Literature DB >> 2789948

Response to cytostatic treatment in inoperable adenocarcinoma of the lung: critical implications.

J B Sørensen1, J H Badsberg, H H Hansen.   

Abstract

The prognostic factors for response to chemotherapy and the prognostic impact of response status on survival, relative to other prognostic variables, were evaluated among 53 responding (9 complete responses; 44 partial responses) and 165 non-responding patients with inoperable adenocarcinoma of the lung (ACL). Multiple logistic regression analysis, including 27 pretreatment variables, revealed that the only significant predictor of response was bidimensionally measurable disease parameter (P = 0.02), followed by brain metastases that were negatively correlated to response, although insignificantly (P = 0.10). Univariate landmark analyses among patients alive at 8, 12, 16 and 24 weeks showed a trend towards better survival for responders compared with non-responders, but did not reach a significant level at any time (P values 0.78, 0.57, 0.23 and 0.12, respectively). Death hazard ratios for responders to non-responders were 0.91, 0.89, 0.79 and 0.73. Multivariate regression analysis among patients alive at 16 weeks demonstrated a significant impact on survival for performance status, non-radical tumour resection, liver metastases and LDH, while the impact of response status in comparison was weak and insignificant. This reflects the unsatisfactory treatment results achieved in inoperable ACL, with the majority of responses being partial, and calls for improvement of the cytostatic treatment currently available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2789948      PMCID: PMC2247192          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1989.291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  14 in total

1.  Frequency and prognostic importance of pretreatment clinical characteristics in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with combination chemotherapy.

Authors:  J P O'Connell; M G Kris; R J Gralla; S Groshen; A Trust; J J Fiore; D P Kelsen; R T Heelan; R B Golbey
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Differing response rates and survival between squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Comparison of CAP versus MAP.

Authors:  R T Eagan; S Frytak; E T Creagan; R L Richardson; D T Coles; J R Jett
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  Chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma: EST 2575, generation V--a randomized comparison of four cisplatin-containing regimens.

Authors:  J C Ruckdeschel; D M Finkelstein; B A Mason; R H Creech
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Comparing survival of responders and nonresponders after treatment: a potential source of confusion in interpreting cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  G B Weiss; H Bunce; J A Hokanson
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1983-03

5.  Commentary: current status of chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J Aisner; H H Hansen
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec

6.  Chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the lung (WHO III): A randomized study of vindesine versus lomustine, cyclophosphamide, and methotrexate versus all four drugs.

Authors:  J B Sørensen; H H Hansen; P Dombernowsky; E Bork; R Malmberg; K Aabo; B Bødker; M Hansen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Analysis of survival by tumor response.

Authors:  J R Anderson; K C Cain; R D Gelber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Evaluation of response criteria in advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  R T Eagan; T R Fleming; V Schoonover
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Influence of measurement error on assessment of response to anticancer chemotherapy: proposal for new criteria of tumor response.

Authors:  D Warr; S McKinney; I Tannock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  A critique of the role of the blood-brain barrier in the chemotherapy of human brain tumors.

Authors:  D J Stewart
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  Is there a role for vindesine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer?

Authors:  J B Sørensen; H H Hansen
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1993 May-Aug       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Characterization of a Real-World Response Variable and Comparison with RECIST-Based Response Rates from Clinical Trials in Advanced NSCLC.

Authors:  Xinran Ma; Lawrence Bellomo; Kelly Magee; Caroline S Bennette; Olga Tymejczyk; Meghna Samant; Melisa Tucker; Nathan Nussbaum; Bryan E Bowser; Joshua S Kraut; Ariel Bulua Bourla
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.845

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.