Beyene Negatu1,2, Hans Kromhout1, Yalemtshay Mekonnen3, Roel Vermeulen1. 1. Division of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 2. Pesticide Risk Reduction Project-Ethiopia, Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 3. Collage of Natural & Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Abstract
RATIONALE: In the last decade, due to expansion of greenhouses and irrigated farms, the use of pesticides in Ethiopia has increased 6-13-fold leading to potential health risks. OBJECTIVE: To investigate if occupational exposure to pesticides is associated with respiratory health effects in farmers and farm workers from commercial farming systems. METHODS: We performed two cross-sectional surveys comprising different farming systems. In the first survey we studied respiratory symptoms among 1104 subjects of which 601 were occupationally exposed to pesticides (ie, 256 pesticide applicators, 345 re-entry workers) and 503 unexposed individuals. The second survey, carried out 2 years later in the same farming regions, additionally included lung function measurement and comprised a total of 387 study subjects of which 206 were occupationally exposed to pesticides (142 applicators and 64 re-entry workers) and 180 unexposed individuals. RESULTS: We observed increased risks for chronic cough and shortness of breath (OR=3.15, 95% CI 1.56 to 6.36 and OR=6.67, 95% CI 2.60 to 17.58) among the exposed subjects as compared with unexposed individuals in the first survey. These results were corroborated in the second survey where we also observed reductions in FEV1 (140 mL), forced expiratory flow 25%-75% (550 mL/s) and risk of FEV1/FVC ratio <0.8 (OR=4.31, 95% CI 2.11 to 8.81) among pesticide exposed workers. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate an increased risk of adverse respiratory health among workers exposed to pesticides. As those effects occurred in young workers (mean age 27 years) and within a relative short duration of exposure (4 years) implementation of stringent occupational health measures are warranted. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
RATIONALE: In the last decade, due to expansion of greenhouses and irrigated farms, the use of pesticides in Ethiopia has increased 6-13-fold leading to potential health risks. OBJECTIVE: To investigate if occupational exposure to pesticides is associated with respiratory health effects in farmers and farm workers from commercial farming systems. METHODS: We performed two cross-sectional surveys comprising different farming systems. In the first survey we studied respiratory symptoms among 1104 subjects of which 601 were occupationally exposed to pesticides (ie, 256 pesticide applicators, 345 re-entry workers) and 503 unexposed individuals. The second survey, carried out 2 years later in the same farming regions, additionally included lung function measurement and comprised a total of 387 study subjects of which 206 were occupationally exposed to pesticides (142 applicators and 64 re-entry workers) and 180 unexposed individuals. RESULTS: We observed increased risks for chronic cough and shortness of breath (OR=3.15, 95% CI 1.56 to 6.36 and OR=6.67, 95% CI 2.60 to 17.58) among the exposed subjects as compared with unexposed individuals in the first survey. These results were corroborated in the second survey where we also observed reductions in FEV1 (140 mL), forced expiratory flow 25%-75% (550 mL/s) and risk of FEV1/FVC ratio <0.8 (OR=4.31, 95% CI 2.11 to 8.81) among pesticide exposed workers. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate an increased risk of adverse respiratory health among workers exposed to pesticides. As those effects occurred in young workers (mean age 27 years) and within a relative short duration of exposure (4 years) implementation of stringent occupational health measures are warranted. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: Siti Khairunnisaq Rudzi; Yu Bin Ho; Eugenie Sin Sing Tan; Juliana Jalaludin; Patimah Ismail Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Meaza Gezu Shentema; Magne Bråtveit; Abera Kumie; Wakgari Deressa; Bente Elisabeth Moen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne; Shohreh F Farzan; Mitiasoa Razafy; Jill E Johnston Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2022-04-04 Impact factor: 10.753
Authors: Jessica Y Islam; Jane Hoppin; Ana M Mora; Manuel E Soto-Martinez; Leonel Córdoba Gamboa; Jorge Ernesto Peñaloza Castañeda; Brian Reich; Christian Lindh; Berna van Wendel de Joode Journal: Thorax Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 9.102
Authors: Brooke Alhanti; Berna van Wendel de Joode; Manuel Soto Martinez; Ana M Mora; Leonel Córdoba Gamboa; Brian Reich; Christian H Lindh; Marcela Quirós Lépiz; Jane A Hoppin Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 4.948
Authors: Christian Schyllert; Martin Andersson; Linnea Hedman; Magnus Ekström; Helena Backman; Anne Lindberg; Eva Rönmark Journal: Eur Clin Respir J Date: 2018-05-15
Authors: Rafael J Buralli; Helena Ribeiro; Thais Mauad; Luís F Amato-Lourenço; João M Salge; Fredi A Diaz-Quijano; Renata S Leão; Rejane C Marques; Daniele S Silva; Jean Remy Davée Guimarães Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-06-08 Impact factor: 3.390