| Literature DB >> 27895259 |
Rebecca Smith1, Iñigo J Vitórica-Yrezábal1, Adrian Hill2, Lee Brammer3.
Abstract
A metal-organic framework (Entities:
Keywords: coordination chemistry; in situ powder diffraction; metal–organic framework; porous materials; solid-state NMR; solid-state transformation
Year: 2017 PMID: 27895259 PMCID: PMC5179934 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci ISSN: 1364-503X Impact factor: 4.226
Scheme 1.Structural analogy between (a) hydrogen-bonded carboxylic acid dimer (R = alkyl, aryl group) and (b) silver carboxylate dimer (Rf = perfluoroalkyl group).
Scheme 2.Examples of silver(I) perfluorocarboxylate dimer secondary building units, connected by neutral (ditopic) diimine ligands, L, to propagate coordination polymers.
Figure 1.Observed (blue) and calculated (red) profiles and difference plot [(Iobs − Icalcd)] (grey) at 298 K of the Pawley refinement for 1-MeOH (1.0 ≤ 2θ ≤ 19.0°, dmin = 1.22 Å); Rwp = 0.162; Rwp′ = 0.200.
Data collection, structure solution and refinement parameters for crystal structures of 1-MeOH, 1 and 2.
| crystal colour | colourless | colourless | colourless |
| crystal size (mm) | 0.6 × 0.3 × 0.3 | 0.70 × 0.07 × 0.07 | 0.35 × 0.20 × 0.02 |
| crystal system | rhombohedral | rhombohedral | monoclinic |
| space group, | |||
| 50.0474 (6) | 25.1849 (4) | 10.5304 (10) | |
| 50.0474 (6) | 25.1849 (4) | 5.6409 (5) | |
| 32.7348 (4) | 33.2733 (7) | 12.1404 (10) | |
| 90 | 90 | 90.863 (6) | |
| 71 007.5 (18) | 18 277.0 (7) | 721.07 (11) | |
| density (Mg m−3) | 1.972 | 1.766 | 2.487 |
| wavelength (Å) | 0.71073 | 0.71073 | 0.71073 |
| temperature (K) | 150 | 298 | 100 |
| 2.051 | 1.978 | 2.785 | |
| 2 | 3.52–50.70 | 4.467–50.70 | 5.08–55.17 |
| reflns collected | 115 207 | 98 053 | 11 467 |
| independent reflns ( | 28 859 (0.0585) | 3728 (0.0477) | 1665 (0.0396) |
| reflns used in refinement, | 28 859 | 3728 | 1665 |
| L.S. parameters, | 1862 | 223 | 111 |
| restraints, | 747 | 14 | 0 |
| 0.0564 | 0.0276 | 0.0215 | |
| w | 0.1142 | 0.0757 | 0.0512 |
| 1.128 | 1.070 | 1.067 |
a; b; c.
Figure 2.Observed (blue) and calculated (red) profiles and difference plot [(Iobs − Icalcd)] (grey) at 298 K (1.0 ≤ 2θ ≤ 19.0°, dmin = 1.22 Å) of (a) the joint Pawley refinement for 1-MeOH and 1 and Rietveld refinement [37] for Ag2CO3 (Rwp = 0.081; Rwp′ = 0.125); (b) the Pawley refinement of the intermediate phase (see below) and Rietveld refinement for 1, 2 and Ag2CO3 (Rwp = 0.181; Rwp′ = 0.308); (c) Rietveld refinement of 2 and Ag2CO3 (Rwp = 0.194; Rwp′ = 0.270).
Figure 3.Crystal structure of 1-MeOH viewed down the c-axis showing the two types of hexagonal channels containing MeOH molecules (A channels, MeOH in green; B channels, MeOH in red). Silver atoms are in black, carbon in grey, hydrogen in cyan, nitrogen in blue, fluorine in yellow.
Figure 4.(a) A section of the column of Ag(I) centres that lies along the intersection of channel walls (along the c-axis) in 1-MeOH showing the trigonal (and occasional pseudotetrahedral) coordination of Ag(I) centres. (b) Section showing two walls of a channel emphasizing the alternating arrangement of ligands. (c) Same section as shown in (b), but in space-filling representation to illustrate the rugose channel wall surfaces. Long Ag–O bonds 2.54 < Ag–O < 2.68 Å are shown as thin lines. Ag atoms are in black, tetrafluorosuccinate ligands in red, TMP ligands in blue.
Figure 5.Crystal structure of 1 viewed down the c-axis showing one ring that defines the channels and its dimensions. Colours as in figure 3.
Figure 6.Crystal structure of 2 viewed (a) down the b-axis and (b) along the (101) direction showing Ag(O2CCF2CF2CO2) layers pillared by TMP ligands. Methyl groups have been removed for clarity in (b). Colours as in figure 4.
Guest contents determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy and GC.
| guest/TMP ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| guest | 1H NMR (methyl) | 1H NMR (aryl) | 13C CP-MAS NMR | GC | TGA |
| toluene | 0.68 | 0.65 | guest observed | 1.60 | 0.40 |
| 0.44 | 0.42 | a | 1.97 | 0.46 | |
| 0.16 | 0.15 | a | 0.85 | 0.46 | |
| 0.22 | 0.21 | guest observed | 0.38 | 0.24 | |
| tetramethylbenzene | 0.16 | 0.12 | guest observed | a | a |
| tetrafluorobenzene | 0.24 | n.a. | guest observed | 0.32 | a |
| pentane | a | a | a | 0.00 | a |
| cyclohexane | 0 | 0 | a | 0.01 | a |
| perfluoro(methylcyclohexane) | 0 | 0 | a | 0.00 | a |
aNo measurement made.
Figure 7.Sequence of powder patterns showing the reaction progression from 1-MeOH to 2 via 1 and an intermediate. Note: a small amount (few %) of residual Ag2CO3 starting material is present throughout the sequence of patterns. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 8.13C CP-MAS NMR spectrum of 2, showing signals for TMP ligands. Signals for tetrafluorosuccinate ligands are not observed due to absence of nearby hydrogen nuclei. Asterisks indicate spinning sidebands. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 9.13 C CP-MAS NMR spectra showing signals for (a) TMP aryl carbons and (b) TMP methyl carbons in 1-guest after exchange with different aromatic guests: ortho-xylene (red), toluene (blue) and tetrafluorobenzene (green). Insets show spectra of 2 for comparison.