Literature DB >> 25380608

Examining the validity of AHRQ's patient safety indicators (PSIs): is variation in PSI composite score related to hospital organizational factors?

Marlena H Shin1, Jennifer L Sullivan2, Amy K Rosen3, Jeffrey L Solomon4, Edward J Dunn5, Stephanie L Shimada6, Jennifer Hayes7, Peter E Rivard8.   

Abstract

Increasing use of Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) for hospital performance measurement intensifies the need to critically assess their validity. Our study examined the extent to which variation in PSI composite score is related to differences in hospital organizational structures or processes (i.e., criterion validity). In site visits to three Veterans Health Administration hospitals with high and three with low PSI composite scores ("low performers" and "high performers," respectively), we interviewed a cross-section of hospital staff. We then coded interview transcripts for evidence in 13 safety-related domains and assessed variation across high and low performers. Evidence of leadership and coordination of work/communication (organizational process domains) was predominantly favorable for high performers only. Evidence in the other domains was either mixed, or there were insufficient data to rate the domains. While we found some evidence of criterion validity, the extent to which variation in PSI rates is related to differences in hospitals' organizational structures/processes needs further study.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient Safety Indicators; criterion validity; hospital; organizational factors; qualitative methods

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25380608     DOI: 10.1177/1077558714556894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  3 in total

1.  Using Harm-Based Weights for the AHRQ Patient Safety for Selected Indicators Composite (PSI-90): Does It Affect Assessment of Hospital Performance and Financial Penalties in Veterans Health Administration Hospitals?

Authors:  Qi Chen; Amy K Rosen; Ann Borzecki; Michael Shwartz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  User-centered design to improve clinical decision support in primary care.

Authors:  Julian Brunner; Emmeline Chuang; Caroline Goldzweig; Cindy L Cain; Catherine Sugar; Elizabeth M Yano
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Characteristics of healthcare organisations struggling to improve quality: results from a systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Valerie M Vaughn; Sanjay Saint; Sarah L Krein; Jane H Forman; Jennifer Meddings; Jessica Ameling; Suzanne Winter; Whitney Townsend; Vineet Chopra
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 7.035

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.