Literature DB >> 27887876

An accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the augmented maxilla using osteosynthesis screws.

L M Verhamme1, G J Meijer2, A Soehardi3, S J Bergé3, T Xi3, T J J Maal3.   

Abstract

Previous research on the accuracy of flapless implant placement of virtually planned implants in the augmented maxilla revealed unfavourable discrepancies between implant planning and placement. By using the osteosynthesis screws placed during the augmentation procedure, the surgical template could be optimally stabilized. The purpose of this study was to validate this method by evaluating its clinically relevant accuracy. Twelve consecutive fully edentulous patients with extreme resorption of the maxilla were treated with a bone augmentation procedure. Virtual implant planning was performed and a surgical template was manufactured. Subsequently, six implants were installed using the surgical template, which was only supported by the osteosynthesis screws. Implant deviations between planning and placement were calculated. A total of 72 implants were installed. Mean deviations found in the mesiodistal direction were 0.817mm at the implant tip and 0.528mm at the implant shoulder. The angular deviation was 2.924°. In the buccolingual direction, a deviation of 1.038mm was registered at the implant tip and 0.633mm at the implant shoulder. The angular deviation was 3.440°. This study showed that implant placement in the augmented maxilla using a surgical template supported by osteosynthesis screws is accurate.
Copyright © 2016 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD/CAM technology; accuracy; atrophic maxilla; computer-assisted; cone beam computed tomography; edentulous maxilla; flapless implant surgery; implant planning; osteosynthesis screws; sinus floor elevation; surgical guides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27887876     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  4 in total

Review 1.  Advantages and limitations of implant surgery with CAD/CAM surgical guides: A literature review.

Authors:  Gokce-Soganci Unsal; Ilser Turkyilmaz; Samantha Lakhia
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-04-01

2.  Multivariate analysis of causal factors influencing accuracy of guided implant surgery for partial edentulism: a retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Atsushi Matsumura; Tamaki Nakano; Shinji Ono; Akihiro Kaminaka; Hirofumi Yatani; Daijiro Kabata
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-04-19

3.  Computer-assisted preoperative planning of reduction of and osteosynthesis of scapular fracture: A case report.

Authors:  Roman Madeja; Grzegorz Bajor; Ondrej Klima; Lubor Bialy; Jana Pometlova
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2021-10-25

Review 4.  Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Flapless Implant Placement by Means of Mucosa-Supported Templates in Complete-Arch Restorations: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Paolo Carosi; Claudia Lorenzi; Fabrizio Lio; Pierluigi Cardelli; Alessandro Pinto; Andrea Laureti; Alessandro Pozzi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.