Literature DB >> 27890534

Effects of arterial wall models and measurement uncertainties on cardiovascular model predictions.

V G Eck1, J Sturdy2, L R Hellevik1.   

Abstract

We developed a methodology to assess and compare the prediction quality of cardiovascular models for patient-specific simulations calibrated with uncertainty-hampered measurements. The methodology was applied in a one-dimensional blood flow model to estimate the impact of measurement uncertainty in wall model parameters on the predictions of pressure and flow in an arterial network. We assessed the prediction quality of three wall models that have been widely used in one-dimensional blood flow simulations. A 37-artery network, previously used in one experimental and several simulation studies, was adapted to patient-specific conditions with a set of three clinically measurable inputs: carotid-femoral wave speed, mean arterial pressure and area in the brachial artery. We quantified the uncertainty of the predicted pressure and flow waves in eight locations in the network and assessed the sensitivity of the model prediction with respect to the measurements of wave speed, pressure and cross-sectional area. Furthermore, we developed novel time-averaged sensitivity indices to assess the contribution of model parameters to the uncertainty of time-varying quantities (e.g., pressure and flow). The results from our patient-specific network model demonstrated that our novel indices allowed for a more accurate sensitivity analysis of time-varying quantities compared to conventional Sobol sensitivity indices.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arterial wall models; Blood flow; Sensitivity analysis; Uncertainty quantification; Wave propagation model

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27890534     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  4 in total

1.  Uncertainty quantification of simulated biomechanical stimuli in coronary artery bypass grafts.

Authors:  Justin S Tran; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 6.756

2.  Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of left ventricular function during the full cardiac cycle.

Authors:  J O Campos; J Sundnes; R W Dos Santos; B M Rocha
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Machine Learning for Cardiovascular Biomechanics Modeling: Challenges and Beyond.

Authors:  Amirhossein Arzani; Jian-Xun Wang; Michael S Sacks; Shawn C Shadden
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Multilevel and multifidelity uncertainty quantification for cardiovascular hemodynamics.

Authors:  Casey M Fleeter; Gianluca Geraci; Daniele E Schiavazzi; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 6.756

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.