Literature DB >> 27891603

Using Harm-Based Weights for the AHRQ Patient Safety for Selected Indicators Composite (PSI-90): Does It Affect Assessment of Hospital Performance and Financial Penalties in Veterans Health Administration Hospitals?

Qi Chen1, Amy K Rosen1,2, Ann Borzecki3,4,5, Michael Shwartz1,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether hospital profiles for public reporting and pay-for-performance, measured by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety for Selected Indicators (PSI-90) composite measure, were affected by using the recently developed harm-based weights. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Retrospective analysis of 2012-2014 data from the Veterans Health Administration (VA). STUDY
DESIGN: The AHRQ PSI software (v5.0) was applied to obtain the original volume-based PSI-90 scores for 132 acute-care hospitals. We constructed a modified PSI-90 using the harm-based weights developed by AHRQ. We compared hospital profiles for public reporting and pay-for-performance between these two PSI-90s and assessed patterns in these changes. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: The volume-based and the harm-based PSI-90s were strongly correlated (r = 0.67, p < .0001). The use of the harm-based PSI-90 had a relatively small impact on public reporting (i.e., 5 percent hospitals changed categorization), but it had a much larger impact on pay-for-performance (e.g., 15 percent of hospitals would have faced different financial penalties under the Medicare Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program). Because of changes in weights of specific PSIs, hospital profile changes occurred systematically.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of the harm-based weights in PSI-90 has the potential to significantly change payments under pay-for-performance programs. Policy makers should carefully develop transition plans for guiding hospitals through changes in any quality metrics used for pay-for-performance. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient safety; composite measures; hospital profiling; performance assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27891603      PMCID: PMC5134190          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  7 in total

1.  Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals.

Authors:  W S Robinson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Robinson's Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals: methodological corrections.

Authors:  Manfred Te Grotenhuis; Rob Eisinga; S V Subramanian
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Examining the validity of AHRQ's patient safety indicators (PSIs): is variation in PSI composite score related to hospital organizational factors?

Authors:  Marlena H Shin; Jennifer L Sullivan; Amy K Rosen; Jeffrey L Solomon; Edward J Dunn; Stephanie L Shimada; Jennifer Hayes; Peter E Rivard
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Examining the impact of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) on the Veterans Health Administration: the case of readmissions.

Authors:  Amy K Rosen; Susan Loveland; Marlena Shin; Michael Shwartz; Amresh Hanchate; Qi Chen; Haytham M A Kaafarani; Ann Borzecki
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Testing the association between patient safety indicators and hospital structural characteristics in VA and nonfederal hospitals.

Authors:  Peter E Rivard; Anne Elixhauser; Cindy L Christiansen; Amy K Rosen
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.929

6.  Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality patient safety indicators and mortality in surgical patients.

Authors:  Rajesh Ramanathan; Patricia Leavell; Luke G Wolfe; Therese M Duane
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Do patient safety indicators explain increased weekend mortality?

Authors:  Rocco Ricciardi; Jason Nelson; Todd D Francone; Patricia L Roberts; Thomas E Read; Jason F Hall; David J Schoetz; Peter W Marcello
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.192

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Best of the 2016 AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting.

Authors:  Jacqueline S Zinn; Patrick S Romano
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Patient Safety Indicators are an insufficient performance metric to track and grade outcomes of open aortic repair.

Authors:  Rebecca Sorber; Katherine A Giuliano; Caitlin W Hicks; James H Black
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Concordance of Hospital Ranks and Category Ratings Using the Current Technical Specification of US Hospital Star Ratings and Reasonable Alternative Specifications.

Authors:  Matthew E Barclay; Mary Dixon-Woods; Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2022-05-13

4.  Measurement matters: changing penalty calculations under the hospital acquired condition reduction program (HACRP) cost hospitals millions.

Authors:  Olga A Vsevolozhskaya; Karina C Manz; Pierre M Zephyr; Teresa M Waters
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  The problem with composite indicators.

Authors:  Matthew Barclay; Mary Dixon-Woods; Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-08-12       Impact factor: 7.035

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.