Literature DB >> 27881212

Building machines that learn and think like people.

Brenden M Lake1, Tomer D Ullman2, Joshua B Tenenbaum3, Samuel J Gershman4.   

Abstract

Recent progress in artificial intelligence has renewed interest in building systems that learn and think like people. Many advances have come from using deep neural networks trained end-to-end in tasks such as object recognition, video games, and board games, achieving performance that equals or even beats that of humans in some respects. Despite their biological inspiration and performance achievements, these systems differ from human intelligence in crucial ways. We review progress in cognitive science suggesting that truly human-like learning and thinking machines will have to reach beyond current engineering trends in both what they learn and how they learn it. Specifically, we argue that these machines should (1) build causal models of the world that support explanation and understanding, rather than merely solving pattern recognition problems; (2) ground learning in intuitive theories of physics and psychology to support and enrich the knowledge that is learned; and (3) harness compositionality and learning-to-learn to rapidly acquire and generalize knowledge to new tasks and situations. We suggest concrete challenges and promising routes toward these goals that can combine the strengths of recent neural network advances with more structured cognitive models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27881212     DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X16001837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Sci        ISSN: 0140-525X            Impact factor:   12.579


  100 in total

Review 1.  Big-Data Science in Porous Materials: Materials Genomics and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Kevin Maik Jablonka; Daniele Ongari; Seyed Mohamad Moosavi; Berend Smit
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Neural representation of abstract task structure during generalization.

Authors:  Avinash R Vaidya; Henry M Jones; Johanny Castillo; David Badre
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 3.  Learning task-state representations.

Authors:  Yael Niv
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicists.

Authors:  Pankaj Mehta; Ching-Hao Wang; Alexandre G R Day; Clint Richardson; Marin Bukov; Charles K Fisher; David J Schwab
Journal:  Phys Rep       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 25.600

5.  News Feature: What are the limits of deep learning?

Authors:  M Mitchell Waldrop
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Direct Fit to Nature: An Evolutionary Perspective on Biological and Artificial Neural Networks.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Samuel A Nastase; Ariel Goldstein
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 7.  If deep learning is the answer, what is the question?

Authors:  Andrew Saxe; Stephanie Nelli; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 8.  Formalizing emotion concepts within a Bayesian model of theory of mind.

Authors:  Rebecca Saxe; Sean Dae Houlihan
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2017-04-27

9.  Computational evidence for hierarchically structured reinforcement learning in humans.

Authors:  Maria K Eckstein; Anne G E Collins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Convergent Temperature Representations in Artificial and Biological Neural Networks.

Authors:  Martin Haesemeyer; Alexander F Schier; Florian Engert
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.