| Literature DB >> 29744700 |
Jessica Delhaye1, Olivier Glaizot2, Philippe Christe1.
Abstract
Host susceptibility to parasites is likely to be influenced by intrinsic factors, such as host oxidative status determined by the balance between pro-oxidant production and antioxidant defences. As a result, host oxidative status acts as an environmental factor for parasites and may constrain parasite development. We evaluated the role of host oxidative status on infection dynamics of an avian malarial parasite by providing canaries (Serinus canaria) with an antioxidant supplementation composed of vitamin E (a lipophilic antioxidant) and olive oil, a source of monounsaturated fatty acids. Another group received a standard, non-supplemented food. Half of the birds in each group where then infected with the haemosporidian parasite, Plasmodium relictum. We monitored the parasitaemia, haematocrit level, and red cell membrane resistance, as well as the transmission success of the parasite to its mosquito vector, Culex pipiens. During the acute phase, the negative effect of the infection was more severe in the supplemented group, as shown by a lower haematocrit level. Parasitaemia was lower in the supplemented group during the chronic phase only. Mosquitoes fed on supplemented hosts were more often infected than mosquitoes fed on the control group. These results suggest that dietary antioxidant supplementation conferred protection against Plasmodium in the long term, at the expense of a short-term negative effect. Malaria parasites may take advantage of antioxidants, as shown by the increased transmission rate in the supplemented group. Overall, our results suggest an important role of oxidative status in infection outcome and parasite transmission.Entities:
Keywords: Culex pipiens; Haemosporidian; Oxidative status; Plasmodium relictum; Serinus canaria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29744700 PMCID: PMC6006207 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-018-5869-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasitol Res ISSN: 0932-0113 Impact factor: 2.289
Parasitaemia (log transformed, arbitrary unit) in infected birds. The number of individuals (n), the repeated measurements (days post-infection), and the model type that were used are indicated. Minimal adequate model is given in bold with intercept as well as estimates, standard errors (se), t values, and p values for each specific significant terms. Non-significant terms tested are given with the p value of the likelihood ratio test before being dropped-out of the model
| Parasitaemia (log transformed) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linear mixed effect model | ||||
| Predictors | Estimate | se | ||
| Intercept | 2.5308 | 0.5028 | 5.03 | < 0.001 |
| Time | − 0.1137 | 0.0217 | − 5.25 | < 0.001 |
| Antioxidant | 0.2640 | 0.1026 | 2.57 | 0.021 |
| Sex | 0.793 | |||
| Time:antioxidant | − 0.0177 | 0.0072 | − 2.45 | 0.017 |
| Time:sex | 0.533 | |||
| Antioxidant:sex | 0.092 | |||
| (Time)2 | − 0.0069 | 0.0003 | − 24.30 | < 0.001 |
| (Time)2:antioxidant | 0.233 | |||
| (Time)3 | 0.0005 | 0.0001 | 8.93 | < 0.001 |
| (Time)3:antioxidant | 0.766 | |||
Infection probability in fed female mosquitoes. The number of individuals (n) and the model type that were used are indicated. Minimal adequate model is given in bold with intercept as well as estimates, standard errors (se), z values, and p values for each specific significant terms. Non-significant terms tested are given with the p value of the likelihood ratio test before being dropped-out of the model
| Infection probability | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generalised linear mixed effect model | ||||
| Estimate | se | |||
| Intercept | − 3.0165 | 0.7547 | − 4.00 | < 0.001 |
| Bird antioxidant treatment | 1.1488 | 0.5473 | 2.10 | 0.036 |
| Body size | 0.057 | |||
| Blood meal size | 0.067 | |||
| Bird parasitaemia | 0.216 | |||
Fig. 1Red blood cell membrane resistance to oxidative attack (mean ± standard error, in minutes) prior to and 1 month after the antioxidant treatment for control and supplemented groups. Non-significant (n.s.) and significant (*) differences are indicated
Fig. 2a Parasitaemia (log transformed, arbitrary units) in control and in supplemented infected birds as a function of days post infection. b Haematocrit (percent, %) as a function of antioxidant and infection treatments and days post infection
Fig. 3Red blood cell membrane resistance to oxidative attack (minutes) as a function of a days post-infection for uninfected and infected birds and b antioxidant and infection treatments (different letters indicate significant differences)
Fig. 4Prevalence of infected female mosquitoes (percent, %) as a function of the antioxidant treatment of the infected bird host. Sample sizes are given in brackets below each bar: the number of fed females and above each bar: the number of infected females. A star indicates a significant difference