| Literature DB >> 27899136 |
Jessica Delhaye1, Consolée Aletti2, Olivier Glaizot3, Philippe Christe2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The intake of a Plasmodium-infected blood meal may affect mosquito physiology and a series of trade-offs may occur, in particular between immune defences, reproduction and self-maintenance. We evaluated the cost of exposure to Plasmodium in the mosquito vector by investigating the effect of exposure on fecundity and survival and the implication of immune and antioxidant defences in mediating this cost.Entities:
Keywords: Exposure; Malaria; Trade-off; Vector
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27899136 PMCID: PMC5129600 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1905-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Sample sizes of female (♀) mosquitoes obtained at the end of all the feeding sessions
| ♀ Fed on: | Exposure level | Total | Died naturally | Sacrificed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bird group | Bird parasitaemia | At 5 dpf | At 15 dpf | |||
| Uninfected | none | no exposure | 156 | 85 | 36 | 35 |
| Chronic | low | low exposure | 199 | 119 | 40 | 40 |
| Acute | high | high exposure | 162 | 83 | 40 | 39 |
| ♀ which did not take a blood meal | no exposure | 64 | 0 | 64 | ||
Sample sizes are given for females fed on the different bird groups (with corresponding parasiteamia and exposure level) and for unfed females. For each exposure level, the total sample size, as well as the sample size of females which died naturally and females which were sacrificed at 5 and at 15 days post-feeding (dpf, 0 dpf for unfed females) are given
Minimal adequate models for blood meal size, fecundity and survival
| Categorical exposure level: no – low – high exposure | Quantitative continuous exposure level: bird parasitaemia | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lmer | Estimate | SE |
|
| Lmer | Estimate | SE |
|
| ||
| Blood meal size (square-root transformed) | Blood meal size (square-root transformed) | ||||||||||
| Intercept | 0.17 | 0.87 | 0.20 | 0.845 | Intercept | 0.74 | 0.99 | 0.75 | 0.455 | ||
| Body size | 1.13 | 0.25 | 4.56 | < 0.001 | Body size | 0.95 | 0.29 | 3.32 | 0.001 | ||
| Bird parasitaemia | 0.14 | 0.06 | 2.40 | 0.016 | |||||||
| R2 m = 3.4%; R2 c = 19.1% | R2 m = 4.5%; R2 c = 10.8% | ||||||||||
| Clutch size | Clutch size | ||||||||||
| Intercept | -146.28 | 48.90 | -2.99 | 0.003 | Intercept | -147.60 | 54.87 | -2.69 | 0.008 | ||
| Body size | 74.58 | 14.58 | 5.24 | < 0.001 | Body size | 66.28 | 16.15 | 4.10 | < 0.001 | ||
| Blood meal size | 2.76 | 0.43 | 6.36 | < 0.001 | Blood meal size | 4.81 | 0.37 | 12.97 | < 0.001 | ||
| Exposure level | -30.08 | 16.65 | -1.82 | 0.076 | |||||||
| Blood meal : exposure | 2.15 | 0.72 | 2.95 | 0.006 | |||||||
| R2 m = 48.5%; R2 c = 50.6% | R2 m = 50.9%; R2 c = 52.5% | ||||||||||
| Coxme | Exp(coef.) | SE |
|
| Coxme | Exp(coef.) | SE |
|
| ||
| Survival | Survival | ||||||||||
| Clutch size | 1.01 | 0.001 | 10.29 | < 0.001 | Clutch size | 1.01 | 0.001 | 9.83 | < 0.001 | ||
| Glmer | Estimate | SE |
|
| Glmer | Estimate | SE |
|
| ||
| Laying probability | Laying probability | ||||||||||
| Intercept | -0.57 | 0.35 | -1.60 | 0.110 | Intercept | -0.56 | 0.33 | -1.67 | 0.094 | ||
| Blood meal size | 0.09 | 0.02 | 4.82 | < 0.001 | Blood meal size | 0.09 | 0.02 | 4.21 | < 0.001 | ||
| Exposure level | 0.064 | Bird parasitaemia | -0.45 | 0.16 | -2.86 | 0.004 | |||||
| R2 m = 18.9%; R2 c = 26.4% | R2 m = 18.2%; R2 c = 18.2% | ||||||||||
Each response variable (blood meal size, clutch size, survival and laying probability) was analysed with exposure level as a categorical variable (unexposed – low exposure – high exposure) and as a quantitative continuous variable (bird parasitaemia). Minimal adequate models, obtained after backward model selection based on likelihood ratio tests, are given with estimate or coefficient (exponential value, Exp(coef.)), standard error (SE), t- or z-value and P-value associated with each parameter in accordance with the performed models (lmer, coxme or glmer). Marginal and conditional R2 (R2 m and R2 c, respectively) were calculated for mixed effects models according to [63]
