Literature DB >> 27898889

Accuracies of genomic prediction of feed efficiency traits using different prediction and validation methods in an experimental Nelore cattle population.

R M O Silva, B O Fragomeni, D A L Lourenco, A F B Magalhães, N Irano, R Carvalheiro, R C Canesin, M E Z Mercadante, A A Boligon, F S Baldi, I Misztal, L G Albuquerque.   

Abstract

Animal feeding is the most important economic component of beef production systems. Selection for feed efficiency has not been effective mainly due to difficult and high costs to obtain the phenotypes. The application of genomic selection using SNP can decrease the cost of animal evaluation as well as the generation interval. The objective of this study was to compare methods for genomic evaluation of feed efficiency traits using different cross-validation layouts in an experimental beef cattle population genotyped for a high-density SNP panel (BovineHD BeadChip assay 700k, Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA). After quality control, a total of 437,197 SNP genotypes were available for 761 Nelore animals from the Institute of Animal Science, Sertãozinho, São Paulo, Brazil. The studied traits were residual feed intake, feed conversion ratio, ADG, and DMI. Methods of analysis were traditional BLUP, single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP), genomic BLUP (GBLUP), and a Bayesian regression method (BayesCπ). Direct genomic values (DGV) from the last 2 methods were compared directly or in an index that combines DGV with parent average. Three cross-validation approaches were used to validate the models: 1) YOUNG, in which the partition into training and testing sets was based on year of birth and testing animals were born after 2010; 2) UNREL, in which the data set was split into 3 less related subsets and the validation was done in each subset a time; and 3) RANDOM, in which the data set was randomly divided into 4 subsets (considering the contemporary groups) and the validation was done in each subset at a time. On average, the RANDOM design provided the most accurate predictions. Average accuracies ranged from 0.10 to 0.58 using BLUP, from 0.09 to 0.48 using GBLUP, from 0.06 to 0.49 using BayesCπ, and from 0.22 to 0.49 using ssGBLUP. The most accurate and consistent predictions were obtained using ssGBLUP for all analyzed traits. The ssGBLUP seems to be more suitable to obtain genomic predictions for feed efficiency traits on an experimental population of genotyped animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27898889     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2016-0401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  15 in total

1.  The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1.

Authors:  Bruna P Sollero; Jeremy T Howard; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Prediction ability for growth and maternal traits using SNP arrays based on different marker densities in Nellore cattle using the ssGBLUP.

Authors:  Juan Diego Rodriguez Neira; Elisa Peripolli; Maria Paula Marinho de Negreiros; Rafael Espigolan; Rodrigo López-Correa; Ignacio Aguilar; Raysildo B Lobo; Fernando Baldi
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Prune homolog 2 with BCH domain (PRUNE2) gene expression is associated with feed efficiency-related traits in Nelore steers.

Authors:  Andressa Oliveira Lima; Jessica Moraes Malheiros; Juliana Afonso; Juliana Petrini; Luiz Lehmann Coutinho; Wellison Jarles da Silva Diniz; Flávia Aline Bressani; Polyana Cristine Tizioto; Priscila Silva Neubern de Oliveira; Janssen Ayna Silva Ribeiro; Karina Santos de Oliveira; Marina Ibelli Pereira Rocha; Bruno Gabriel Nascimento Andrade; Heidge Fukumasu; Hamid Beiki; James Mark Reecy; Adhemar Zerlotini; Gerson Barreto Mourao; Luciana Correia de Almeida Regitano
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 3.224

4.  Eating Time as a Genetic Indicator of Methane Emissions and Feed Efficiency in Australian Maternal Composite Sheep.

Authors:  Boris J Sepulveda; Stephanie K Muir; Sunduimijid Bolormaa; Matthew I Knight; Ralph Behrendt; Iona M MacLeod; Jennie E Pryce; Hans D Daetwyler
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Genomic evaluation of feed efficiency component traits in Duroc pigs using 80K, 650K and whole-genome sequence variants.

Authors:  Chunyan Zhang; Robert Alan Kemp; Paul Stothard; Zhiquan Wang; Nicholas Boddicker; Kirill Krivushin; Jack Dekkers; Graham Plastow
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Genome-wide scan reveals population stratification and footprints of recent selection in Nelore cattle.

Authors:  Diercles F Cardoso; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque; Christian Reimer; Saber Qanbari; Malena Erbe; André V do Nascimento; Guilherme C Venturini; Daiane C Becker Scalez; Fernando Baldi; Gregório M Ferreira de Camargo; Maria E Zerlotti Mercadante; Joslaine N do Santos Gonçalves Cyrillo; Henner Simianer; Humberto Tonhati
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Genomic predictions combining SNP markers and copy number variations in Nellore cattle.

Authors:  El Hamidi A Hay; Yuri T Utsunomiya; Lingyang Xu; Yang Zhou; Haroldo H R Neves; Roberto Carvalheiro; Derek M Bickhart; Li Ma; Jose Fernando Garcia; George E Liu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Opportunities for genomic selection in American mink: A simulation study.

Authors:  Karim Karimi; Mehdi Sargolzaei; Graham Stuart Plastow; Zhiquan Wang; Younes Miar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genomic Prediction of Average Daily Gain, Back-Fat Thickness, and Loin Muscle Depth Using Different Genomic Tools in Canadian Swine Populations.

Authors:  Siavash Salek Ardestani; Mohsen Jafarikia; Mehdi Sargolzaei; Brian Sullivan; Younes Miar
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Genomic prediction with parallel computing for slaughter traits in Chinese Simmental beef cattle using high-density genotypes.

Authors:  Peng Guo; Bo Zhu; Lingyang Xu; Hong Niu; Zezhao Wang; Long Guan; Yonghu Liang; Hemin Ni; Yong Guo; Yan Chen; Lupei Zhang; Xue Gao; Huijiang Gao; Junya Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.