Literature DB >> 27884912

Peer review: acknowledging its value and recognising the reviewers.

Benjamin Joshua Riley1, Roger Jones2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27884912      PMCID： PMC5198655          DOI： 10.3399/bjgp16X688285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN： 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Is open peer review the fairest system? No.

Authors:  Karim Khan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-11-16

2.  Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes.

Authors:  Trish Groves
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-11-16

3.  Is Double-Blinded Peer Review Necessary? The Effect of Blinding on Review Quality.

Authors:  Kevin C Chung; Melissa J Shauver; Sunitha Malay; Lin Zhong; Aaron Weinstein; Rod J Rohrich
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial.

Authors:  S van Rooyen; F Godlee; S Evans; N Black; R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-02

5.  Supporting and enhancing peer review in the BJGP.

Authors:  Abigail Moore; Roger Jones
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the web: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Susan van Rooyen; Tony Delamothe; Stephen J W Evans
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-11-16
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Ethics of medical research and publication.

Authors:  Ish Kumar Dhammi; Rehan Ul Haq
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

2.  Peer review guidance: a primer for researchers.

Authors:  Olena Zimba; Armen Yuri Gasparyan
Journal:  Reumatologia       Date:  2021-02-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.