Literature DB >> 27884614

Robotic major hepatectomy: Is there a learning curve?

Po-Da Chen1, Chao-Yin Wu1, Rey-Heng Hu1, Chiung-Nien Chen1, Ray-Hwang Yuan1, Jin-Tung Liang1, Hong-Shiee Lai1, Yao-Ming Wu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic hepatectomy has been suggested as a safe and effective management of liver disease. However, no large case series have documented the learning curve for robotic major hepatectomy.
METHOD: We conducted a retrospective study for robotic major hepatectomy performed by the same operative team between January 2012 and October 2015 and evaluated the learning curve for operation time using the cumulative sum method, presented as cumulative sumoperation time.
RESULTS: Overall, there were 183 robotic hepatectomies, 92 of which were performed in patients who underwent robotic major hepatectomy: left hemihepatectomy was performed in 32 (34.8%) patients, right hemihepatectomy in 41 (44.6%), left trisectionectomy in 3 (3.3%), right trisectionectomy in 6 (6.5%), and 8-5-4 trisegmentectomy in 10 (10.8%). The median duration of surgery was 434 minutes (142-805 minutes) and the median blood loss was 195 mL (50-2,000 mL). Fifty-nine percent of patients had malignancies, and those with advanced stages of cancer had more blood loss during an operation. The cumulative sumoperation time model of robotic major hepatectomy suggested that the learning curve comprised 3 characteristic phases: initial (phase 1, 15 patients), intermediate (phase 2, 25 patients), and mature (phase 3, 52 patients). The learning effects were underlined by shorter operation time and hospital stay after phase 1 and less blood loss after phase 2.
CONCLUSION: This is the largest series regarding robotic major hepatectomy. Our findings suggest that a solid training program based on the learning curve should be considered for beginners of robotic hepatectomy. Participants should evaluate the evolution of our minimally invasive hepatectomy before considering our robotic experience.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27884614     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  25 in total

1.  Learning Curve in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Liver Resection.

Authors:  Peng Zhu; Wei Liao; Ze-Yang Ding; Lin Chen; Wan-Guang Zhang; Bi-Xiang Zhang; Xiao-Ping Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Robotic gastrointestinal surgery: learning curve, educational programs and outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Vining; Kinga B Skowron; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-01-23

Review 3.  [Robot-assisted liver resection].

Authors:  H Aselmann; T Möller; J-N Kersebaum; J H Egberts; R Croner; M Brunner; R Grützmann; T Becker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.

Authors:  I Kassite; T Bejan-Angoulvant; H Lardy; A Binet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Towards standardized robotic surgery in gastrointestinal oncology.

Authors:  Lawrence M Knab; Amer H Zureikat; Herbert J Zeh; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 6.  Modern therapeutic approaches for the treatment of malignant liver tumours.

Authors:  Henrik Petrowsky; Ralph Fritsch; Matthias Guckenberger; Michelle L De Oliveira; Philipp Dutkowski; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Fully robotic left hepatectomy for malignant tumor: technique and initial results.

Authors:  Marco Vito Marino; Gaspare Gulotta; Andrzej Lech Komorowski
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-07-06

8.  Robotic-assisted right hepatectomy via anterior approach for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sanjay Goja; Manoj K Singh; Rohan Jagat Chaudhary; Arvinder S Soin
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2017-05-23

Review 9.  Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis A Ziogas; Dimitrios Giannis; Stepan M Esagian; Konstantinos P Economopoulos; Samer Tohme; David A Geller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Time to take another look at perceived disadvantages of robotic hepatectomy.

Authors:  Yasushi Hasegawa; Hiroyuki Nitta; Takeshi Takahara; Akira Sasaki
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.