Literature DB >> 27884917

Managing barriers to empathy in the clinical encounter: a qualitative interview study with GPs.

Frans Awm Derksen1, Tim C Olde Hartman2, Jozien M Bensing3, Antoine Lm Lagro-Janssen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current daily general practice has become increasingly technical and somatically oriented (where attention to patients' feelings is decreased) due to an increase in protocol-based guidelines. Priorities in GP-patient communication have shifted from a focus on listening and empathy to task-oriented communication. AIM: To explore what barriers GPs experience when applying empathy in daily practice, and how these barriers are managed. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Thirty Dutch GPs with sufficient heterogeneity in sex, age, type of practice, and rural or urban setting were interviewed.
METHOD: The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) were applied. The verbatim transcripts were then analysed.
RESULTS: According to participating GPs, the current emphasis on protocol-driven care can be a significant barrier to genuineness in communication. Other potential barriers mentioned were time pressures and constraints, and dealing with patients displaying 'unruly behaviour' or those with personality disorders. GPs indicated that it can be difficult to balance emotional involvement and professional distance. Longer consulting times, smaller practice populations, and efficient practice organisation were described as practical solutions. In order to focus on a patient-as-person approach, GPs strongly suggested that deviating from guidelines should be possible when necessary as an element of good-quality care. Joining intercollegiate counselling groups was also discussed.
CONCLUSION: In addition to practical solutions for barriers to behaving empathically, GPs indicated that they needed more freedom to balance working with protocols and guidelines, as well as a patient-as-person and patient-as-partner approach. This balance is necessary to remain connected with patients and to deliver care that is truly personal. © British Journal of General Practice 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  empathic behaviour; empathy; patient-centred care; primary health care; protocol-driven care; shared responsibility

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27884917      PMCID: PMC5198671          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X687565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  31 in total

1.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Jonathan Craig
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 2.  Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions.

Authors:  Angela Coulter; Vikki A Entwistle; Abi Eccles; Sara Ryan; Sasha Shepperd; Rafael Perera
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-03-03

3.  The impact of financial incentives on physician empathy: a study from the perspective of patients with private and statutory health insurance.

Authors:  Melanie Neumann; Jozien Bensing; Markus Wirtz; Ansgar Wübker; Christian Scheffer; Diethard Tauschel; Friedrich Edelhäuser; Nicole Ernstmann; Holger Pfaff
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-08-14

4.  Physician empathy: definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Hojat; Joseph S Gonnella; Thomas J Nasca; Salvatore Mangione; Michael Vergare; Michael Magee
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 5.  Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Frans Derksen; Jozien Bensing; Antoine Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  The International Charter for Human Values in Healthcare: an interprofessional global collaboration to enhance values and communication in healthcare.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rider; Suzanne Kurtz; Diana Slade; H Esterbrook Longmaid; Ming-Jung Ho; Jack Kwok-hung Pun; Suzanne Eggins; William T Branch
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-07-05

7.  A comprehensive model for optimizing empathy in person-centered care.

Authors:  Hannah Bayne; Ed Neukrug; Danica Hays; Bruce Britton
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-06-14

Review 8.  Expanding clinical empathy: an activist perspective.

Authors:  Rebecca Garden
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  A good clinician and a caring person: longitudinal faculty development and the enhancement of the human dimensions of care.

Authors:  William T Branch; Richard Frankel; Catherine F Gracey; Paul M Haidet; Peter F Weissmann; Paul Cantey; Gary A Mitchell; Thomas S Inui
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Changes in the quality of doctor-patient communication between 1982 and 2001: an observational study on hypertension care as perceived by patients and general practitioners.

Authors:  Ligaya Butalid; Peter F M Verhaak; Fred Tromp; Jozien M Bensing
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Assessing health-related quality of life among patients with peripheral artery disease: A review of the literature and focus on patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Aishwarya Raja; John Spertus; Robert W Yeh; Eric A Secemsky
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.239

2.  Breaking bad news to antenatal patients with strategies to lessen the pain: a qualitative study.

Authors:  José Atienza-Carrasco; Manuel Linares-Abad; María Padilla-Ruiz; Isabel María Morales-Gil
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.223

3.  Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measures to Promote Integrated Care.

Authors:  Marcel G M Olde Rikkert; Philip J van der Wees; Yvonne Schoon; Gert P Westert
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 5.120

4.  []"Sacred encounters" in primary care: What do they mean for family physicians?]

Authors:  Mikel Baza Bueno; Elena Serrano Ferrández; Ana Dosio Revenga; Nabil Diouri; M José Fernández de Sanmamed Santos; Carlos Calderón Gómez
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 1.137

5.  Personal and professional influences on health visitors' family focused practice for maternal mental illness: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Rachel Leonard; Mark Linden; Anne Grant
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  The perspectives of health professionals and patients on racism in healthcare: A qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Wilson Sim; Wen Hui Lim; Cheng Han Ng; Yip Han Chin; Clyve Yu Leon Yaow; Clare Wei Zhen Cheong; Chin Meng Khoo; Dujeepa D Samarasekera; M Kamala Devi; Choon Seng Chong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Predictors of Physician Compassion, Empathy, and Related Constructs: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alina Pavlova; Clair X Y Wang; Anna L Boggiss; Anne O'Callaghan; Nathan S Consedine
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Negotiating bodily sensations between patients and GPs in the context of standardized cancer patient pathways - an observational study in primary care.

Authors:  Cecilia Hultstrand; Anna-Britt Coe; Mikael Lilja; Senada Hajdarevic
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.