| Literature DB >> 27891245 |
Joo-Hee Seo1, Kyung-Do Park2, Hak-Kyo Lee2, Hong-Sik Kong1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently about 26,000 horses are breeding in Korea and 57.2% (14,776 horses) of them are breeding in Jeju island. According to the statistics published in 2010, the horses breeding in Jeju island are subdivided into Jeju horse (6.1%), Thoroughbred (18.8%) and Halla horse (75.1%). Halla horses are defined as a crossbreed between Jeju and Thoroughbred horses and are used for horse racing, horse riding and horse meat production. However, little research has been conducted on Halla horses because of the perception of crossbreed and people's weighted interest toward Jeju horses.Entities:
Keywords: Allele frequency; Halla Horse; Microsatellite marker; Polymorphism
Year: 2016 PMID: 27891245 PMCID: PMC5114825 DOI: 10.1186/s40781-016-0120-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Technol ISSN: 2055-0391
No. of Allele, Heterozygosity (observed and expected) and PIC value of microsatellite markers in Halla horses
| Marker | No of allele | Hobs | Hexp | PIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHT4 | 11 | 0.843 | 0.835 | 0.814 |
| AHT5 | 10 | 0.810 | 0.808 | 0.781 |
| ASB2 | 13 | 0.857 | 0.843 | 0.824 |
| ASB17 | 17 | 0.790 | 0.770 | 0.746 |
| ASB23 | 13 | 0.802 | 0.814 | 0.789 |
| CA425 | 11 | 0.623 | 0.623 | 0.598 |
| HMS1 | 11 | 0.612 | 0.607 | 0.548 |
| HMS2 | 11 | 0.760 | 0.748 | 0.717 |
| HMS3 | 8 | 0.746 | 0.789 | 0.760 |
| HMS6 | 7 | 0.743 | 0.736 | 0.697 |
| HMS7 | 8 | 0.748 | 0.765 | 0.728 |
| HTG4 | 7 | 0.625 | 0.619 | 0.569 |
| HTG6 | 11 | 0.728 | 0.711 | 0.659 |
| HTG7 | 6 | 0.750 | 0.749 | 0.706 |
| HTG10 | 13 | 0.843 | 0.843 | 0.825 |
| LEX3 | 11 | 0.641 | 0.859 | 0.843 |
| VHL20 | 9 | 0.815 | 0.803 | 0.778 |
| Mean | 10.41 | 0.749 | 0.760 | 0.728 |
The expected probability values among genotypes of random individual (PI) for discrimination horse lines using markers
| No. of Marker | Random | Half-sib | Sib |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.20 × 10−2 | 8.09 × 10−2 | 3.09 × 10−1 |
| 2 | 1.22 × 10−3 | 7.33 × 10−2 | 9.77 × 10−2 |
| 3 | 4.76 × 10−5 | 6.70 × 10−2 | 3.11 × 10−2 |
| 4 | 2.04 × 10−6 | 6.52 × 10−5 | 1.00 × 10−2 |
| 5 | 1.08 × 10−7 | 7.29 × 10−6 | 3.37 × 10−3 |
| 6 | 6.10 × 10−9 | 8.50 × 10−7 | 1.14 × 10−3 |
| 7 | 3.49 × 10−10 | 1.01 × 10−7 | 3.89 × 10−4 |
| 8 | 2.30 × 10−11 | 1.31 × 10−8 | 1.36 × 10−4 |
| 9 | 1.58 × 10−12 | 1.83 × 10−9 | 4.87 × 10−5 |
| 10 | 1.30 × 10−13 | 2.73 × 10−10 | 1.78 × 10−5 |
| 11 | 1.23 × 10−14 | 4.44 × 10−11 | 6.66 × 10−6 |
| 12 | 1.03 × 10−15 | 7.00 × 10−12 | 2.49 × 10−6 |
| 13 | 9.90 × 10−17 | 1.18 × 10−12 | 9.47 × 10−7 |
| 14 | 1.20× 10−17 | 2.29 × 10−13 | 3.78 × 10−7 |
| 15 | 1.79 × 10−18 | 5.66 × 10−14 | 1.69 × 10−7 |
| 16 | 3.10 × 10−19 | 1.48 × 10−14 | 7.66 × 10−8 |
| 17 | 5.90 × 10−20 | 4.08 × 10−15 | 3.56 × 10−8 |
Fig. 1Alleles and allele’s frequencies for the Microsatllite AHT4 in the studied breeds
Fig. 2Alleles and allele’s frequencies for the Microsatllite AHT5 in the studied breeds
Fig. 3Alleles and allele’s frequencies for the Microsatllite HMS2 in the studied breeds