| Literature DB >> 27894251 |
Kaihei Oki1, Mutsumi Toyama2, Taihei Banno2, Osamu Chonan3, Yoshimi Benno2, Koichi Watanabe3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Japan, a variety of traditional dietary habits and daily routines have developed in many regions. The effects of these behaviors, and the regional differences in the composition of the gut microbiota, are yet to be sufficiently studied. To characterize the Japanese gut microbiota and identify the factors shaping its composition, we conducted 16S metagenomics analysis of fecal samples collected from healthy Japanese adults residing in various regions of Japan. Each participant also completed a 94-question lifestyle questionnaire.Entities:
Keywords: 16S metagenomics; Body mass index (BMI); Bowel movement frequency; Dietary habits and daily routine; Healthy Japanese adult; Human gut microbiota
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27894251 PMCID: PMC5127096 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-016-0898-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Subject characteristics stratified by area of residence
| Subject characteristics | Whole | Hokkaido | Tohoku | Kanto | Chubu | Kansai | Chugoku Shikoku | Kyushu |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject No. | 516 | 38 | 40 | 193 | 49 | 49 | 48 | 99 |
| Age | 52.4 ± 13.4 | 50.0 ± 13.8 | 49.7 ± 17.1 | 53.5 ± 12.3 | 53.7 ± 14.2 | 54.8 ± 16.1 | 53.3 ± 10.0 | 50.0 ± 13.1 |
| Gender ratio (Female : Male) | 325 : 191 | 14 : 24a | 26 : 14ab | 122 : 71ab | 31 : 18ab | 19 : 30a | 36 : 12b | 77 : 22b |
Significance was calculated among area of residences
In each row, scores with the same letter in their superscripts or without superscripts were not significantly different (P ≥ 0.05) from each other
Fig. 1Heatmap of the abundances of the 66 bacterial families identified in the fecal microbiota. The data for each subject were aligned to a dendrogram constructed by using the UPGMA algorithm based on the Jensen-Shannon divergence. The color scale at the bottom of the heatmap shows the abundance of each bacterial family (log10 %) and the horizontal scale bar showed Jensen-Shannon divergence (0.5). Subjects’ area of residence and gender are indicated by using color codes on the bottom of this figure
Fig. 2Biplots constructed based on the bacterial family composition of each subjects’ fecal microbiota. A principal component analysis of the bacterial family composition of each subjects’ fecal microbiota was performed, and a biplot in the PC1–PC2 dimension were constructed. The relative contributions of PC1 and PC2 were 54.1 and 25.7%, respectively. a The constructed biplot with an overlay showing the effects of the five most abundant bacterial families on plot location in the PC1–PC2 dimension (1. Prevotellaceae, 2. Bacteroidaceae, 3. Lachnospiraceae, 4. Ruminococcaceae, 5. Bifidobacteriaceae). b The biplot shown in (a) with the sample plots colored based on area of residence. c The biplot shown in (a) with the sample plots colored based on gender
Abundance of the major PCA determinants stratified by area of residence
| Bacterial family | Abundance (Mean% ± SD) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whole | Hokkaido | Tohoku | Kanto | Chubu | Kansai | Chugoku Shikoku | Kyushu | |
|
| 33.1 ± 19.0 | 32.4 ± 19.8 | 32.4 ± 19.7 | 30.8 ± 18.0 | 39.2 ± 20.1 | 34.7 ± 17.4 | 30.8 ± 17.7 | 35.4 ± 20.5 |
|
| 17.6 ± 10.1 | 20.3 ± 7.7a | 18.4 ± 9.7ab | 18.7 ± 10.5ab | 15.3 ± 10.4ab | 17.8 ± 9.7ab | 18.1 ± 10.0ab | 15.1 ± 10.0b |
|
| 9.1 ± 18.0 | 7.1 ± 16.8 | 10.0 ± 19.1 | 10.8 ± 19.3 | 5.9 ± 16.6 | 4.9 ± 11.1 | 10.4 ± 20.4 | 8.9 ± 17.1 |
|
| 15.8 ± 9.3 | 15.0 ± 10.3 | 16.5 ± 9.9 | 16.4 ± 8.9 | 15.3 ± 10.1 | 15.1 ± 9.9 | 15.0 ± 9.0 | 15.9 ± 8.8 |
Significance was calculated among area of residences
In each row, scores with the same letter in their superscripts or without superscripts were not significantly different (P ≥ 0.05) from each other
Prevalence of the major PCA determinants stratified by area of residence
| Bacterial family | Prevalence (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whole | Hokkaido | Tohoku | Kanto | Chubu | Kansai | Chugoku Shikoku | Kyushu | |
|
| 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
|
| 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
|
| 73.3 | 76.3 | 67.5 | 74.1 | 69.4 | 65.3 | 77.1 | 76.8 |
|
| 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Significance was calculated among area of residences
In each row, scores without superscripts were not significantly different (P ≥ 0.05) from each other
Abundance and prevalence of the major PCA determinants stratified by gender
| Bacterial family | Abundance (Mean% ± SD) | Prevalence (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | Male | Significance | Female | Male | Significance | |
|
| 33.2 ± 18.5 | 32.9 ± 19.7 | NS | 100 | 100 | NS |
|
| 18.0 ± 10.4 | 17.0 ± 9.5 | NS | 100 | 100 | NS |
|
| 9.7 ± 17.7 | 16.6 ± 22.6 | ** | 71.1 | 77.0 | NS |
|
| 17.9 ± 8.7 | 12.4 ± 9.2 | ** | 100 | 100 | NS |
NS: P ≥ 0.05, **: P < 0.01
Statistical output for the cluster analysis
