Literature DB >> 24784987

Understanding the complexity of ambivalence toward pregnancy: does it predict inconsistent use of contraception?

Sam Hyun Yoo1, Karen Benjamin Guzzo, Sarah R Hayford.   

Abstract

Ambivalence towards future pregnancy is common and may increase the risk of unprotected sex and unintended pregnancy. We propose that ambivalent attitudes toward pregnancy consist of subtypes that are differentially associated with contraceptive use. Using data from a nationally representative survey of unmarried young adults (N = 1,147), we constructed four categories of ambivalence based on attitudes toward a hypothetical pregnancy. Multivariate analyses examined characteristics of ambivalence and the association between ambivalence and contraceptive use. Approximately one third of sexually active unmarried young adults are ambivalent about pregnancy. Having positive ambivalence (important to avoid a pregnancy but would be happy if it occurred) is associated with age, gender, education, and Hispanic origin. Although ambivalence toward pregnancy is associated with lower contraceptive use, this is true only among women with negative ambivalence (not important to avoid a pregnancy but would be unhappy if a pregnancy occurred). Attitudes toward pregnancy are multifaceted, and a more nuanced understanding of women's attitudes toward pregnancy can help target prevention programs and related policies for women at risk of unintended pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24784987     DOI: 10.1080/19485565.2014.905193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biodemography Soc Biol        ISSN: 1948-5565


  23 in total

1.  Socioeconomic Variation in the Effect of Economic Conditions on Marriage and Nonmarital Fertility in the United States: Evidence From the Great Recession.

Authors:  Daniel Schneider; Orestes P Hastings
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2015-12

2.  Do perceptions of their partners' childbearing desires affect young women's pregnancy risk? Further study of ambivalence.

Authors:  Warren B Miller; Jennifer S Barber; Paul Schulz
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2016-11-29

3.  Insights in Public Health: Improving Reproductive Life Planning in Hawai'i: One Key Question®.

Authors:  Sarah Hipp; Alyssa Carlson; Elizabeth McFarlane; Tetine L Sentell; Donald Hayes
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2017-09

4.  Change and consistency in US women's pregnancy attitudes and associations with contraceptive use.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Perceived Costs and Benefits of Early Childbearing: New Dimensions and Predictive Power.

Authors:  Sarah R Hayford; Karen Benjamin Guzzo; Yasamin Kusunoki; Jennifer S Barber
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2016-05-13

6.  Pregnancy preferences and contraceptive use among US women.

Authors:  Goleen Samari; Diana G Foster; Lauren J Ralph; Corinne H Rocca
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Are Uncertain Fertility Intentions a Temporary or Long-term Outlook? Findings from a Panel Study.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2016-11-09

8.  Comparison of a Timing-Based Measure of Unintended Pregnancy and the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy.

Authors:  Abigail R A Aiken; Carolyn L Westhoff; James Trussell; Paula M Castaño
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2016-08-30

9.  Conceptualizing Childbearing Ambivalence: A Social and Dynamic Perspective.

Authors:  Christie Sennott; Sara Yeatman
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2018-05-09

10.  Using Longitudinal Data to Understand Changes in Consistent Contraceptive Use.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Athena Tapales; Laura D Lindberg; Jennifer Frost
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2015-08-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.