| Literature DB >> 27882295 |
Simona Fiori1, Andrea Guzzetta2, Jhimli Mitra3, Kerstin Pannek4, Rosa Pasquariello1, Paola Cipriani1, Michela Tosetti1, Giovanni Cioni2, Stephen E Rose3, Anna Chilosi1.
Abstract
Childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) is a paediatric speech sound disorder in which precision and consistency of speech movements are impaired. Most children with idiopathic CAS have normal structural brain MRI. We hypothesize that children with CAS have altered structural connectivity in speech/language networks compared to controls and that these altered connections are related to functional speech/language measures. Whole brain probabilistic tractography, using constrained spherical deconvolution, was performed for connectome generation in 17 children with CAS and 10 age-matched controls. Fractional anisotropy (FA) was used as a measure of connectivity and the connections with altered FA between CAS and controls were identified. Further, the relationship between altered FA and speech/language scores was determined. Three intra-hemispheric/interhemispheric subnetworks showed reduction of FA in CAS compared to controls, including left inferior (opercular part) and superior (dorsolateral, medial and orbital part) frontal gyrus, left superior and middle temporal gyrus and left post-central gyrus (subnetwork 1); right supplementary motor area, left middle and inferior (orbital part) frontal gyrus, left precuneus and cuneus, right superior occipital gyrus and right cerebellum (subnetwork 2); right angular gyrus, right superior temporal gyrus and right inferior occipital gyrus (subnetwork 3). Reduced FA of some connections correlated with diadochokinesis, oromotor skills, expressive grammar and poor lexical production in CAS. These findings provide evidence of structural connectivity anomalies in children with CAS across specific brain regions involved in speech/language function. We propose altered connectivity as a possible epiphenomenon of complex pathogenic mechanisms in CAS which need further investigation.Entities:
Keywords: Childhood apraxia of speech; Connectivity; Diadochokinesis; Diffusion magnetic resonance; Fractional anisotropy
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27882295 PMCID: PMC5114583 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.11.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Presence/absence of ASHA and Strand features for assigning diagnosis of childhood apraxia of speech. Following the Murray et al. (2015) procedure, the first and second Strand features were incorporated into the second ASHA (2007) criterion. The third Strand feature was incorporated into the third ASHA criterion.
| Subject | Age (years) | Gender | Handedness | Inconsistent errors on consonants and vowels (ASHA 1st criterion) | Lengthened and disrupted co-articulatory transitions between sounds and syllables | Inappropriate prosody | Vowel or consonant distortions including distorted substitutions | Groping | Intrusive schwa | Voicing errors | Slow rate (Strand, 8th criterion) | Slow DDK rate (Strand 9th criterion) | Increased difficulty with longer or phonetically more complex words (Strand 10th criterion) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.1 | M | R | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + |
| 2 | 7.0 | M | R | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + |
| 3 | 6.2 | M | R | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + |
| 4 | 6.2 | F | R | + | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | + |
| 5 | 6.0 | M | L | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + |
| 6 | 6.0 | F | R | + | + | − | + | − | − | + | + | + | + |
| 7 | 9.6 | M | R | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 8 | 5.5 | F | R | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + |
| 9 | 7.0 | M | R | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + |
| 10 | 4.9 | M | R | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | − | + | + |
| 11 | 17 | M | R | + | + | + | − | + | − | + | + | + | + |
| 12 | 6.4 | M | R | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + |
| 13 | 5.2 | F | R | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | + |
| 14 | 6.6 | M | R | + | + | − | + | + | − | + | + | + | + |
| 15 | 5.1 | M | R | + | + | + | + | − | − | − | − | + | + |
| 16 | 6.7 | M | R | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + |
| 17 | 6.6 | M | L | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | + |
F: female; M: male; R: right; L: left.
Task description for individual measures of speech/language clinical assessment in children with CAS.
| Task | Description |
|---|---|
| Parental report on case history | Family history, child's pre-, peri- and post-natal clinically significant events, early vocal behaviour, language milestones acquisition (modified version of the questionnaire reported by |
| Phonetic inventory | Repetition of 21 syllables containing all the Italian consonantal sounds |
| Oromotor skills | Assessment of isolated and sequenced volitional verbal and nonverbal oral movements ( |
| Accuracy | Picture naming test ( |
| Consistency | Picture naming test ( |
| Diadochokinesis | Maximum performance rate: fast repetition for 20 s of the trisyllabic non-word sequence /pataka/ |
| Expressive grammar | Analysis of the level of grammatical organization of spontaneous speech according to a six-level rating system, based on stages of grammar acquisition in Italian-speaking children ( |
| Receptive vocabulary | Phono Lexical Test-TFL ( |
| Expressive vocabulary | Phono Lexical Test-TFL ( |
Fig. 1Subnetworks with reduced fractional anisotropy (FA) in children with CAS compared to controls represented on brain renderings. Spheres correspond to significant nodes in the analysis. Sphere size is proportional to the number of altered connections originating from that node. The top panel represents subnetwork 1, the middle panel represents subnetwork 2, and the bottom panel represents subnetwork 3. All subnetworks from the left to the right are represented on axial, coronal and sagittal planes, respectively. Sagittal plane is viewed from the left.
Fig. 2Subnetworks that were significantly different between CAS and controls overlaid on a single image, shown on axial, coronal and sagittal planes (sagittal plane shows view from the left). Thin black lines represent edges (connections) whose average FA value does not correlate with any clinical measure. Brown edges represents: a) the connection between the opercular part of the left inferior frontal gyrus and the left middle temporal gyrus (subnetwork 1), whose average FA value correlates with low diadochokinesis rate (p = 0.01, R = 0.57), poor expressive grammar (p = 0.02, R = 0.53) and poor lexical production (p = 0.003, R = 0.67); b) the connection between the medial part of superior frontal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus (subnetwork 1), whose average FA value correlates with oromotor skills (p = 0.02, R = 0.56); c) the connection between the right superior occipital gyrus and left precuneus (subnetwork 2) whose average FA value correlates with low diadochokinesis rate (p = 0.01, R = 0.57).