| Literature DB >> 27894277 |
Peter Turton1, Richard Hay2, Jonathon Taylor3, Jamie McPhee4, Ingeborg Welters5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients frequently suffer muscle weakness whilst in critical care. Ultrasound can reliably track loss of muscle size, but also quantifies the arrangement of the muscle fascicles, known as the muscle architecture. We sought to measure both pennation angle and fascicle length, as well as tracking changes in muscle thickness in a population of critically ill patients.Entities:
Keywords: Critical care; Muscle architecture; Muscle wasting; Pennation angle; Ultrasound; Weakness
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27894277 PMCID: PMC5127036 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-016-0269-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Anesthesiol ISSN: 1471-2253 Impact factor: 2.217
Fig. 1Representative images of elbow flexor compartment (a), gastrocnemius (b) and vastus lateralis (c).
Changes in measured variables in the elbow flexor compartment, gastrocnemius and vastus lateralis muscles
| Day 1 ( | Day 5 ( | Day 10 ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MT – Elbow flexor compartment, [cm] | 3.20 ± 0.58 | 3.30 ± 0.87 | 2.98 ± 0.83 | 0.62 |
| MT – Gastrocnemius, [cm] | 1.29 ± 0.60 | 1.34 ± 0.43 | 1.14 ± 0.65 | 0.72 |
| MT – Vastus lateralis [cm] (median ± IQR) | 1.53 ± 0.77 | 1.40 ± 0.46 | 1.18 ± 0.36 | 0.002* |
| FL – Gastrocnemius [cm] | 3.99 ± 1.84 | 3.69 ± 1.37 | 3.43 ± 2.12 | 0.90 |
| FL – Vastus lateralis [cm] | 8.1 ± 3.06 | 8.45 ± 4.55 | 7.85 ± 5.89 | 0.89 |
| PA – Gastrocnemius [degrees] (median ± IQR) | 20.93 ± 6.41 | 19.82 ± 5.65 | 17.5 ± 3.91 | 0.37 |
| PA – Vastus lateralis [degrees] (median ± IQR) | 11.09 ± 4.88 | 9.86 ± 3.69 | 8.03 ± 3.86 | 0.018* |
MT Muscle thickness, FL Fascicle length, PA Pennation angle
Significance tested with Friedman’s test, followed by pairwise Friedman’s tests where p < 0.05. Stastically significant p-values have been marked with *. Muscle thickness and pennation angle of the vastus lateralis muscle significantly decreased over both 5 and 10 days
Fig. 2Study recruitment flow diagram
Patient characteristics
| Day 1 | Day 5 | Day 10 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample Size | 22 | 16 | 9 | --- |
| Males, n (%) | 19 (86.3)* | 13 (81.3) | 7 (77.7) | * < 0.001 |
| Age, [years] (Mean ± SD) | 59.77 ± 16.74 | 63.12 ± 16.44 | 58.66 ± 19.95 | 0.78 |
| Height, [metres] (Mean ± SD) | 1.72 ± 0.13 | 1.68 ± 0.13 | 1.71 ± 0.13 | 0.78 |
| Weight, [kg] (Mean ± SD) | 88.50 ± 29.19 | 82.95 ± 27.31 | 75.66 ± 24.58 | 0.54 |
| Body Mass Index, (Mean ± SD) | 30.75 ± 12.50 | 30.99 ± 13.69 | 25.73 ± 7.40 | 0.61 |
Data tested with one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction applied. Statistically significant p-values (p<0.05) have been marked with *. Despite patients withdrawing throughout the study period, there were no significant changes to group’s demographic variables. The number of males compared to females on day 1 was compared using the binomial test
Patient characteristics by presenting diagnosis
| Catergory of diagnosis | Number of patients, N, (%) |
|---|---|
| Sepsis | 11 (50 %) |
| Post surgery | 4 (18 %) |
| Post cardiac arrest | 4 (18 %) |
| Overdose | 3 (9 %) |
All patients met the criteria for Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)
Comparison of muscle thickness between all three muscles on day 1
| Muscle 1 | Muscle 2 | Correlation coefficient, r |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Elbow flexor compartment | Vastus lateralis | 0.50 | 0.01* |
| Elbow flexor compartment | Medial head of gastrocnemius | 0.54 | 0.006* |
| Vastus lateralis | Medial head of gastrocnemius | 0.60 | 0.002* |
Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficient, *p < 0.05
Fig. 4Changes to muscle thickness and pennation angle in vastus lateralis muscle during critical care admission. Top panel: Change in muscle thickness. Error bars are 95 % confidence intervals. Bottom panel: Change in pennation angle. Error bars are 95 % confidence intervals
Fig. 3Pennation angle of gastrocnemius on day 1 and change in pennation angle on day 10 Correlation tested using Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficient. A significant negative relationship was observed between pennation angle on admission and the change in pennation angle size on day 10
Fig. 5Pennation angle of vastus lateralis on day 1 and change in angle on day 5. Correlation tested using Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficient. A significant correlation was noted between the pennation angle on admission, and the percentage change in pennation angle on day 5
Fig. 6Changes in muscle thickness and pennation angle on day 5 in the vastus lateralis muscle. Correlation tested using Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficient. On day 5, a significant relationship was observed between the change in muscle thickness and the change in pennation angle