Literature DB >> 27893894

Face exploration dynamics differentiate men and women.

Antoine Coutrot1, Nicola Binetti2, Charlotte Harrison2, Isabelle Mareschal3, Alan Johnston4.   

Abstract

The human face is central to our everyday social interactions. Recent studies have shown that while gazing at faces, each one of us has a particular eye-scanning pattern, highly stable across time. Although variables such as culture or personality have been shown to modulate gaze behavior, we still don't know what shapes these idiosyncrasies. Moreover, most previous observations rely on static analyses of small-sized eye-position data sets averaged across time. Here, we probe the temporal dynamics of gaze to explore what information can be extracted about the observers and what is being observed. Controlling for any stimuli effect, we demonstrate that among many individual characteristics, the gender of both the participant (gazer) and the person being observed (actor) are the factors that most influence gaze patterns during face exploration. We record and exploit the largest set of eye-tracking data (405 participants, 58 nationalities) from participants watching videos of another person. Using novel data-mining techniques, we show that female gazers follow a much more exploratory scanning strategy than males. Moreover, female gazers watching female actresses look more at the eye on the left side. These results have strong implications in every field using gaze-based models from computer vision to clinical psychology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27893894     DOI: 10.1167/16.14.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  15 in total

1.  Physician Gender Differences in Processing Surgical Risk Features in Videos of Standardized Patients.

Authors:  Mark K Ferguson; Kristen Wroblewski; Megan Huisingh-Scheetz; Katherine Thompson; Jeanne Farnan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Psychobiological Responses Reveal Audiovisual Noise Differentially Challenges Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Bonnie Brown; Kelsey Mankel; Caitlin Nelms Price
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline.

Authors:  Kenneth Holmqvist; Saga Lee Örbom; Ignace T C Hooge; Diederick C Niehorster; Robert G Alexander; Richard Andersson; Jeroen S Benjamins; Pieter Blignaut; Anne-Marie Brouwer; Lewis L Chuang; Kirsten A Dalrymple; Denis Drieghe; Matt J Dunn; Ulrich Ettinger; Susann Fiedler; Tom Foulsham; Jos N van der Geest; Dan Witzner Hansen; Samuel B Hutton; Enkelejda Kasneci; Alan Kingstone; Paul C Knox; Ellen M Kok; Helena Lee; Joy Yeonjoo Lee; Jukka M Leppänen; Stephen Macknik; Päivi Majaranta; Susana Martinez-Conde; Antje Nuthmann; Marcus Nyström; Jacob L Orquin; Jorge Otero-Millan; Soon Young Park; Stanislav Popelka; Frank Proudlock; Frank Renkewitz; Austin Roorda; Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck; Bonita Sharif; Frederick Shic; Mark Shovman; Mervyn G Thomas; Ward Venrooij; Raimondas Zemblys; Roy S Hessels
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-06

4.  Scanpath modeling and classification with hidden Markov models.

Authors:  Antoine Coutrot; Janet H Hsiao; Antoni B Chan
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-02

5.  Using dual eye tracking to uncover personal gaze patterns during social interaction.

Authors:  Shane L Rogers; Craig P Speelman; Oliver Guidetti; Melissa Longmuir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Assumptions about the positioning of virtual stimuli affect gaze direction estimates during Augmented Reality based interactions.

Authors:  Nicola Binetti; Tianchang Cheng; Isabelle Mareschal; Duncan Brumby; Simon Julier; Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Fixation-pattern similarity analysis reveals adaptive changes in face-viewing strategies following aversive learning.

Authors:  Lea Kampermann; Niklas Wilming; Arjen Alink; Christian Büchel; Selim Onat
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Combined frequency-tagging EEG and eye-tracking measures provide no support for the "excess mouth/diminished eye attention" hypothesis in autism.

Authors:  Sofie Vettori; Stephanie Van der Donck; Jannes Nys; Pieter Moors; Tim Van Wesemael; Jean Steyaert; Bruno Rossion; Milena Dzhelyova; Bart Boets
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 7.509

9.  Gender Classification Based on Eye Movements: A Processing Effect During Passive Face Viewing.

Authors:  Negar Sammaknejad; Hamidreza Pouretemad; Changiz Eslahchi; Alireza Salahirad; Ashkan Alinejad
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-09-30

10.  Gender-based pairings influence cooperative expectations and behaviours.

Authors:  Anna Cigarini; Julián Vicens; Josep Perelló
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.