Fig. 1Laying probability as a function of blood meal size. Fecundity measured as laying probability (in percent) of females that died naturally as a function of blood meal size from the minimal adequate model given in Table 2. Circle size represents mosquito sample size (n)
Fig. 2Laying probability as a function of exposure to Plasmodium parasites. Fecundity measured as laying probability (in percent) as a function of a exposure level in females that died naturally, and b bird parasitaemia (circle size represents mosquito sample size) in exposed females that died naturally from the minimal adequate model given in Table 2
Fig. 3Clutch size as a function of blood meal size and exposure level. Fecundity measured as clutch size in females that oviposited as a function of blood meal size and exposure level from the minimal adequate model given in Table 2
Fig. 4Immune and antioxidant defences as a function of exposure level and days post- feeding. Gene expression levels of a nitric oxide synthase (NOS, log-transformed), b superoxide dismutase (SOD, log-transformed) and c glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH, log-transformed) in unfed female mosquitoes and in fed female mosquitoes: unexposed, with low exposure and with high exposure to Plasmodium parasites at 5 and 15 days post-feeding (dpf). Stars indicate significant statistical differences compared to unfed females at 0 dpf
Pearson correlations
| Gene | Correlation with | cor |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOS | SOD |
|
|
|
| G6PDH | 0.10 | 277 | 0.240 | |
| Body size | 0.10 | 286 | 0.240 | |
| Blood meal size | 0.04 | 223 | 0.650 | |
| Bird parasitaemia | 0.09 | 155 | 0.321 | |
| SOD | G6PDH |
|
|
|
| Body size | 0.08 | 289 | 0.321 | |
| Blood meal size | 0.12 | 226 | 0.240 | |
| Bird parasitaemia | 0.09 | 156 | 0.394 | |
| G6PDH | Body size | -0.07 | 280 | 0.321 |
| Blood meal size | 0.09 | 219 | 0.321 | |
| Bird parasitaemia | 0.01 | 152 | 0.915 |
For each gene expression level (log-transformed): nitric oxide synthase (NOS), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH), the correlation with the other genes, mosquito body size, blood meal size and bird parasitaemia (in exposed female mosquitoes) was tested. Correlation coefficient (cor), sample size (n), and P-value (adjusted for multiple comparisons) are given. Significant correlations are indicated in bold
Minimal adequate models for fecundity as a function of gene expression
| Lmer | Est. | SE | t-value | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clutch size | ||||
| Intercept | 160.53 | 9.09 | 17.67 | < 0.001 |
| NOS level | 16.62 | 6.21 | 2.68 | < 0.001 |
| R2 m = 11.3%; R2 c = 13.1% | ||||
| Glmer | ||||
| Laying probability | ||||
| Intercept | 5.47 | 1.84 | 2.97 | 0.003 |
| SOD level | -5.28 | 1.78 | -2.96 | 0.003 |
| Exposure level | -2.17 | 1.98 | -1.09 | 0.275 |
| SOD : exposure | 3.62 | 1.99 | 1.81 | 0.069 |
| R2 m = 58.8%; R2 c = 71.0% | ||||
For each response variable, clutch size and laying probability, minimal adequate models, obtained after backward model selection based on likelihood ratio tests, are given with estimate (Est.), standard error (SE), t- or z-value and P-value associated with each parameter in accordance with the performed models (lmer or glmer). Marginal and conditional R2 (R2 m and R2 c, respectively) were calculated according to [63]
Fig. 5Fecundity and gene expression in exposed females sacrificed at 15 days post-feeding. a Laying probability as a function of superoxide dismutase level (SOD, log-transformed) and exposure level from the minimal adequate model given in Table 4. Circle size represents mosquito sample size. b Clutch size as a function of nitric oxide synthase level (NOS, log-transformed) from the minimal adequate model given in Table 4