Literature DB >> 27884352

Timing of Coronary Invasive Strategy in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes and Clinical Outcomes: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

Laurent Bonello1, Marc Laine2, Etienne Puymirat3, Gilles Lemesle4, Franck Thuny2, Franck Paganelli5, Pierre Michelet6, Antoine Roch7, François Kerbaul8, Laurent Boyer9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare an early versus a delayed invasive strategy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes by performing a meta-analysis of all available randomized controlled clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: An invasive approach is recommended to prevent death and myocardial infarction in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. However, the timing of angiography and the subsequent intervention, when required, remains controversial.
METHODS: A previous meta-analysis of 7 randomized clinical trials comparing early and delayed invasive strategies in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with 3 new randomized clinical trials identified in a search of the published research (n = 10 trials, n = 6,397 patients) was updated.
RESULTS: The median time between randomization and angiography ranged from 0.5 to 14.0 h in the early group and from 18.3 to 86.0 h in the delayed group. There was no difference in the primary endpoint of mortality (4% vs. 4.7%; random-effects odds ratio [OR]: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67 to 1.09; p = 0.20; I2 = 0%). The rate of myocardial infarction was also similar (6.7% vs. 7.7%; random-effects OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.45; p = 0.62; I2 = 77.5%). An early strategy was associated with a reduction in recurrent ischemia or refractory angina (3.8% vs. 5.8%; random-effects OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.74; p < 0.01; I2 = 28%) and a shorter in-hospital stay (median 112 h [interquartile range: 61 to 158 h] vs. 168 h [interquartile range: 90.3 to 192 h]; random-effects standardized mean difference -0.40; 95% CI: -0.59 to -0.21; p < 0.01; I2 = 79%). Major bleeding was similar in the 2 groups (3.9% vs. 4.2%; random-effects OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.22; p = 0.64; I2 = 0%).
CONCLUSIONS: An early invasive strategy does not reduce the risk for death or myocardial infarction compared with a delayed strategy. Recurrent ischemia and length of stay were significantly reduced with an early invasive strategy.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NSTE-ACS; angiography; invasive; mortality; percutaneous coronary intervention; timing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27884352     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  15 in total

1.  Prime time for the sweet spot in timing of coronary invasive approach in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Eliano P Navarese; Bernhard Wernly; Michael Lichtenauer; Martino Pepe; Wojciech Wanha; Giuseppe Ferrante; Lara Frediani; Verena Veulemans; Tobias Zeus; Ralf Westenfeld; Christian Jung; Paul A Gurbel
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Early versus delayed invasive strategy for intermediate- and high-risk acute coronary syndromes managed without P2Y12 receptor inhibitor pretreatment: Design and rationale of the EARLY randomized trial.

Authors:  Gilles Lemesle; Marc Laine; Mathieu Pankert; Etienne Puymirat; Thomas Cuisset; Ziad Boueri; Luc Maillard; Sébastien Armero; Guillaume Cayla; Laurent Bali; Pascal Motreff; Jean-Pascal Peyre; Franck Paganelli; François Kerbaul; Antoine Roch; Pierre Michelet; Karine Baumstarck; Laurent Bonello
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  The management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: key points from the ESC 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the general and emergency physician.

Authors:  Ramesh Nadarajah; Chris Gale
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 4.  Differences in the 2020 ESC Versus 2015 ESC and 2014 ACC/AHA Guidelines on the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting Without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation.

Authors:  Mohammad Keykhaei; Haleh Ashraf; Sina Rashedi; Hossein Farrokhpour; Behnam Heidari; Shaghayegh Zokaei; Sayna Bagheri; Roham Foroumadi; Sara Asgarian; Aslan Amirian; Shahrokh Karbalai Saleh; Stefan James
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 5.113

5.  Outcomes of early versus delayed invasive strategy in older adults with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yong Hoon Kim; Ae-Young Her; Seung-Woon Rha; Cheol Ung Choi; Byoung Geol Choi; Ji Bak Kim; Soohyung Park; Dong Oh Kang; Ji Young Park; Sang-Ho Park; Myung Ho Jeong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Acute kidney injury requiring dialysis and in-hospital mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing early vs delayed percutaneous coronary intervention: A nationwide analysis.

Authors:  Brijesh Patel; Philip Carson; Mahek Shah; Lohit Garg; Manyoo Agarwal; Sahil Agrawal; Shilpkumar Arora; Susan Steigerwalt; Anthony Bavry; Raman Dusaj; Nainesh Patel; Bruce Feldman
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  Two-year outcome after early or late Intervention in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Erik A Badings; Wouter S Remkes; Salem H K The; Jan-Henk E Dambrink; Geert Tjeerdsma; Saman Rasoul; Jorik R Timmer; Marloes L J van der Wielen; Dirk J A Lok; Renicus S Hermanides; Jan Van Wijngaarden; Harry Suryapranata; Arnoud W J van 't Hof
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2017-03-02

8.  Comparison of early and delayed invasive strategies in short-medium term among patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ming-Bo Zhang; Chen Guo; Min Li; Yong-Hui Lv; Yu-Dong Fan; Zhi-Lu Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Current Perspectives on Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Cardiovascular Disease: A White Paper by the JAHA Editors.

Authors:  Ajay K Gupta; Hani Jneid; Daniel Addison; Hossein Ardehali; Amelia K Boehme; Sanket Borgaonkar; Romain Boulestreau; Kevin Clerkin; Nicolas Delarche; Holli A DeVon; Isabella M Grumbach; Jose Gutierrez; Daniel A Jones; Vikas Kapil; Carmela Maniero; Amgad Mentias; Pamela S Miller; Sher May Ng; Jai D Parekh; Reynaldo H Sanchez; Konrad Teodor Sawicki; Anneline S J M Te Riele; Carol Ann Remme; Barry London
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Unstable angina: trends and characteristics associated with length of hospitalization in the face of diminishing frequency-an evidence of a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Aaqib H Malik; Nauman Siddiqui; Wilbert S Aronow
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.