Literature DB >> 27891448

Can Feulgen Stain be a Reliable Biomarker over PAP Stain for Estimation of Micronuclei Score?

Manish Kumar1, Umesh Chandra Prasad2, Betina Chandolia3, S M Manjunath4, Shiva Basu5, Silvie Verma6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Malignant transformation of the Potentially Malignant Lesions (PML) in the oral cavity is associated with elevated mortality rate because of its aggressive and exceedingly invasive nature. Meticulous diagnosis and prompt therapy of PML may help prevent malignant conversion in oral lesions. Carcinogenic insult to oral cells results in chromosomal damage and formation of Micronuclei (Mn), before the development of clinical symptoms. AIM: To determine the genotoxic effect of smoking and chewing tobacco on target tissue using Mn assay and to evaluate the prevalence of other nuclear anomalies associated with it and to determine the reliability of feulgen stain for Mn assay over Papaincolau (PAP) stain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PAP and feulgen staining was done to study Mn in individuals who were having tobacco habits (smoking and chewing) without lesion (n=30), individuals who were having tobacco habit (smoking and chewing) with PML (n=30) and apparently healthy subjects (n=30). Data was analysed for statistical significance using SPSS 17.0 by Kruskal - Wallis Test and Bonferronii test.
RESULTS: Tobacco habits in the form of smoking and chewing have mutagenic effects on human chromosomes which is indicated by increased frequency of Mn in oral exfoliative cells. The mean Mn frequency using feulgen stain was found to be 12.27 with lesion, 10.23 with without lesion and 3.87 in controls. Whereas, metanucleated analysis revealed no significant correlation with the formation of Mn. Non-specific DNA stain (PAP) showed high numbers of Mn cells in all the groups compared to feulgen. Statistically significant difference (p<0.0001) was observed when both the stains were compared for Mn numbers.
CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the individuals having tobacco habits (smoking and chewing) with lesion have high number of Mn cells, thus supporting the assay to be used as a reliable biomarker to assess the genotoxic effect of tobacco in the oral mucosa. The reason for almost twice as high Mn in PAP stained smears is suggestive of cell injury which is collimated by formation of keratin bodies, resulting in its misinterpretation as Mn, leading to false positive results. Hence, it was concluded that PAP stain can be used to identify abnormal cytological changes resulting from mutagenic agent but not to interpret Mn.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytological stains; Nuclear anomalies; Potentially malignant lesion; Tobacco habit

Year:  2016        PMID: 27891448      PMCID: PMC5121786          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18859.8630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  35 in total

1.  Micronuclei and other nuclear anomalies in buccal smears: methods development.

Authors:  P E Tolbert; C M Shy; J W Allen
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Micronucleus investigation of alcoholic patients with oral carcinomas.

Authors:  Andréa Ramirez; Pedro Henrique Saldanha
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2002-09-30

Review 3.  Current concepts in oral cancer.

Authors:  P B Sugerman; N W Savage
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.291

4.  Comparison of the Papanicolaou and Feulgen staining methods for DNA quantification by image analysis.

Authors:  A M Gurley; D F Hidvegi; J W Bacus; S S Bacus
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1990

5.  Effect of staining procedures on the results of micronucleus assays with exfoliated oral mucosa cells.

Authors:  Armen Nersesyan; Michael Kundi; Kambis Atefie; Rolf Schulte-Hermann; Siegfried Knasmüller
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Cytogenetic biomonitoring of Spanish greenhouse workers exposed to pesticides: micronuclei analysis in peripheral blood lymphocytes and buccal epithelial cells.

Authors:  L Lucero; S Pastor; S Suárez; R Durbán; C Gómez; T Parrón; A Creus; R Marcos
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2000-01-24       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 7.  A genetic explanation of Slaughter's concept of field cancerization: evidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  Boudewijn J M Braakhuis; Maarten P Tabor; J Alain Kummer; C René Leemans; Ruud H Brakenhoff
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Tobacco use and oral disease.

Authors:  D M Winn
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  Localized formation of micronuclei in the oral mucosa and tobacco-specific nitrosamines in the saliva of "reverse" smokers, Khaini-tobacco chewers and gudakhu users.

Authors:  H F Stich; B B Parida; K D Brunnemann
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1992-01-21       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Cytomorphometric analysis of the gingival epithelium in type 2 diabetic patients with and without smoking habit.

Authors:  Punit Vaibhav Patel; Sheela Kumar Gujjari
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.000

View more
  1 in total

1.  Genotoxic Effect of Various forms of Tobacco on Oral Buccal Mucosa and Nuclear Changes as a biomarker.

Authors:  Sowmiya Devadoss; Murali Chinnakonda Raveendranath; T Shanmugam Kathiresan; Kesavan Ganesan
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.