Literature DB >> 11021152

Factor analysis and scale revision.

S P Reise1, N G Waller, A L Comrey.   

Abstract

This article reviews methodological issues that arise in the application of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to scale revision and refinement. The authors begin by discussing how the appropriate use of EFA in scale revision is influenced by both the hierarchical nature of psychological constructs and the motivations underlying the revision. Then they specifically address (a) important issues that arise prior to data collection (e.g., selecting an appropriate sample), (b) technical aspects of factor analysis (e.g., determining the number of factors to retain), and (c) procedures used to evaluate the outcome of the scale revision (e.g., determining whether the new measure functions equivalently for different populations).

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11021152     DOI: 10.1037//1040-3590.12.3.287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  83 in total

1.  The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures.

Authors:  Steven P Reise; Julien Morizot; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Measuring coping in pregnant minority women.

Authors:  Roberta Jeanne Ruiz; Susan Gennaro; Caitlin O'Connor; C Nathan Marti; Amanda Lulloff; Tayra Keshinover; Anne Gibeau; Bernadette Melnyk
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  The Perceived Invalidation of Emotion Scale (PIES): Development and psychometric properties of a novel measure of current emotion invalidation.

Authors:  Melissa J Zielinski; Jennifer C Veilleux
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2018-05-24

4.  Cross-cultural equivalence of HSCL-25 and WHO (ten) Wellbeing index: findings from a population-based survey of immigrants and non-immigrants in Sweden.

Authors:  Petter Tinghög; John Carstensen
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2009-07-28

5.  Deriving utility scores from the SF-36 health instrument using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Graeme Hawthorne; Konstancja Densley; Julie F Pallant; Duncan Mortimer; Leonie Segal
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Factor structure of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI): findings from a large incarcerated sample.

Authors:  Craig S Neumann; Melanie B Malterer; Joseph P Newman
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2008-06

7.  Validation of interpersonal support evaluation list-12 (ISEL-12) scores among English- and Spanish-speaking Hispanics/Latinos from the HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study.

Authors:  Erin L Merz; Scott C Roesch; Vanessa L Malcarne; Frank J Penedo; Maria M Llabre; Orit B Weitzman; Elena L Navas-Nacher; Krista M Perreira; Franklyn Gonzalez; Liliana A Ponguta; Timothy P Johnson; Linda C Gallo
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2013-12-09

8.  Gender differences in the relation between the late positive potential in response to anxiety sensitivity images and self-reported anxiety sensitivity.

Authors:  Nicholas P Allan; Matt R Judah; Brian J Albanese; Richard J Macatee; Carson A Sutton; Matthew D Bachman; Edward M Bernat; Norman B Schmidt
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2018-03-19

9.  Having a fit: impact of number of items and distribution of data on traditional criteria for assessing IRT's unidimensionality assumption.

Authors:  Karon F Cook; Michael A Kallen; Dagmar Amtmann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study-Neurocognitive Questionnaire (CCSS-NCQ) revised: item response analysis and concurrent validity.

Authors:  Kelly M Kenzik; I-Chan Huang; Tara M Brinkman; Brandon Baughman; Kirsten K Ness; Elizabeth A Shenkman; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison; Kevin R Krull
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.