Literature DB >> 27878052

Missing the mark: Current practices in teaching the male urogenital examination to Canadian undergraduate medical students.

Kristen McAlpine1, Stephen Steele1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The urogenital physical examination is an important aspect of patient encounters in various clinical settings. Introductory clinical skills sessions are intended to provide support and alleviate students' anxiety when learning this sensitive exam. The techniques each Canadian medical school uses to guide their students through the initial urogenital examination has not been previously reported.
METHODS: This study surveyed pre-clerkship clinical skills program directors at the main campus of English-speaking Canadian medical schools regarding the curriculum they use to teach the urogenital examination.
RESULTS: A response rate of 100% was achieved, providing information on resources and faculty available to students, as well as the manner in which students were evaluated. Surprisingly, over one-third of the Canadian medical schools surveyed failed to provide a setting in which students perform a urogenital examination on a patient in their pre-clinical years. Additionally, there was no formal evaluation of this skill set reported by almost 50% of Canadian medical schools prior to clinical training years.
CONCLUSIONS: To ensure medical students are confident and accurate in performing a urogenital examination, it is vital they be provided the proper resources, teaching, and training. As we progress towards a competency-based curriculum, it is essential that increased focus be placed on patient encounters in undergraduate training. Further research to quantify students' exposure to the urogenital examination during clinical years would be of interest. Without this commitment by Canadian medical schools, we are doing a disservice not only to the medical students, but also to our patient population.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27878052      PMCID: PMC5110419          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.3679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  7 in total

1.  Use of mannequin-based simulation to decrease student anxiety prior to interacting with male teaching associates.

Authors:  Carla M Pugh; Katherine Blossfield Iannitelli; Deborah Rooney; Lawrence Salud
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.414

2.  Can online learning adequately prepare medical students to undertake a first female pelvic examination?

Authors:  Ruth Ronn; Whitney Smith; Bryden Magee; Philip M Hahn; Robert L Reid
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2012-03

3.  Medical students' self-reported experiences performing pelvic, breast, and male genital examinations and the influence of student gender and physician supervision.

Authors:  Heidi S Powell; Janis Bridge; Staci Eskesen; Franchesca Estrada; Mary Laya
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Teaching digital rectal examination to medical students using a structured workshop-a point in the right direction?

Authors:  John Isherwood; Zakariye Ashkir; Sofoklis Panteleimonitis; Nisha Kumar; David Hemingway; Andrew S Miller; Mike N Norwood; Justin M Yeung
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.891

5.  Medical Students' First Male Urogenital Examination: Investigating the Effects of Instruction and Gender on Anxiety.

Authors:  Lisa D Howley; Karen Dickerson
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2003-12

6.  Men's health: it is imperative to teach scrotal and rectal examination.

Authors:  Christine Fairbank
Journal:  Clin Teach       Date:  2011-06

7.  Leveraging virtual humans to effectively prepare learners for stressful interpersonal experiences.

Authors:  Andrew Robb; Regis Kopper; Ravi Ambani; Farda Qayyum; David Lind; Li-Ming Su; Benjamin Lok
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.579

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.