Literature DB >> 27891441

Development and Testing of a Reliable and Valid Patient-Needs Questionnaire for Breast Cancer Inpatients in China.

Ling Li1, Jing Xue2, Zhan-Zhan Li2, Li-Zhang Chen3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer patients are demanding more active roles in their care, especially in the initial diagnosis and treatment stages. At present, there is no suitable patient questionnaire that appropriately incorporates Chinese language, habits, and cultural differences. AIM: To develop and validate a patient-needs questionnaire for female breast cancer inpatients in China.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The questionnaire structure was based on Maslow's model and a modern medical model. In the first step, a focus group was used to design 125 questions, of which 64 constituted the initial questionnaire for item screening with a group of 115 hospitalized patients with breast cancer. Items were included or excluded based on the evaluation of eight statistical analysis. Ultimately, 38 items were selected and validated. The reliability and validity of the 38-item questionnaire were determined in a cohort of 323 patients.
RESULTS: The scale was set up with the 38 selected items. The four primary areas were disease knowledge, medical environment, psychosocial parameters and sexual attitudes. Cronbach's coefficient was 0.959. The split-half reliability value was 0.935. Principal component factor analysis extracted four common factors.
CONCLUSION: Our new questionnaire, designed to assess the care needs of Chinese inpatients with breast cancer is reliable, sensitive, effective, independent and representative. It can be used in medical practice as a tool for a more complete assessment of patients' needs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bio-psychosocial model; Chinese questionnaire; Demand; Health education; Instrument; Reliability; Validity

Year:  2016        PMID: 27891441      PMCID: PMC5121779          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17907.8668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  21 in total

1.  Factor analysis and scale revision.

Authors:  S P Reise; N G Waller; A L Comrey
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2000-09

Review 2.  Improving patient care through the prism of psychology: application of Maslow's hierarchy to sedation, delirium, and early mobility in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  James C Jackson; Michael J Santoro; Taylor M Ely; Leanne Boehm; Amy L Kiehl; Lindsay S Anderson; E Wesley Ely
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.425

3.  Informational needs of women with a recent diagnosis of breast cancer: development and initial testing of a tool.

Authors:  S Galloway; J Graydon; D Harrison; B Evans-Boyden; S Palmer-Wickham; S Burlein-Hall; L Rich-van der Bij; P West; A Blair
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 4.  Appraising the self-assessed support needs of Turkish women with breast cancer.

Authors:  B Erci; N Karabulut
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.520

5.  Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis.

Authors:  D L Streiner
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.356

6.  The Needs Assessment for Advanced Cancer Patients (NA-ACP): a measure of the perceived needs of patients with advanced, incurable cancer. a study of validity, reliability and acceptability.

Authors:  K J Rainbird; J J Perkins; R W Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Validation of the cancer needs questionnaire (CNQ) short-form version in an ambulatory cancer setting.

Authors:  T Cossich; P Schofield; S A McLachlan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Women with newly diagnosed breast cancer and their perceptions of needs in a health-care context.

Authors:  Bjørg Th Landmark; Ann Bøhler; Kari Loberg; Astrid K Wahl
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 9.  A review of psychosocial needs of breast-cancer patients and their relatives.

Authors:  Silvia Schmid-Büchi; Ruud J G Halfens; Theo Dassen; Bart van den Borne
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.036

10.  The Brazilian Version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) Is a Feasible, Valid and Reliable Instrument for the Measurement of Symptoms in Advanced Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Paiva; Luciana Lopes Manfredini; Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro Paiva; David Hui; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.