SCOPE: The pomegranate lipid-lowering properties remain controversial, probably due to the interindividual variability in polyphenol (ellagitannins) metabolism. OBJECTIVE: We aimed at investigating whether the microbially derived ellagitannin-metabolizing phenotypes, i.e. urolithin metabotypes A, (UM-A), B (UM-B), and 0 (UM-0), influence the effects of pomegranate extract (PE) consumption on 18 cardiovascular risk biomarkers in healthy overweight-obese individuals. METHODS AND RESULTS: A double-blind, crossover, dose-response, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted. The study (POMEcardio) consisted of two test phases (dose-1 and dose-2, lasting 3 weeks each) and a 3-week washout period between each phase. Forty-nine participants (BMI > 27 kg/m2 ) daily consumed one (dose-1, 160 mg phenolics/day) or four (dose-2, 640 mg phenolics/day) PE or placebo capsules. Notably, UM-B individuals showed the highest baseline cardiovascular risk. After dose-2, total cholesterol (-15.5 ± 3.7%), LDL-cholesterol (-14.9 ± 2.1%), small LDL-cholesterol (-47 ± 7%), non-HDL-cholesterol (-11.3 ± 2.5%), apolipoprotein-B (-12 ± 2.2%), and oxidized LDL-cholesterol -24 ± 2.5%) dose dependently decreased (P < 0.05) but only in UM-B subjects. These effects were partially correlated with urolithin production and the increase in Gordonibacter levels. Three (50%) nonproducers (UM-0) became producers following PE consumption. CONCLUSIONS: UM clustering suggests a personalized effect of ellagitannin-containing foods and could explain the controversial pomegranate benefits. Research on the specific role of urolithins and the microbiota associated with each UM is warranted.
RCT Entities:
SCOPE: The pomegranatelipid-lowering properties remain controversial, probably due to the interindividual variability in polyphenol (ellagitannins) metabolism. OBJECTIVE: We aimed at investigating whether the microbially derived ellagitannin-metabolizing phenotypes, i.e. urolithin metabotypes A, (UM-A), B (UM-B), and 0 (UM-0), influence the effects of pomegranate extract (PE) consumption on 18 cardiovascular risk biomarkers in healthy overweight-obese individuals. METHODS AND RESULTS: A double-blind, crossover, dose-response, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted. The study (POMEcardio) consisted of two test phases (dose-1 and dose-2, lasting 3 weeks each) and a 3-week washout period between each phase. Forty-nine participants (BMI > 27 kg/m2 ) daily consumed one (dose-1, 160 mg phenolics/day) or four (dose-2, 640 mg phenolics/day) PE or placebo capsules. Notably, UM-B individuals showed the highest baseline cardiovascular risk. After dose-2, total cholesterol (-15.5 ± 3.7%), LDL-cholesterol (-14.9 ± 2.1%), small LDL-cholesterol (-47 ± 7%), non-HDL-cholesterol (-11.3 ± 2.5%), apolipoprotein-B (-12 ± 2.2%), and oxidized LDL-cholesterol -24 ± 2.5%) dose dependently decreased (P < 0.05) but only in UM-B subjects. These effects were partially correlated with urolithin production and the increase in Gordonibacter levels. Three (50%) nonproducers (UM-0) became producers following PE consumption. CONCLUSIONS: UM clustering suggests a personalized effect of ellagitannin-containing foods and could explain the controversial pomegranate benefits. Research on the specific role of urolithins and the microbiota associated with each UM is warranted.
Authors: Pedro Mena; Iziar A Ludwig; Virginia B Tomatis; Animesh Acharjee; Luca Calani; Alice Rosi; Furio Brighenti; Sumantra Ray; Julian L Griffin; Les J Bluck; Daniele Del Rio Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: María V Selma; David Beltrán; María C Luna; María Romo-Vaquero; Rocío García-Villalba; Alex Mira; Juan C Espín; Francisco A Tomás-Barberán Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: María-Teresa García-Conesa; Karen Chambers; Emilie Combet; Paula Pinto; Mar Garcia-Aloy; Cristina Andrés-Lacueva; Sonia de Pascual-Teresa; Pedro Mena; Alekxandra Konic Ristic; Wendy J Hollands; Paul A Kroon; Ana Rodríguez-Mateos; Geoffrey Istas; Christos A Kontogiorgis; Dilip K Rai; Eileen R Gibney; Christine Morand; Juan Carlos Espín; Antonio González-Sarrías Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Jieping Yang; Yuanqiang Guo; Susanne M Henning; Brenda Chan; Jianfeng Long; Jin Zhong; Rebeca Acin-Perez; Anton Petcherski; Orian Shirihai; David Heber; Zhaoping Li Journal: Mol Nutr Food Res Date: 2020-08-23 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Kristen M Roberts; Elizabeth M Grainger; Jennifer M Thomas-Ahner; Alice Hinton; Junnan Gu; Ken Riedl; Yael Vodovotz; Ronney Abaza; Steven J Schwartz; Steven K Clinton Journal: Mol Nutr Food Res Date: 2020-03-17 Impact factor: 6.575