| Statistics | Whole | Female | Male | Hokkaido | Tohoku | Kanto | Chubu | Kansai | Chugoku Shikoku | Kyushu |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cluster no. showing max CH score | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Max CH score | 328 | 183 | 208 | 21 | 30 | 186 | 32 | 33 | 44 | 60 |
| Prediction strength | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.96 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.56 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.63 |
| Silhouette index | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.36 | 0.20 |
Fig. 3Cluster analysis based on the bacterial family compositions of the microbiota. Clusters were identified by conducting a PCoA with the PAM algorithm for the whole cohort (a) and for the female (b) and the male (c) subjects based on the bacterial family composition of the microbiota. The relative contributions of PC1 versus PC2 for (a), (b), and (c) were 35.4% versus 18.4%, 32.6% versus 18.8%, and 40.1% versus 17.2%, respectively. In (c), the different colors indicate that the clusters were statistically reliable
Question scores that were significantly different between the two clusters identified in the male subjects
| Question | Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q 29 | Mushroom intake frequency | 2.6 ± 0.8 | 2.1 ± 0.6 | ** |
| Q 52 | I was bothered by things that usually do not bother me within the past week | 1.2 ± 0.5 | 1.5 ± 0.7 | * |
| Q 81 | A close relationship was negatively affected by a physical or mental health problem within the past month | 1.3 ± 0.6 | 1.5 ± 0.9 | * |
| Q 83 | I felt nervous within the past month | 1.8 ± 0.9 | 2.1 ± 1.0 | * |
| Q 94 | I feel like I am becoming quite healthy | 3.8 ± 0.9 | 3.5 ± 0.9 | * |
NS: P ≥ 0.05, *: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01
Question scores that were significantly correlated with bacterial family abundance
| Question | Bacterial family |
| τ | Abundance (Mean% ± SD) | Prevalence (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q 7 | Bowel movement frequency |
| <0.001 | −0.24 | 0.39 ± 1.54 | 56.8 |
| Q 7 | Bowel movement frequency |
| <0.001 | −0.28 | 0.18 ± 0.27 | 82.4 |
| Q 7 | Bowel movement frequency |
| <0.001 | −0.25 | 1.51 ± 1.82 | 90.9 |
| Q 13 | Dairy product intake frequency |
| <0.001 | 0.25 | 0.19 ± 1.35 | 52.5 |
| Q 21 |
|
| <0.001 | 0.34 | 0.03 ± 0.36 | 26.6 |
Combinations showing significant correlation (P < 0.001 and |τ| > 0.2) were listed
Fig. 4Correlations between Christensenellaceae, Mogibacteriaceae, Rikenellaceae, and 14 other bacterial families. Correlations between the abundance of Christensenellaceae, Mogibacteriaceae, Rikenellaceae, and 14 other bacterial families are shown as a heatmap (a) and network (b). a Kendall’s Tau-b ratio is shown for combinations with P < 0.001 and |τ| > 0.2. The strength of the shading within each cell indicates the strength of the positive (blue) or negative (red) correlation for a given bacterial family combination. NS, P ≥ 0.001; NC, |τ| ≤ 0.2. b Nodes for two correlated families (P < 0.001 and |τ| > 0.2) are shown connected by a line. The color, strength, and thickness of the lines indicate the strength of the positive (blue) or negative (red) correlation between the families. Bac, Bacteroidaceae; Bar, Barnesiellaceae; Cer, Cerasicoccaceae; Chr, Christensenellaceae; Deh, Dehalobacteriaceae; Des, Desulfovibrionaceae; Fus, Fusobacteriaceae; Mog, Mogibacteriaceae; Odo, Odoribacteraceae; Oxa, Oxalobacteraceae; Pep, Peptococcaceae; Rik, Rikenellaceae; Rum, Ruminococcaceae; Syn, Synergistaceae; Vei, Veillonellaceae; Ver, Verrucomicrobiaceae; Vic, Victivallaceae
Correlations between question score and operational taxonomic unit abundance
| Question | OTU ID | Bacterial family |
| τ | Abundance (Mean% ± SD) | Prevalence (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q 7 | Bowel movement frequency | 844 |
| <0.001 | −0.21 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 14.3 |
| Q 7 | Bowel movement frequency | 2858 |
| <0.001 | −0.22 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 11.6 |
| Q 7 | Bowel movement frequency | 417 |
| <0.001 | −0.23 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 18.0 |
| Q 13 | Dairy product intake frequency | 318 |
| <0.001 | 0.36 | 0.09 ± 0.08 | 24.8 |
| Q 21 |
| 547 |
| <0.001 | 0.36 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 25.2 |
Combinations showing significant correlation (P < 0.001 and |τ| > 0.2) were listed
Bowel movement frequency and correlated bacterial families in lean and obese subjects
| Questionnaire score (Mean ± SD) or abundance (Mean% ± SD) | Prevalence (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lean group (BMI < 25) | Obese group (BMI > 30) | Significance | Lean group (BMI < 25) | Obese group (BMI > 30) | Significance | |
| Bowel movement frequency | 3.53 ± 0.77 | 3.54 ± 0.78 | NS | - | - | - |
|
| 0.77 ± 2.14 | 0.01 ± 0.004 | ** | 59.3 | 23.1 | * |
|
| 0.23 ± 0.29 | 0.06 ± 0.05 | ** | 84.7 | 69.2 | NS |
|
| 1.77 ± 1.86 | 0.90 ± 0.96 | * | 91.5 | 84.6 | NS |
NS: P ≥ 0.05, *: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01