Kenneth M Langa1, Eric B Larson2, Eileen M Crimmins3, Jessica D Faul4, Deborah A Levine5, Mohammed U Kabeto6, David R Weir4. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor2Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan3Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor4Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 2. Group Health Research Institute, Departments of Medicine and Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle. 3. Andrus Gerontology Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. 4. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor2Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan4Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor7Department of Neurology and Stroke Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 6. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor2Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
Importance: The aging of the US population is expected to lead to a large increase in the number of adults with dementia, but some recent studies in the United States and other high-income countries suggest that the age-specific risk of dementia may have declined over the past 25 years. Clarifying current and future population trends in dementia prevalence and risk has important implications for patients, families, and government programs. Objective: To compare the prevalence of dementia in the United States in 2000 and 2012. Design, Setting, and Participants: We used data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative, population-based longitudinal survey of individuals in the United States 65 years or older from the 2000 (n = 10 546) and 2012 (n = 10 511) waves of the HRS. Main Outcomes and Measures: Dementia was identified in each year using HRS cognitive measures and validated methods for classifying self-respondents, as well as those represented by a proxy. Logistic regression was used to identify socioeconomic and health variables associated with change in dementia prevalence between 2000 and 2012. Results: The study cohorts had an average age of 75.0 years (95% CI, 74.8-75.2 years) in 2000 and 74.8 years (95% CI, 74.5-75.1 years) in 2012 (P = .24); 58.4% (95% CI, 57.3%-59.4%) of the 2000 cohort was female compared with 56.3% (95% CI, 55.5%-57.0%) of the 2012 cohort (P < .001). Dementia prevalence among those 65 years or older decreased from 11.6% (95% CI, 10.7%-12.7%) in 2000 to 8.8% (95% CI, 8.2%-9.4%) (8.6% with age- and sex-standardization) in 2012 (P < .001). More years of education was associated with a lower risk for dementia, and average years of education increased significantly (from 11.8 years [95% CI, 11.6-11.9 years] to 12.7 years [95% CI, 12.6-12.9 years]; P < .001) between 2000 and 2012. The decline in dementia prevalence occurred even though there was a significant age- and sex-adjusted increase between years in the cardiovascular risk profile (eg, prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and obesity) among older US adults. Conclusions and Relevance: The prevalence of dementia in the United States declined significantly between 2000 and 2012. An increase in educational attainment was associated with some of the decline in dementia prevalence, but the full set of social, behavioral, and medical factors contributing to the decline is still uncertain. Continued monitoring of trends in dementia incidence and prevalence will be important for better gauging the full future societal impact of dementia as the number of older adults increases in the decades ahead.
Importance: The aging of the US population is expected to lead to a large increase in the number of adults with dementia, but some recent studies in the United States and other high-income countries suggest that the age-specific risk of dementia may have declined over the past 25 years. Clarifying current and future population trends in dementia prevalence and risk has important implications for patients, families, and government programs. Objective: To compare the prevalence of dementia in the United States in 2000 and 2012. Design, Setting, and Participants: We used data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative, population-based longitudinal survey of individuals in the United States 65 years or older from the 2000 (n = 10 546) and 2012 (n = 10 511) waves of the HRS. Main Outcomes and Measures: Dementia was identified in each year using HRS cognitive measures and validated methods for classifying self-respondents, as well as those represented by a proxy. Logistic regression was used to identify socioeconomic and health variables associated with change in dementia prevalence between 2000 and 2012. Results: The study cohorts had an average age of 75.0 years (95% CI, 74.8-75.2 years) in 2000 and 74.8 years (95% CI, 74.5-75.1 years) in 2012 (P = .24); 58.4% (95% CI, 57.3%-59.4%) of the 2000 cohort was female compared with 56.3% (95% CI, 55.5%-57.0%) of the 2012 cohort (P < .001). Dementia prevalence among those 65 years or older decreased from 11.6% (95% CI, 10.7%-12.7%) in 2000 to 8.8% (95% CI, 8.2%-9.4%) (8.6% with age- and sex-standardization) in 2012 (P < .001). More years of education was associated with a lower risk for dementia, and average years of education increased significantly (from 11.8 years [95% CI, 11.6-11.9 years] to 12.7 years [95% CI, 12.6-12.9 years]; P < .001) between 2000 and 2012. The decline in dementia prevalence occurred even though there was a significant age- and sex-adjusted increase between years in the cardiovascular risk profile (eg, prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and obesity) among older US adults. Conclusions and Relevance: The prevalence of dementia in the United States declined significantly between 2000 and 2012. An increase in educational attainment was associated with some of the decline in dementia prevalence, but the full set of social, behavioral, and medical factors contributing to the decline is still uncertain. Continued monitoring of trends in dementia incidence and prevalence will be important for better gauging the full future societal impact of dementia as the number of older adults increases in the decades ahead.
