G Filippatos1, P Andriopoulos1, G Panoutsopoulos1, S Zyga1, K Souliotis2, V Gennimata3, M Tsironi1. 1. Department of Nursing, Faculty of Human Movement and Quality of Life Sciences, University of Peloponnese,Sparta, Greece. 2. Department of Social and Education Policy, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Peloponnese, Corinth, Greece. 3. Microbiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Death certification represents an excellent source for mortality statistics and appropriate public health surveillance. Errors in reporting the cause of death impede the development of national health policies and, accordingly, allocation of resources. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of errors in the cause of death and to identify factors that may be associated with inaccuracies in death certificates. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of all natural death certifications in a defined Greek region was conducted over the period 2006-2010. Specific criteria for major and minor errors were adopted for the evaluation of death certificates. RESULTS: A total of 5,828 death certificates due to natural causes were identified. Major errors were found in 64.6 % of them with almost every death certificate having a minor error. Major error rate did not differ per year (p =0.65). Most commonly encountered major errors were a non-acceptable cause of death (31.2 %) and an incorrect sequencing (16.8 %). Factors affecting their frequency were the age of the deceased (older than 80 years, p =0.025), the area of certificate completion (rural and semi-urban, p <0.001) and doctor's grade (consultant, p <0.026). CONCLUSIONS: High rate of recording errors at death certification influences the accuracy of the cause of death in a defined region in Southern Greece. Due to their impact on mortality statistics and health policies, standard practices of death certification should be established. Coordinated educational interventions are expected to play a significant role on this. Hippokratia 2016, 20(1): 19-25.
BACKGROUND:Death certification represents an excellent source for mortality statistics and appropriate public health surveillance. Errors in reporting the cause of death impede the development of national health policies and, accordingly, allocation of resources. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of errors in the cause of death and to identify factors that may be associated with inaccuracies in death certificates. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of all natural death certifications in a defined Greek region was conducted over the period 2006-2010. Specific criteria for major and minor errors were adopted for the evaluation of death certificates. RESULTS: A total of 5,828 death certificates due to natural causes were identified. Major errors were found in 64.6 % of them with almost every death certificate having a minor error. Major error rate did not differ per year (p =0.65). Most commonly encountered major errors were a non-acceptable cause of death (31.2 %) and an incorrect sequencing (16.8 %). Factors affecting their frequency were the age of the deceased (older than 80 years, p =0.025), the area of certificate completion (rural and semi-urban, p <0.001) and doctor's grade (consultant, p <0.026). CONCLUSIONS: High rate of recording errors at death certification influences the accuracy of the cause of death in a defined region in Southern Greece. Due to their impact on mortality statistics and health policies, standard practices of death certification should be established. Coordinated educational interventions are expected to play a significant role on this. Hippokratia 2016, 20(1): 19-25.
Entities:
Keywords:
Death certificate; errors; health policy; mortality; public health
Authors: Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy; Manohar S Gowda; Caroline W Murray; Krishnamohan R Basarakodu; James L Vacek Journal: Am J Med Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Reena Agarwal; Jennifer M Norton; Kevin Konty; Regina Zimmerman; Maleeka Glover; Akaki Lekiachvili; Henraya McGruder; Ann Malarcher; Michele Casper; George A Mensah; Lorna Thorpe Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Claudia Allemani; Tomohiro Matsuda; Veronica Di Carlo; Rhea Harewood; Melissa Matz; Maja Nikšić; Audrey Bonaventure; Mikhail Valkov; Christopher J Johnson; Jacques Estève; Olufemi J Ogunbiyi; Gulnar Azevedo E Silva; Wan-Qing Chen; Sultan Eser; Gerda Engholm; Charles A Stiller; Alain Monnereau; Ryan R Woods; Otto Visser; Gek Hsiang Lim; Joanne Aitken; Hannah K Weir; Michel P Coleman Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Janet Miki; Rasika Rampatige; Nicola Richards; Tim Adair; Juan Cortez-Escalante; Javier Vargas-Herrera Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: U S H Gamage; Tim Adair; Lene Mikkelsen; Pasyodun Koralage Buddhika Mahesh; John Hart; Hafiz Chowdhury; Hang Li; Rohina Joshi; W M C K Senevirathna; H D N L Fernando; Deirdre McLaughlin; Alan D Lopez Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-11-08 Impact factor: 3.240