Literature DB >> 27893446

Stability of radiomic features in CT perfusion maps.

M Bogowicz1, O Riesterer, R A Bundschuh, P Veit-Haibach, M Hüllner, G Studer, S Stieb, S Glatz, M Pruschy, M Guckenberger, S Tanadini-Lang.   

Abstract

This study aimed to identify a set of stable radiomic parameters in CT perfusion (CTP) maps with respect to CTP calculation factors and image discretization, as an input for future prognostic models for local tumor response to chemo-radiotherapy. Pre-treatment CTP images of eleven patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma and eleven patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were analyzed. 315 radiomic parameters were studied per perfusion map (blood volume, blood flow and mean transit time). Radiomics robustness was investigated regarding the potentially standardizable (image discretization method, Hounsfield unit (HU) threshold, voxel size and temporal resolution) and non-standardizable (artery contouring and noise threshold) perfusion calculation factors using the intraclass correlation (ICC). To gain added value for our model radiomic parameters correlated with tumor volume, a well-known predictive factor for local tumor response to chemo-radiotherapy, were excluded from the analysis. The remaining stable radiomic parameters were grouped according to inter-parameter Spearman correlations and for each group the parameter with the highest ICC was included in the final set. The acceptance level was 0.9 and 0.7 for the ICC and correlation, respectively. The image discretization method using fixed number of bins or fixed intervals gave a similar number of stable radiomic parameters (around 40%). The potentially standardizable factors introduced more variability into radiomic parameters than the non-standardizable ones with 56-98% and 43-58% instability rates, respectively. The highest variability was observed for voxel size (instability rate  >97% for both patient cohorts). Without standardization of CTP calculation factors none of the studied radiomic parameters were stable. After standardization with respect to non-standardizable factors ten radiomic parameters were stable for both patient cohorts after correction for inter-parameter correlations. Voxel size, image discretization, HU threshold and temporal resolution have to be standardized to build a reliable predictive model based on CTP radiomics analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27893446     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/61/24/8736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  12 in total

1.  Neural network training for cross-protocol radiomic feature standardization in computed tomography.

Authors:  Vincent Andrearczyk; Adrien Depeursinge; Henning Müller
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-06-06

Review 2.  Translational Radiomics: Defining the Strategy Pipeline and Considerations for Application-Part 2: From Clinical Implementation to Enterprise.

Authors:  Faiq Shaikh; Benjamin Franc; Erastus Allen; Evis Sala; Omer Awan; Kenneth Hendrata; Safwan Halabi; Sohaib Mohiuddin; Sana Malik; Dexter Hadley; Rasu Shrestha
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Benchmarking Various Radiomic Toolkit Features While Applying the Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative toward Clinical Translation of Radiomic Analysis.

Authors:  Mingxi Lei; Bino Varghese; Darryl Hwang; Steven Cen; Xiaomeng Lei; Bhushan Desai; Afshin Azadikhah; Assad Oberai; Vinay Duddalwar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 4.903

4.  Impact of Interfractional Error on Dosiomic Features.

Authors:  Chanon Puttanawarut; Nat Sirirutbunkajorn; Narisara Tawong; Suphalak Khachonkham; Poompis Pattaranutaporn; Yodchanan Wongsawat
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Investigating rectal toxicity associated dosimetric features with deformable accumulated rectal surface dose maps for cervical cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jiawei Chen; Haibin Chen; Zichun Zhong; Zhuoyu Wang; Brian Hrycushko; Linghong Zhou; Steve Jiang; Kevin Albuquerque; Xuejun Gu; Xin Zhen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Harmonizing the pixel size in retrospective computed tomography radiomics studies.

Authors:  Dennis Mackin; Xenia Fave; Lifei Zhang; Jinzhong Yang; A Kyle Jones; Chaan S Ng; Laurence Court
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Radiomics for Response and Outcome Assessment for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Liting Shi; Yaoyao He; Zilong Yuan; Stanley Benedict; Richard Valicenti; Jianfeng Qiu; Yi Rong
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-01

8.  Prediction of 1p/19q Codeletion in Diffuse Glioma Patients Using Pre-operative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Donnie Kim; Nicholas Wang; Viswesh Ravikumar; D R Raghuram; Jinju Li; Ankit Patel; Richard E Wendt; Ganesh Rao; Arvind Rao
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 9.  Reproducibility and Generalizability in Radiomics Modeling: Possible Strategies in Radiologic and Statistical Perspectives.

Authors:  Ji Eun Park; Seo Young Park; Hwa Jung Kim; Ho Sung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Applicability of radiomics in interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis: proof of concept.

Authors:  K Martini; B Baessler; M Bogowicz; C Blüthgen; M Mannil; S Tanadini-Lang; J Schniering; B Maurer; T Frauenfelder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.