Authors: Kenneth M Langa; Eric B Larson; Jason H Karlawish; David M Cutler; Mohammed U Kabeto; Scott Y Kim; Allison B Rosen Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Amanda Sonnega; Jessica D Faul; Mary Beth Ofstedal; Kenneth M Langa; John W R Phillips; David R Weir Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: E M C Schrijvers; B F J Verhaaren; P J Koudstaal; A Hofman; M A Ikram; M M B Breteler Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Annette L Fitzpatrick; Lewis H Kuller; Oscar L Lopez; Paula Diehr; Ellen S O'Meara; W T Longstreth; José A Luchsinger Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2009-03
Authors: Michael D Hurd; Paco Martorell; Adeline Delavande; Kathleen J Mullen; Kenneth M Langa Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-04-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Cornelius A Rietveld; Tõnu Esko; Gail Davies; Tune H Pers; Patrick Turley; Beben Benyamin; Christopher F Chabris; Valur Emilsson; Andrew D Johnson; James J Lee; Christiaan de Leeuw; Riccardo E Marioni; Sarah E Medland; Michael B Miller; Olga Rostapshova; Sven J van der Lee; Anna A E Vinkhuyzen; Najaf Amin; Dalton Conley; Jaime Derringer; Cornelia M van Duijn; Rudolf Fehrmann; Lude Franke; Edward L Glaeser; Narelle K Hansell; Caroline Hayward; William G Iacono; Carla Ibrahim-Verbaas; Vincent Jaddoe; Juha Karjalainen; David Laibson; Paul Lichtenstein; David C Liewald; Patrik K E Magnusson; Nicholas G Martin; Matt McGue; George McMahon; Nancy L Pedersen; Steven Pinker; David J Porteous; Danielle Posthuma; Fernando Rivadeneira; Blair H Smith; John M Starr; Henning Tiemeier; Nicholas J Timpson; Maciej Trzaskowski; André G Uitterlinden; Frank C Verhulst; Mary E Ward; Margaret J Wright; George Davey Smith; Ian J Deary; Magnus Johannesson; Robert Plomin; Peter M Visscher; Daniel J Benjamin; David Cesarini; Philipp D Koellinger Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-09-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Carla R Schubert; Mary E Fischer; A Alex Pinto; Yanjun Chen; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Michael Y Tsai; Ted S Tweed; Karen J Cruickshanks Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Annie Robitaille; Ardo van den Hout; Robson J M Machado; David A Bennett; Iva Čukić; Ian J Deary; Scott M Hofer; Emiel O Hoogendijk; Martijn Huisman; Boo Johansson; Andriy V Koval; Maaike van der Noordt; Andrea M Piccinin; Judith J M Rijnhart; Archana Singh-Manoux; Johan Skoog; Ingmar Skoog; John Starr; Lisa Vermunt; Sean Clouston; Graciela Muniz Terrera Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Pei-Jung Lin; Joanna Emerson; Jessica D Faul; Joshua T Cohen; Peter J Neumann; Howard M Fillit; Allan T Daly; Nikoletta Margaretos; Karen M Freund Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Rebecca A Nebel; Neelum T Aggarwal; Lisa L Barnes; Aimee Gallagher; Jill M Goldstein; Kejal Kantarci; Monica P Mallampalli; Elizabeth C Mormino; Laura Scott; Wai Haung Yu; Pauline M Maki; Michelle M Mielke Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 21.566