Sandra E Rees1, Rati Chadha2, Lois E Donovan3, Adrienne L T Guitard4, Sudha Koppula5, Andreas Laupacis6, Sara Simpson4, Jeffrey A Johnson7. 1. School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 2. Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 4. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 5. Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 6. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 7. School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: jeff.johnson@ualberta.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We involved patients and clinicians in Alberta, Canada, to establish research priorities in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), using an approach based on a model proposed by the James Lind Alliance (JLA). METHODS: We adapted the 4-step JLA process to engage women with GDM and clinicians to identify uncertainties about the management of GDM. Uncertainties were identified through a survey and a review of the clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Uncertainties were short-listed by a steering committee, followed by a 1-day facilitated workshop using a nominal group format and involving a similar number of patients and clinicians, who identified the top 10 research priorities. RESULTS: Across the various survey formats, 75 individuals submitted 389 uncertainties, the majority (44; 59%) coming from patients. We removed 9 questions as being out of scope or unclear, and 41 were identified on a review of CPG, resulting in a total of 421 uncertainties. After the priority setting process, the final top 10 research priorities included questions about a simpler, more accurate and convenient screening test; risk factors for GDM; improving postpartum diabetes screening; the impact of GDM on the future health of the children; lifestyle challenges and mental health issues; safety, effectiveness and/or impact of diet and/or medication treatments; appropriate timing for delivery; and how care is provided, organized or communicated. CONCLUSIONS: These top 10 research priorities were informed through a comprehensive and transparent process involving women who have experienced GDM as well as clinicians, and they may be regarded as research priorities for GDM.
OBJECTIVES: We involved patients and clinicians in Alberta, Canada, to establish research priorities in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), using an approach based on a model proposed by the James Lind Alliance (JLA). METHODS: We adapted the 4-step JLA process to engage women with GDM and clinicians to identify uncertainties about the management of GDM. Uncertainties were identified through a survey and a review of the clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Uncertainties were short-listed by a steering committee, followed by a 1-day facilitated workshop using a nominal group format and involving a similar number of patients and clinicians, who identified the top 10 research priorities. RESULTS: Across the various survey formats, 75 individuals submitted 389 uncertainties, the majority (44; 59%) coming from patients. We removed 9 questions as being out of scope or unclear, and 41 were identified on a review of CPG, resulting in a total of 421 uncertainties. After the priority setting process, the final top 10 research priorities included questions about a simpler, more accurate and convenient screening test; risk factors for GDM; improving postpartum diabetes screening; the impact of GDM on the future health of the children; lifestyle challenges and mental health issues; safety, effectiveness and/or impact of diet and/or medication treatments; appropriate timing for delivery; and how care is provided, organized or communicated. CONCLUSIONS: These top 10 research priorities were informed through a comprehensive and transparent process involving women who have experienced GDM as well as clinicians, and they may be regarded as research priorities for GDM.
Authors: Meghan S Ingstrup; Lisa A Wozniak; Nonsi Mathe; Sonia Butalia; Margie H Davenport; Jeffrey A Johnson; Steven T Johnson Journal: Health Psychol Behav Med Date: 2019-05-09