Literature DB >> 27888090

Rationale and design of Mi-CARE: The mile square colorectal cancer screening, awareness and referral and education project.

Joanna Buscemi1, Yazmin San Miguel2, Lisa Tussing-Humphreys2, Elizabeth A Watts2, Marian L Fitzgibbon2, Karriem Watson3, Robert A Winn2, Kameron L Matthews2, Yamile Molina2.   

Abstract

Although colorectal cancer (CRC) is largely preventable through identification of pre-cancerous polyps through various screening modalities, morbidity and mortality rates remain a challenge, especially in African-American, Latino, low-income and uninsured/underinsured patients. Barriers to screening include cost, access to health care facilities, lack of recommendation to screen, and psychosocial factors such as embarrassment, fear of the test, anxiety about testing preparation and fear of a cancer diagnosis. Various intervention approaches to improve CRC screening rates have been developed. However, comparative effectiveness research (CER) to investigate the relative performance of different approaches has been understudied, especially across different real-life practice settings. Assessment of differential efficacy across diverse vulnerable populations is also lacking. The current paper describes the rationale and design for the Mile Square Colorectal Cancer Screening, Awareness and Referral and Education Project (Mi-CARE), which aims to increase CRC screening rates in 3 clinics of a large Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) by reducing prominent barriers to screening for low-income, minority and underserved patients. Patients attending these clinics will receive one of three interventions to increase screening uptake: lay patient navigator (LPN)-based navigation, provider level navigation, or mailed birthday CRC screening reminders. The design of our program allows for comparison of the effectiveness of the tailored interventions across sites and patient populations. Data from Mi-CARE may help to inform the dissemination of tailored interventions across FQHCs to reduce health disparities in CRC.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Federally qualified health center; Health disparities; Screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27888090      PMCID: PMC5525148          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  34 in total

1.  Society of Behavioral Medicine (SBM) position statement: SBM supports the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable's (NCCRT) call to action to reach 80 % colorectal cancer screening rates by 2018.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Becker; Joanna Buscemi; Marian L Fitzgibbon; Karriem Watson; Kameron L Matthews; Robert A Winn
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Evaluation of an intervention to increase screening colonoscopy in an urban public hospital setting.

Authors:  Denis Nash; Sulaiman Azeez; David Vlahov; Melissa Schori
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Factors explaining racial/ethnic disparities in rates of physician recommendation for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Nasar U Ahmed; Valerie Pelletier; Kelly Winter; Ahmed N Albatineh
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Carol Desantis; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 5.  Patient navigation: an update on the state of the science.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; J Phil Harrop; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Colorectal cancer screening among ethnically diverse, low-income patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; Jennifer Murillo; Sandra Lisboa; A Naomie Casimir; Lisa Valley-Shah; Karen M Emmons; Robert H Fletcher; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-23

Review 7.  Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science?

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Tracy A Battaglia; Donald J Dudley; Roland Garcia; Amanda Greene; Elizabeth Calhoun; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Electra D Paskett; Peter C Raich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Improving fecal occult blood testing compliance using a mailed educational reminder.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Lee; Veronica Reis; Shanglei Liu; Lorraine Conn; Erik J Groessl; Theodore G Ganiats; Samuel B Ho
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Urban-rural disparities in colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of 1998-2005 data from the Centers for Disease Control's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.

Authors:  Allison M Cole; J Elizabeth Jackson; Mark Doescher
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  A multilevel intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among community health center patients: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; Jennifer Murillo; Elizabeth Medlin; Sandra Lisboa; Lisa Valley-Shah; Robert H Fletcher; Karen M Emmons; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.497

View more
  2 in total

1.  'Simple and easy:' providers' and latinos' perceptions of the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Claudia X Aguado Loi; Dinorah Martinez Tyson; Enmanuel A Chavarria; Liliana Gutierrez; Lynne Klasko; Stacy Davis; Diana Lopez; Tracy Johns; Cathy D Meade; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 2.  Contemporary use of real-world data for clinical trial conduct in the United States: a scoping review.

Authors:  James R Rogers; Junghwan Lee; Ziheng Zhou; Ying Kuen Cheung; George Hripcsak; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.497

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.