Literature DB >> 27882159

National trends for open and endovascular repair of aneurysms in Korea: 2004-2013.

Jin Hyun Joh1, Yun-Young Park1, Sung-Shin Cho1, Ho-Chul Park1.   

Abstract

The introduction of endovascular aneurysm repair has led to a dramatic decline in open aneurysm repair. The aim of this report was to evaluate Korean national trends for the treatment of aneurysms. A serial, cross-sectional study of time trends of patients who underwent aneurysm repair between 2004 and 2013 was conducted. Data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service were used to evaluate the trends of aneurysm repair in the Korean population and to analyze the trends of open and endovascular aneurysm repair among Medicare beneficiaries. A linear-by-linear association was performed to determine alterations in the rates at which these aneurysm repair techniques were performed. A total of 32,130 patients underwent aneurysm repair between 2004 and 2013. The proportion of patients who underwent open repair decreased from 94.0% in 2004 to 54.9% in 2013; whereas the proportion of patients who underwent endovascular repair increased from 6.0% in 2004 to 45.1% in 2013. During the study period, the number of patients undergoing endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms significantly increased from 82 to 1,396 (relative risk, 16.17; 95% confidence interval: 12.94-20.21). Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs)overtook open repair between 2010 and 2011. The frequency of open aneurysm repair increased 1.2-fold, with an overall downward trend. The prevalence of endovascular repair markedly increased 15.3-fold. These findings indicated that, in Korea, the endovascular repair of AAAs overtook open repair as the most common technique between 2010 and 2011.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aneurysm; endovascular procedures; open surgery; trend

Year:  2016        PMID: 27882159      PMCID: PMC5103787          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  20 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology and potential for prevention of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  A B Wilmink; C R Quick
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm repair in the United States from 2000 to 2010.

Authors:  Anahita Dua; SreyRam Kuy; Cheong J Lee; Gilbert R Upchurch; Sapan S Desai
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 3.  Open versus endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  George Dangas; David O'Connor; Belal Firwana; Somjot Brar; Sharif Ellozy; Angeliki Vouyouka; Margaret Arnold; Constantine E Kosmas; Prakash Krishnan; Jose Wiley; Javed Suleman; Jeffrey Olin; Michael Marin; Peter Faries
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 11.195

4.  Long-term results of iliac aneurysm repair with iliac branched endograft: a 5-year experience on 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  G Parlani; F Verzini; P De Rango; D Brambilla; C Coscarella; C Ferrer; P Cao
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 7.069

5.  Endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair: trends in Germany.

Authors:  F Santosa; T Moysidis; T Nowak; C Heilmaier; C Berg; B Luther; K Kröger
Journal:  Vasa       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.961

6.  Routine screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm during clinical transthoracic echocardiography in a Korean population.

Authors:  Se Hoon Oh; Sung-A Chang; Shin Yi Jang; Sung-Ji Park; Jin-Oh Choi; Sang-Chol Lee; Seung Woo Park; Jae K Oh; Duk-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.724

7.  Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group.

Authors:  F A Lederle; G R Johnson; S E Wilson; E P Chute; F N Littooy; D Bandyk; W C Krupski; G W Barone; C W Acher; D J Ballard
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Long-term comparison of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Frank A Lederle; Julie A Freischlag; Tassos C Kyriakides; Jon S Matsumura; Frank T Padberg; Ted R Kohler; Panagiotis Kougias; Jessie M Jean-Claude; Dolores F Cikrit; Kathleen M Swanson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm: the prognosis in women is worse than in men.

Authors:  P E Norman; J T Powell
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Novel surgeon-modified hypogastric branch stent graft to preserve pelvic perfusion.

Authors:  Gustavo S Oderich; Joseph J Ricotta
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 1.466

View more
  5 in total

1.  A Comparative Study of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Endovascular Aneurysm Repair versus Open Repair.

Authors:  Miju Bae; Sung Woon Chung; Chung Won Lee; Seunghwan Song; Eunji Kim; Chang Won Kim
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-08-05

2.  Suitability of the Aortic Neck Anatomy for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Korean Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Authors:  Deokbi Hwang; Jihye Kim; Hyung-Kee Kim; Seung Huh
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2020-06-30

3.  Nationwide Epidemiologic Study of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Korea: A Cross-Sectional Study Using National Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service Data.

Authors:  Chanjoong Choi; Sanghyun Ahn; Sang-Il Min; Moonsang Ahn; Jongwon Ha; Hyung-Jin Yoon; Rina So; Sung Hyouk Choi; Seung-Kee Min
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2019-12-31

4.  Incidence and Risk Factors for Sac Expansion after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Deokbi Hwang; Hyung-Kee Kim; Seung Huh
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2021-11-10

5.  Diseases of the Aorta and Kidney Disease: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference.

Authors:  Pantelis Sarafidis; Sven Martens; Athanasios Saratzis; Daniella Kadian-Dodov; Patrick T Murray; Catherine M Shanahan; Allen D Hamdan; Daniel T Engelman; Ulf Teichgräber; Charles A Herzog; Michael Cheung; Michel Jadoul; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Holger Reinecke; Kirsten Johansen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 13.081

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.