Literature DB >> 23078738

Open versus endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

George Dangas1, David O'Connor, Belal Firwana, Somjot Brar, Sharif Ellozy, Angeliki Vouyouka, Margaret Arnold, Constantine E Kosmas, Prakash Krishnan, Jose Wiley, Javed Suleman, Jeffrey Olin, Michael Marin, Peter Faries.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the short-, intermediate-, and longer-term outcomes after endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), including both AAA-related and all-cause mortality.
BACKGROUND: Endovascular stent graft placement for AAA has gained broad acceptance as an alternative to open surgical repair due to a lower perioperative morbidity and mortality. The intermediate- and long-term all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality vary among studies. Thus, we sought to perform a meta-analysis of open versus endovascular repair for treating AAA.
METHODS: Electronic databases were queried for identification of prospective, randomized trials of open surgery versus endovascular stent graft repair of AAA. A total of 10 published papers reporting on 6 studies at different follow-up intervals were identified; they involved 2,899 patients with AAA repair procedures, of whom, 1,470 underwent endovascular stent graft AAA exclusion and 1,429 were treated by open AAA repair.
RESULTS: At 30 days, the pooled relative risk of all-cause mortality was lower in the endovascular group (relative risk [RR]: 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19 to 0.64) than in the open surgery group. At intermediate follow-up, the all-cause mortality had a nonsignificant difference (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.57 to 1.08), the AAA-related mortality was significantly lower (RR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.74) and reintervention rates were higher (RR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.08) in the endovascular group than in the open surgery group. At long-term follow-up, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.15) or AAA-related mortality (RR: 1.58, 95% CI: 0.20 to 12.74), whereas the significant difference in the rate of reinterventions persisted (RR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.58 to 4.08).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients randomized to open or endovascular AAA repair, all-cause perioperative mortality, as well as AAA-related mortality at short- and intermediate-term follow-up are lower in patients undergoing endovascular stent graft placement. This was associated with greater reintervention in the endovascular group noted at intermediate follow-up. Long-term survival appears to converge between the 2 groups.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23078738     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  18 in total

1.  Synchronous colorectal malignancy and abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular aneurysm repair followed by laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  Kazushige Kawai; Eiji Sunami; Junichiro Tanaka; Toshiaki Tanaka; Tomomichi Kiyomatsu; Hiroaki Nozawa; Shinsuke Kazama; Takamitsu Kanazawa; Akihiro Hosaka; Soichiro Ishihara; Hironori Yamaguchi; Kunihiro Shigematsu; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-04

2.  Low mortality rates after endovascular aortic repair expand use to high-risk patients.

Authors:  Shaunak S Adkar; Megan C Turner; Harold J Leraas; Brian F Gilmore; Uttara Nag; Ryan S Turley; Cynthia K Shortell; Leila Mureebe
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 3.  Open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Sarah E Deery; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Renal dysfunction after abdominal or thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Shuji Ikeda; Makiyo Hagihara; Akira Kitagawa; Yuichiro Izumi; Kojiro Suzuki; Toyohiro Ota; Tsuneo Ishiguchi; Hiroyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  National trends for open and endovascular repair of aneurysms in Korea: 2004-2013.

Authors:  Jin Hyun Joh; Yun-Young Park; Sung-Shin Cho; Ho-Chul Park
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Grey relational analysis of benefit of surgical management for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Kaifeng Wang; Shiyan Ren; Songyi Qian; Peng Liu
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

Review 7.  Management of Endoleaks.

Authors:  James Chen; S William Stavropoulos
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 8.  Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Evolving Controversies and Uncertainties.

Authors:  Davide Carino; Timur P Sarac; Bulat A Ziganshin; John A Elefteriades
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2018-05-29

Review 9.  Enhanced recovery after elective open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a complementary overview through a pooled analysis of proportions from case series studies.

Authors:  Sanderland J T Gurgel; Regina El Dib; Paulo do Nascimento
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Type II endoleaks: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Andrew Brown; Greta K Saggu; Matthew J Bown; Robert D Sayers; David A Sidloff
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2016-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.