespread in advanced gastric cancer, an indication for SL based on preoperative clinicopathological factors is controversial. METHODS: From May 2006 to September 2015, 120 patients with advanced gastric cancer with primary tumors ≥5 cm and/or with bulky regional lymph nodes (bulky N) underwent SL for assessment of P/CY status. Clinicopathological factors were analyzed retrospectively to determine their influence on peritoneal spread (P1 and/or CY1). An additional analysis of 379 consecutive patients with clinically T2 or deeper gastric cancer in the same time period was carried out to confirm the SL results. RESULTS: Peritoneal spread was confirmed by SL in 54 cases (45%). The presence of type-4 tumors (n = 38, p < 0.0001) and diffuse-type tumors (n = 85, p = 0.04) correlated significantly with peritoneal spread. These two factors were also correlated significantly with increased peritoneal spread in a subgroup analysis among patients with tumors with bulky N (n = 44). The additional analysis of 379 patients showed results consistent with the SL results. The frequency of peritoneal spread was 78% among type-4 tumors, 47% among diffuse-type tumors ≥5 cm, and 38% among diffuse-type tumors with bulky N, whereas among intestinal-type tumors, it was 18% in tumors ≥5 cm and 13% among tumors with bulky N. CONCLUSIONS: Among tumors ≥5 cm or with bulky N, type-4 tumors and diffuse-type tumors had a high potential for peritoneal spread and patients with such tumors were considered more suitable candidates for SL.
Authors: Jaffer A Ajani; David J Bentrem; Stephen Besh; Thomas A D'Amico; Prajnan Das; Crystal Denlinger; Marwan G Fakih; Charles S Fuchs; Hans Gerdes; Robert E Glasgow; James A Hayman; Wayne L Hofstetter; David H Ilson; Rajesh N Keswani; Lawrence R Kleinberg; W Michael Korn; A Craig Lockhart; Kenneth Meredith; Mary F Mulcahy; Mark B Orringer; James A Posey; Aaron R Sasson; Walter J Scott; Vivian E Strong; Thomas K Varghese; Graham Warren; Mary Kay Washington; Christopher Willett; Cameron D Wright; Nicole R McMillian; Hema Sundar Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Beate Rau; Linda Feldbrügge; Felix Gronau; Miguel Enrique Alberto Vilchez; Peter Thuss-Patience; Pierre Emmanuel Bonnot; Olivier Glehen Journal: Visc Med Date: 2022-02-23
Authors: Jordan J Nostedt; Clifford Sample; Sunita Ghosh; Simon R Turner; Lloyd Mack; Michael McCall; Daniel Schiller Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 2.840